Are these #'s weak??
#1
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,158
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Are these #'s weak??
Ran my car on a Portable Dyno (unsure of the name) during a tune party (non sponsor).
Car put down 466 RWHP/ 460 RWTQ NA
Car specs: 383 stroker, LS6 heads- 2.02/1.60 59cc ,Fast 90mm intake, NW 90mm TB, 236/242 624/609 113+3 JPH Cam, FTRA and 85mm Lid, 85mm MAF, T56, Strange 3" CMDS, MWC Fab 9" 3.89 gears, 17X11 ZR1's
Car put down 466 RWHP/ 460 RWTQ NA
Car specs: 383 stroker, LS6 heads- 2.02/1.60 59cc ,Fast 90mm intake, NW 90mm TB, 236/242 624/609 113+3 JPH Cam, FTRA and 85mm Lid, 85mm MAF, T56, Strange 3" CMDS, MWC Fab 9" 3.89 gears, 17X11 ZR1's
#2
Auto or 6 spd?
nevermind. I see in your sig. Im sure many will pipe in and say they look low, but in my experience, I have seen smaller cubes make more power and some the size of yours make similar numbers if not a little less.
if numbers concern you, find another dyno and make a couple of pulls to see what that dyno reads.
nevermind. I see in your sig. Im sure many will pipe in and say they look low, but in my experience, I have seen smaller cubes make more power and some the size of yours make similar numbers if not a little less.
if numbers concern you, find another dyno and make a couple of pulls to see what that dyno reads.
#4
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,158
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Not really concerned, this is a different cam grind from prior. I know my heads are probably a bit too small...doesn't help and the cam is more for my Nitrous setup. Old numbers were 484/440 with a GT1-1 LPE cam and ported FAST intake also a Moser 12 bolt. Just curious what the masses would say.
Last edited by SS1875; 05-25-2009 at 02:17 AM.
Trending Topics
#14
#15
505/525 on stock cubes from a 346 with a 224 cam? I'd like to see that. What power adder is on that?
#18
I was implying the restriction. Most cars with a fast 90/90 with a 85mm maf are restricted by the maf. I know very well that there is no hp if the maf being a restriction. But in this case it is!!! Quite a large one!!! So my statement wasn't exactly "incorrect"