dynapack vs dynojet?
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
dynapack vs dynojet
i will be getting my new motor tuned here in the next few months my original tune was done at tsp (excellent shop =]) on the dynojet but thats a 7hr drive from austin id hate to make again i heard about reckart here but i noticed he uses a dynapack?
anyone have and info or experience? with these how do the readings compare? thanks
i will be getting my new motor tuned here in the next few months my original tune was done at tsp (excellent shop =]) on the dynojet but thats a 7hr drive from austin id hate to make again i heard about reckart here but i noticed he uses a dynapack?
anyone have and info or experience? with these how do the readings compare? thanks
#2
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
dynapack vs dynojet
i will be getting my new motor tuned here in the next few months my original tune was done at tsp (excellent shop =]) on the dynojet but thats a 7hr drive from austin id hate to make again i heard about reckart here but i noticed he uses a dynapack?
anyone have and info or experience? with these how do the readings compare? thanks
i will be getting my new motor tuned here in the next few months my original tune was done at tsp (excellent shop =]) on the dynojet but thats a 7hr drive from austin id hate to make again i heard about reckart here but i noticed he uses a dynapack?
anyone have and info or experience? with these how do the readings compare? thanks
Point is with heavier rims and tires your DynoJet numbers may be lower than a Dynopack, otherwise they should be pretty close.
Good luck....
-Tony
#3
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have been on both types here with very similar results, however heavy rims and tires will lower Dynojet readings which is a variable thats not effected with the Dynapack because its a hub dyno with the rear hub bolted directly to the power absorber of the dyno.
Point is with heavier rims and tires your DynoJet numbers may be lower than a Dynopack, otherwise they should be pretty close.
Good luck....
-Tony
Point is with heavier rims and tires your DynoJet numbers may be lower than a Dynopack, otherwise they should be pretty close.
Good luck....
-Tony
#4
TECH Addict
iTrader: (39)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My tuner (Rick @ Synergy) uses a dyna pack. Like Tony said, its a hub driven dyno, so it removes the wheel variable.
Only comparison i have numbers wise is my wife's cammed, bolt on WS.6. On MTI's dynojet, with their tune it made 386rwhp/352rwtq. On the dynapack, the only change was a tune from Rick at it made 392/368. I know the tune can play a big role, but its a 6hp/tq difference. Id say the numbers are pretty close.
Only comparison i have numbers wise is my wife's cammed, bolt on WS.6. On MTI's dynojet, with their tune it made 386rwhp/352rwtq. On the dynapack, the only change was a tune from Rick at it made 392/368. I know the tune can play a big role, but its a 6hp/tq difference. Id say the numbers are pretty close.
#5
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My tuner (Rick @ Synergy) uses a dyna pack. Like Tony said, its a hub driven dyno, so it removes the wheel variable.
Only comparison i have numbers wise is my wife's cammed, bolt on WS.6. On MTI's dynojet, with their tune it made 386rwhp/352rwtq. On the dynapack, the only change was a tune from Rick at it made 392/368. I know the tune can play a big role, but its a 6hp/tq difference. Id say the numbers are pretty close.
Only comparison i have numbers wise is my wife's cammed, bolt on WS.6. On MTI's dynojet, with their tune it made 386rwhp/352rwtq. On the dynapack, the only change was a tune from Rick at it made 392/368. I know the tune can play a big role, but its a 6hp/tq difference. Id say the numbers are pretty close.
#6
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do all my tuning on a Dynapack.. Its a great tuning tool and like mentioned above it takes out all variables such as wheel weight, strap tension, etc.
Very easy to steady state tune with the Dynapack.. Probably the best tuning tool I have used, besides the tuning software itself obviously.
Very easy to steady state tune with the Dynapack.. Probably the best tuning tool I have used, besides the tuning software itself obviously.
#7
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do all my tuning on a Dynapack.. Its a great tuning tool and like mentioned above it takes out all variables such as wheel weight, strap tension, etc.
Very easy to steady state tune with the Dynapack.. Probably the best tuning tool I have used, besides the tuning software itself obviously.
Very easy to steady state tune with the Dynapack.. Probably the best tuning tool I have used, besides the tuning software itself obviously.