Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

2010 Camaro SS LS3 bolt on dyno #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2010, 04:54 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default 2010 Camaro SS LS3 bolt on dyno #'s

I posted up the results a couple days ago in the 2010 camaro section. Figured I would post it here and get some more feedback.

Car did very good. Best pull was 435rwhp and 418rwtq.
Old 04-28-2010, 04:59 PM
  #2  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

435 on a Mustang dyno?
Old 04-28-2010, 05:06 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Damian
435 on a Mustang dyno?
Yeah. A few other bolt on ls3's hit 42x rwhp with my mods on a mustang dyno. I had slightly more at peak because i went with 2 inch headers and also had an underdrive crank pulley. This will give you about 10 more rwhp over typical bolt on #'s. 1 3/4 primary cars with no ud pulley are around 405-415rwhp on mustang dyno.

The way the tuner explained it to me was that on the street the car actually makes 428/408 when at full temp. This was give or take a couple horsepower from all the pulls made when at full temp/slightly hot.

We then did a "Money pull" as he called it after the car cooled down for about 45 minutes. It then made 435/418...then immediately after made 433/412, then immediately after that made 430/410....when totally heat soaked and ran consecutively the car never dipped below 426rwhp.
Old 04-29-2010, 06:22 AM
  #4  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Those are strong numbers for certain. I wonder how the drivetrain efficiency compares in a 2010 to a 98-02 f-body.
Old 04-30-2010, 04:21 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Silver408z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
Yeah. A few other bolt on ls3's hit 42x rwhp with my mods on a mustang dyno. I had slightly more at peak because i went with 2 inch headers and also had an underdrive crank pulley. This will give you about 10 more rwhp over typical bolt on #'s. 1 3/4 primary cars with no ud pulley are around 405-415rwhp on mustang dyno.

The way the tuner explained it to me was that on the street the car actually makes 428/408 when at full temp. This was give or take a couple horsepower from all the pulls made when at full temp/slightly hot.

We then did a "Money pull" as he called it after the car cooled down for about 45 minutes. It then made 435/418...then immediately after made 433/412, then immediately after that made 430/410....when totally heat soaked and ran consecutively the car never dipped below 426rwhp.
I think he meant it that way because the numbers might be low for a dyno jet. Good for a mustang dyno, bad for dyno jet



Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro SS LS3 bolt on dyno #'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.