LS2 427n/a #'s not what I thought
#21
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a comparison (take with a grain of salt). Buddies 402 with stage 1.5 5.3 heads (from TSP), 90 Fast (unported), 1 3/4 headers into 3 inch, 85mm Maf and 10.8 to 1 compression. I specked a cam for it that was 236/242 and the motor made 460 (SAE) thru a 9 inch and unlocked 4200 stall. The car ran 10.92 first pass (full weight, plus roll bar). I would expect with manual and stock rear end in there that 500 rwhp would not be out of the question.
So mixed parts can work if they work good together. I mean stage 1.5's...come on, that is a small head and valve size for a 402. They should be very close in flow and size to your old LS1 MTI heads. I would almost believe that you have some cyl sealing issues, or head sealing issue (as discussed above) at that low of hp.
So mixed parts can work if they work good together. I mean stage 1.5's...come on, that is a small head and valve size for a 402. They should be very close in flow and size to your old LS1 MTI heads. I would almost believe that you have some cyl sealing issues, or head sealing issue (as discussed above) at that low of hp.
#22
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that single 3 inch exhaust is a choke point as well, with open headers i bet it would gain 25-30 RWHP and TQ. 5900 peak doesnt seem to unrealistic with a 244 cam and 427 cubes, maybe a tad low.
#24
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heres the graph
I totally understand the restrictions of the headers and exhaust. I had those years ago when I did the motor and just didnt know that they wouldn't let this motor breath the way it needs to breath. Outside of 1 7/8 headers and say kooks new 3" true dual exhaust what should I look at as far as the set up i have now. Im not against getting a bigger lid maf tb and intake but keeping with what i have now what would b next.?
#26
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what is the SCR and DCR of that combo....? it maybe too low with that size cam...
I would also shoot for an ABDC @ .05 of 53 to 54 degrees. This will allow 6300 (rpm power peak with the plastic manifold and your cubic inches)....
I would also shoot for an ABDC @ .05 of 53 to 54 degrees. This will allow 6300 (rpm power peak with the plastic manifold and your cubic inches)....
#27
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here is what I have. resleved ls2 ported/polished ls1 heads 244/244 612/612 mti s1 cam 90/90fast 1 3/4 headers 3" y pipe gmmg exhaust. numbers came back at 455/460. was thinking and wanting over 500. all thru a m6 car peaked quick at 5800-5900. Guy that did the tuning and dyno said it makes it power quick.
with that said I know there are better heads and maybe even a diff cam that would get me there. I just dont know where to start. any info would be apperciated
with that said I know there are better heads and maybe even a diff cam that would get me there. I just dont know where to start. any info would be apperciated
#29
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
I would not say the FAST 90 is the big problem; its still a nice intake and plp were running stroker way before the 102mm was release. Of course you would gain with a ported 90, and 102mm version would be better but I dont think you should invest there for now.
Get started with bigger headers/4 inch ORY with a cutout or true duals.
Then if youre not happy, call a sponsor for a custom cam for your combo. I think that having a higher torque number with a 6 speed shows that the cam might be just too small...
Get started with bigger headers/4 inch ORY with a cutout or true duals.
Then if youre not happy, call a sponsor for a custom cam for your combo. I think that having a higher torque number with a 6 speed shows that the cam might be just too small...
#30
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lampe, Mo
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
did anyone get a chance to run a leakdown test yet? I honestly think you are being robbed with those cylinder heads and camshaft. Invest the money into your heads and cam, and you will make great numbers, even with the FAST 90 and 1 3/4" headers..
There is so much better technology and port designs out today.. I would really consider unloading your heads and moving up to a quality, optimized head/cam combo for this build. You could probably get 1000 dollars out of those heads, 200 out of that cam, and thats really like getting 50% off of your new stuff..
At the very minimum, pull those heads and send them to AI. They will get the most out of your current cylinder heads. As far as the OEM castings, they do amazing work, and at a great price.
Honestly, your 427 is way down on power. Definitely being held back on both the intake and exhaust sides of things, but I think the dead weight is the cylinder heads.
There is so much better technology and port designs out today.. I would really consider unloading your heads and moving up to a quality, optimized head/cam combo for this build. You could probably get 1000 dollars out of those heads, 200 out of that cam, and thats really like getting 50% off of your new stuff..
At the very minimum, pull those heads and send them to AI. They will get the most out of your current cylinder heads. As far as the OEM castings, they do amazing work, and at a great price.
Honestly, your 427 is way down on power. Definitely being held back on both the intake and exhaust sides of things, but I think the dead weight is the cylinder heads.
#33
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's an unscientific was to see if your engine is even close on DCR. Take cranking cyl pressure check. Ls1's on 92 octane like up to 200-210 psi. This is a real general number, so don't shoot the messenger on this one. I don't like throwing this out there as gauges and cranking time can change this number easily. But, if you’re at like 160 then you could be wrong events plus poor sealing engine. Leak down will tell you the condition of the cyls and valve seal. I also don't remember MTI specking cams using SCR and coming up with correct DCR/valve events. They were more of a general off the shelf cam for certain combos.
#34
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, basics...what is the Compression ratio of your engine? and, do you have a cam card? I would expect since MTI (in Houston is now gone) that the grind know longer exist. Just thought I would ask. S1 grind was probably a 4 degree advance? with maybeE 286-292 Base duration..
Last edited by jimbob; 08-25-2011 at 02:07 PM.
#35
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lampe, Mo
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How can he spec out a cam if this guy does not know all the required info. Having been specking out cams before the site was started; I already have him a starting place for the correct valve events with that manifold. "SCR," rod length, peak rpm, gear ratio, intended use; longevity of springs and even cooling requirements/upgrades goes into a correct formula for costumer. Since the Torques numbers are not that far off (for an engine making 500 at the wheels), it more than likely is a combination of things. Incorrect cam events, poor seal on cyl/valves. The other distracters like 1 3/4 headers and 3 inch merge are not going to gain you much on such a low powered engine, seen way too many over the years jump on these only to find 10-15 hp. Not saying they won't help but not the cause of 50+hp loss.
Here's an unscientific was to see if your engine is even close on DCR. Take cranking cyl pressure check. Ls1's on 92 octane like up to 200-210 psi. This is a real general number, so don't shoot the messenger on this one. I don't like throwing this out there as gauges and cranking time can change this number easily. But, if you’re at like 160 then you could be wrong events plus poor sealing engine. Leak down will tell you the condition of the cyls and valve seal. I also don't remember MTI specking cams using SCR and coming up with correct DCR/valve events. They were more of a general off the shelf cam for certain combos.
Here's an unscientific was to see if your engine is even close on DCR. Take cranking cyl pressure check. Ls1's on 92 octane like up to 200-210 psi. This is a real general number, so don't shoot the messenger on this one. I don't like throwing this out there as gauges and cranking time can change this number easily. But, if you’re at like 160 then you could be wrong events plus poor sealing engine. Leak down will tell you the condition of the cyls and valve seal. I also don't remember MTI specking cams using SCR and coming up with correct DCR/valve events. They were more of a general off the shelf cam for certain combos.
Well said, jimbob.
#36
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, basics...what is the Compression ratio of your engine? and, do you have a cam card? I would expect since MTI (in Houston is now gone) that the grind know longer exist. Just thought I would ask. S1 grind was probably a 4 degree advance? with maybeE 286-292 Base duration..
The motor to me runs very good, never had issues with it. I have never done a leak down test but i will once i replace fuel pump this coming week.
Last edited by SpinsB; 08-25-2011 at 02:43 PM. Reason: frustration
#37
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 5.0
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1 ^^^ Jimbob.
a custom cam will get you where you need to better for the least $$
basically if you don't have money to get different heads and intake, taylor the cam to what you have
plus you have a pontiac, call that motor a 428 haha
a custom cam will get you where you need to better for the least $$
basically if you don't have money to get different heads and intake, taylor the cam to what you have
plus you have a pontiac, call that motor a 428 haha
#38
TECH Senior Member
#40
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
again i didnt ask nor know anything back then like I do now. compression no clue, card for cam nope. @ the time i was excited to be getting a motor with the hopes of big horse power. I understand now that alot of things have to go together for all that to happen. Im working back wards here trying to NOT blow more $$ in the wrong areas.
The motor to me runs very good, never had issues with it. I have never done a leak down test but i will once i replace fuel pump this coming week.
The motor to me runs very good, never had issues with it. I have never done a leak down test but i will once i replace fuel pump this coming week.