AES 442ci LS stroker on the dyno
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Been working with a customer on adding a torquey street driven LS engine to his 4th gen Camaro. We settled on a 442ci LS7 blocked stroker with TFS 235 heads, and camshaft with street manners, 11.5:1 compression.
LS7 Engine block
Manley pistons -11cc 4.130" bore size
Total Seal moly piston rings
Callies Compstar 4.125" Crankshaft
Callies Compstar 6.125" H beams
Calico coated Clevite H bearings
Trick Flow 235cc heads
Yella Terra 1.7 rockers
Comp Cam, 244/248 .612/.615 114º LSA
Ran it in with a Carburetor to break in the engine,
get some baseline numbers. Everything proved well till we found a problem with the MSD 6010 box cutting spark at 6300rpm, i'm looking into it. We've tried many configurations on the rev limiter, timing etc., tried the modules instead, same 6300 rpm timing light shut off.
So far we're at 650hp@6300, 581tq@5100, I expect we have another 1,000 rpm left in it. Still have the engine on the dyno may make some pulls this weekend after NMCA.
LS7 Engine block
Manley pistons -11cc 4.130" bore size
Total Seal moly piston rings
Callies Compstar 4.125" Crankshaft
Callies Compstar 6.125" H beams
Calico coated Clevite H bearings
Trick Flow 235cc heads
Yella Terra 1.7 rockers
Comp Cam, 244/248 .612/.615 114º LSA
Ran it in with a Carburetor to break in the engine,
get some baseline numbers. Everything proved well till we found a problem with the MSD 6010 box cutting spark at 6300rpm, i'm looking into it. We've tried many configurations on the rev limiter, timing etc., tried the modules instead, same 6300 rpm timing light shut off.
So far we're at 650hp@6300, 581tq@5100, I expect we have another 1,000 rpm left in it. Still have the engine on the dyno may make some pulls this weekend after NMCA.
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/dynamometer-results-comparisons/242799d1279153697-aes-442ci-ls-stroker-dyno-img_3910.jpg)
Last edited by AES Racing; 07-14-2010 at 10:13 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We tested the rev limiter, it does same thing, It shuts off spark entirely, so its pretty useless rev limiter.
part throttle engine was smooth as a civic, dialed in 28º cross the board. Not a bad setup if that bug can get fixed.
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This build was not about getting maximum hp I know Fraser would have liked to have specked a much larger cam but I wanted something that wasn't falling out of tune all the time and shaking every nut and bolt loose in the car.
#17
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting.. I obviously don't know all the little details of the motor, but if I stick the details you provided in to performance trends engine analyzer, I get almost perfect numbers with your dyno, except the peaks are off. Obviously some things I can see right off the bat like the EWP, no mechanical fan ect and can account for those in the proggram. I took a guess on header size and stuck it at 1 7/8 and 30" long.
568ftlbs @ 5,400
654hp @ 6,600
I have found EA to be fairly accurate with other combos I have seen, at least as far as power goes. The one thing that seems to be off though is where peak power is made, just like in this case. It is always 300-500rpm higher than it really is.
Thanks for the info..
568ftlbs @ 5,400
654hp @ 6,600
I have found EA to be fairly accurate with other combos I have seen, at least as far as power goes. The one thing that seems to be off though is where peak power is made, just like in this case. It is always 300-500rpm higher than it really is.
Thanks for the info..
#18
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gateway International Raceway
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting.. I obviously don't know all the little details of the motor, but if I stick the details you provided in to performance trends engine analyzer, I get almost perfect numbers with your dyno, except the peaks are off. Obviously some things I can see right off the bat like the EWP, no mechanical fan ect and can account for those in the proggram. I took a guess on header size and stuck it at 1 7/8 and 30" long.
568ftlbs @ 5,400
654hp @ 6,600
I have found EA to be fairly accurate with other combos I have seen, at least as far as power goes. The one thing that seems to be off though is where peak power is made, just like in this case. It is always 300-500rpm higher than it really is.
Thanks for the info..
568ftlbs @ 5,400
654hp @ 6,600
I have found EA to be fairly accurate with other combos I have seen, at least as far as power goes. The one thing that seems to be off though is where peak power is made, just like in this case. It is always 300-500rpm higher than it really is.
Thanks for the info..
#20
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
I take it the calculation part is quicker with the full version? When its calculating numbers on the demo version it takes about 2-3 mintues.
I typically find with these analyzers the numbers and peaks maybe off, but the gains made with changes (compression, camshaft, cfm etc) are fairly accurate.