Dynoed AFR Heads VRX2 Ported Fast 92mm
10-07-2009, 11:38 AM
#1
Dynoed AFR Heads VRX2 Ported Fast 92mm Wanted to try a mix match setup.. Mods in Sig, plus using Pacesetter 1 3/4 headers, steel flywheel and high flow carsound cats that are 3 yrs old. 85 degrees and 95% humidity. I know yes with kooks or QTP headers and/or an open cutout and a LW flywheel and 85mm MAF it will be more. Although I am using a ported smooth out stock maf.
Of course I wanna thank vengence racing and AFR for there products but wanna give a special thanks to RevXtreme in Fla for Helping me with my build. Thanks again Tracy and Matt.
Would also like to add that this car runs like a raped ape past 3500 rpms.
Of course I wanna thank vengence racing and AFR for there products but wanna give a special thanks to RevXtreme in Fla for Helping me with my build. Thanks again Tracy and Matt.
Would also like to add that this car runs like a raped ape past 3500 rpms.
Last edited by corvet786c; 10-07-2009 at 04:02 PM.
10-07-2009, 12:16 PM
#2
Wanted to try a mix match setup. I am sure I could have gotten a lil more but I am fine with it. Mods in Sig plus using Pacesetter 1 3/4 headers steel flywheel and 85 degrees and 95% humidity.
Of course I wanna thank vengence racing and AFR for there products but wanna give a special thanks to RevXtreme in Fla for Helping me with my build. Thanks again Tracy and Matt.
Would also like to add that this car runs like a raped ape past 3500 rpms.
Of course I wanna thank vengence racing and AFR for there products but wanna give a special thanks to RevXtreme in Fla for Helping me with my build. Thanks again Tracy and Matt.
Would also like to add that this car runs like a raped ape past 3500 rpms.
Trending Topics
10-13-2009, 12:59 PM
#17
Are you running an UD pulley? I don't think the numbers are horrible as I have seen similar setups pull different numbers on different dyno's. If I remember correctly, you previously had a different cam/rocker setup and then made this change. What were the changes and can you show one dyno vs. the new setup?
10-13-2009, 01:59 PM
#18
Are you running an UD pulley? I don't think the numbers are horrible as I have seen similar setups pull different numbers on different dyno's. If I remember correctly, you previously had a different cam/rocker setup and then made this change. What were the changes and can you show one dyno vs. the new setup?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...re-though.html
Last edited by corvet786c; 10-13-2009 at 02:12 PM.
10-13-2009, 04:03 PM
#19
So the changes were new cam of slightly more duration, drop from Crane 1.8 to YT 1.7 rockers and a FAST for the new setup?
I would talk to Tony Mamo but I think you need to look at the exhaust side of the setup. See what Tony thinks. I think the cam it performing good because of the nice flat curve you have and it certainly carries well to the higher RPM.
I would talk to Tony Mamo but I think you need to look at the exhaust side of the setup. See what Tony thinks. I think the cam it performing good because of the nice flat curve you have and it certainly carries well to the higher RPM.
10-13-2009, 04:10 PM
#20
So the changes were new cam of slightly more duration, drop from Crane 1.8 to YT 1.7 rockers and a FAST for the new setup?
I would talk to Tony Mamo but I think you need to look at the exhaust side of the setup. See what Tony thinks. I think the cam it performing good because of the nice flat curve you have and it certainly carries well to the higher RPM.
I would talk to Tony Mamo but I think you need to look at the exhaust side of the setup. See what Tony thinks. I think the cam it performing good because of the nice flat curve you have and it certainly carries well to the higher RPM.