new numbers 240sx H/C
06-06-2010, 04:47 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
new numbers 240sx H/C IM a little disappionted, but wasnt expecting much more in the numbers but it was pretty hot at the time, about 10 or so more then when i got it dyno`d last time.
i was hoping for 420 and 380 tq but heres the pics. i need to get a better intake or something cause it suck up nothing but hot air.
headers, ls6 stage 2 heads, tv2 112+0. no cats. 36lb injectors and ls7 lifters.
this car is all top end now lol
this is a ls2 got with headers an not cats. he only dyno`d 15 more then me when i only had those mods...Ls2<Ls1lol
i was hoping for 420 and 380 tq but heres the pics. i need to get a better intake or something cause it suck up nothing but hot air.
headers, ls6 stage 2 heads, tv2 112+0. no cats. 36lb injectors and ls7 lifters.
this car is all top end now lol
this is a ls2 got with headers an not cats. he only dyno`d 15 more then me when i only had those mods...Ls2<Ls1lol
06-06-2010, 10:43 PM
#3
What the trans/rear end setup? You can make 420/380 on stock heads in an F-bod (I did with a 233/239 cam and 90mm intake/TB with bolt-ons). I bet it is fun to drive though - what does it weigh? Another thing to consider is the dyno is just a tool and the track tells you how much power you're really making.
06-07-2010, 12:26 AM
#4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tras is a t56 stock, j30 infinity 3.93 gears.
stock TB and stock ls6 intake.
weights 2880 with full interior and huge speakers and box lol wnat to put it on a small diet and get her down to around 2700. shouldnt be too hard at all
here is a chart of the before and after the heads and cam.
you can see it flys stright up and past the last
the gain is on the average IMO and research.
most people with a better intake and port stock TB and pulley is around 425-435. so IMO with a fast IM and TB set up with some advancing, i`ll be up there.
stock TB and stock ls6 intake.
weights 2880 with full interior and huge speakers and box lol wnat to put it on a small diet and get her down to around 2700. shouldnt be too hard at all
here is a chart of the before and after the heads and cam.
you can see it flys stright up and past the last
the gain is on the average IMO and research.
most people with a better intake and port stock TB and pulley is around 425-435. so IMO with a fast IM and TB set up with some advancing, i`ll be up there.
06-07-2010, 10:42 AM
#6
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thoguht i posted it up on first post..
first dyno mods: headers crappy exhaust and and same intake.(dark line,blue)325/336
second dyno mods: fixed exhaust(nocats) everything else the same besides; heads,cam,ls7lfiters.(red lines) 409/368
first dyno mods: headers crappy exhaust and and same intake.(dark line,blue)325/336
second dyno mods: fixed exhaust(nocats) everything else the same besides; heads,cam,ls7lfiters.(red lines) 409/368
Trending Topics
06-07-2010, 05:10 PM
#9
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Owatonna,MN
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bet that car just plain hauls! Ya I would think the numbers would be higher, but like someone stated b4 dyno is just a starting point, the track will tell u what u really are puttin down! Have fun and tear it up bro!
Vince
Vince
07-08-2010, 01:26 AM
#13
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i went to the track a week ago and am very unpleased.
my old times were 12.6@ 115.5(best) with 330/336.
new times are 12.7@ 118.89 with 409/368.
im stumped on this, i think there has to be something wrong. i even tried to ease on it so i could hook up but still wasnt getting the times i should be getting.
how can 3k only give me 3mph faster. Yes,i know i need slicks or at least DR but still.
the guys ive seen online with just a cam are running high 11`s(11.8`s) at like 120.
yes there on DR but is that really holding me back that much?
my old times were 12.6@ 115.5(best) with 330/336.
new times are 12.7@ 118.89 with 409/368.
im stumped on this, i think there has to be something wrong. i even tried to ease on it so i could hook up but still wasnt getting the times i should be getting.
how can 3k only give me 3mph faster. Yes,i know i need slicks or at least DR but still.
the guys ive seen online with just a cam are running high 11`s(11.8`s) at like 120.
yes there on DR but is that really holding me back that much?
07-08-2010, 01:41 AM
#14
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i went to the track a week ago and am very unpleased.
my old times were 12.6@ 115.5(best) with 330/336.
new times are 12.7@ 118.89 with 409/368.
im stumped on this, i think there has to be something wrong. i even tried to ease on it so i could hook up but still wasnt getting the times i should be getting.
how can 3k only give me 3mph faster. Yes,i know i need slicks or at least DR but still.
the guys ive seen online with just a cam are running high 11`s(11.8`s) at like 120.
yes there on DR but is that really holding me back that much?
my old times were 12.6@ 115.5(best) with 330/336.
new times are 12.7@ 118.89 with 409/368.
im stumped on this, i think there has to be something wrong. i even tried to ease on it so i could hook up but still wasnt getting the times i should be getting.
how can 3k only give me 3mph faster. Yes,i know i need slicks or at least DR but still.
the guys ive seen online with just a cam are running high 11`s(11.8`s) at like 120.
yes there on DR but is that really holding me back that much?
whats your car weigh?
07-08-2010, 09:07 AM
#15
i went to the track a week ago and am very unpleased.
my old times were 12.6@ 115.5(best) with 330/336.
new times are 12.7@ 118.89 with 409/368.
im stumped on this, i think there has to be something wrong. i even tried to ease on it so i could hook up but still wasnt getting the times i should be getting.
how can 3k only give me 3mph faster. Yes,i know i need slicks or at least DR but still.
the guys ive seen online with just a cam are running high 11`s(11.8`s) at like 120.
yes there on DR but is that really holding me back that much?
my old times were 12.6@ 115.5(best) with 330/336.
new times are 12.7@ 118.89 with 409/368.
im stumped on this, i think there has to be something wrong. i even tried to ease on it so i could hook up but still wasnt getting the times i should be getting.
how can 3k only give me 3mph faster. Yes,i know i need slicks or at least DR but still.
the guys ive seen online with just a cam are running high 11`s(11.8`s) at like 120.
yes there on DR but is that really holding me back that much?
Yes, tires are the key. I ran 11.87@116mph in a S13 with a SR20 that made 365whp. If you are trapping 119mph then you should be in the 11's. With a 1.70 60' you would have ran a 11.6-11.7(full second quicker) with that trap speed. Get you some 255/50/16 MT DR's or some ET streets.
Here is a time slip from my 2.0L car with a little 53mm turbo at 21psi. It did weigh 2580lbs w/o driver. I ran the 11.87 with a 1.69 60'.
07-08-2010, 04:07 PM
#17
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im going to the sac raceway.
my weight without driver is 2880.
when i was 330whp my 60 was 1.9
now my 60 is....2.6 lol
and yes even with easen on it i even spin into 4th when granny shifting haha
my weight without driver is 2880.
when i was 330whp my 60 was 1.9
now my 60 is....2.6 lol
and yes even with easen on it i even spin into 4th when granny shifting haha
07-08-2010, 05:06 PM
#19
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its very rare that sac does any track prep and can be very slick at times, those 60's are not entirely your fault. though you should at least take partial blame.
