99 camaro vortech supercharged dyno results
01-11-2012, 05:38 PM
#1
99 camaro vortech supercharged dyno results well this was with the stock converter unlocked and a 10 bolt with 3.23 gears @ 8.5-9 pis, how does it look??? Cant seem to post it worth a crap from my email, damn...https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachmen...1&d=1326324900
01-11-2012, 05:58 PM
#3
yeah, its 449.96hp and 438tq./ I have it in my email thats originally like 3.14mb but tech wont allow files that big. I had to use photoshop to downsize it. Any way to get around that?
Last edited by JRENIGAR; 01-11-2012 at 07:39 PM.
Trending Topics
01-11-2012, 07:50 PM
#8
No it isn't. Look at the upper left hand corner of the dyno sheet.
See "CF: STD"?
That means the Standard correction factor has been applied. Correction factors are used for repeatability/comparability to show what the output is under "standard" conditions. There is also the newer SAE correction factor which is considered more accurate (it's actually been updated at least once IIRC). They did him a "favor" by using STD. SAE will usually deliver a little lower number.
That's a good dyno result. The car below in my sig has a Vortech V9 G trim and put down 465 RWHP @ 9 psi. It has the spectacle lid, ZO6 MAF, BBK TB and minor exhaust mods, but still has factory exhaust manifolds and OEM cats - if you can believe that.
See "CF: STD"?
That means the Standard correction factor has been applied. Correction factors are used for repeatability/comparability to show what the output is under "standard" conditions. There is also the newer SAE correction factor which is considered more accurate (it's actually been updated at least once IIRC). They did him a "favor" by using STD. SAE will usually deliver a little lower number.
That's a good dyno result. The car below in my sig has a Vortech V9 G trim and put down 465 RWHP @ 9 psi. It has the spectacle lid, ZO6 MAF, BBK TB and minor exhaust mods, but still has factory exhaust manifolds and OEM cats - if you can believe that.
01-11-2012, 08:11 PM
#9
I believe it, Mine also had a belt on it that was slightly too long because of a pulley change done from 3.12 to 2.95 to get more boost. It made 6lbs with the 3.12 on my first dyno and I wasnt happy, so on the 2.95 went and the rest is history. The car ran 12.08 @ 117 weighing close to 3900# with all the stereo and other stuff in it, as I didnt unload it for the races. It peaked @ 8.35lbs boost on the dyno run above but since changing belts my guage shows a full 9lbs now. Feels strong on the streets, especially when it breaks the 315 sumitomos free @50mph from a 2nd gear roll with 3.23's and the stock converter. BTW, what times does that car run and do you wanna come off that lid anytime soon?
01-11-2012, 09:22 PM
#10
Banned
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hinesville GA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No it isn't. Look at the upper left hand corner of the dyno sheet.
See "CF: STD"?
That means the Standard correction factor has been applied. Correction factors are used for repeatability/comparability to show what the output is under "standard" conditions. There is also the newer SAE correction factor which is considered more accurate (it's actually been updated at least once IIRC). They did him a "favor" by using STD. SAE will usually deliver a little lower number.
That's a good dyno result. The car below in my sig has a Vortech V9 G trim and put down 465 RWHP @ 9 psi. It has the spectacle lid, ZO6 MAF, BBK TB and minor exhaust mods, but still has factory exhaust manifolds and OEM cats - if you can believe that.
See "CF: STD"?
That means the Standard correction factor has been applied. Correction factors are used for repeatability/comparability to show what the output is under "standard" conditions. There is also the newer SAE correction factor which is considered more accurate (it's actually been updated at least once IIRC). They did him a "favor" by using STD. SAE will usually deliver a little lower number.
That's a good dyno result. The car below in my sig has a Vortech V9 G trim and put down 465 RWHP @ 9 psi. It has the spectacle lid, ZO6 MAF, BBK TB and minor exhaust mods, but still has factory exhaust manifolds and OEM cats - if you can believe that.
:f lipbird:
01-12-2012, 08:27 AM
#12
I do not know what my car runs. It has a SPEC III clutch and PP, but stock DS and stock 10 bolt so it doesn't go to the track. It's also a garage queen with 13K original miles, so it's a total poser car.
It has been "compared" to other cars, however, and hangs with mid-high 11 sec rides.Per your PM, here's a shot with the larger couplers and ZO6 MAF installed:
01-12-2012, 04:30 PM
#14
Haha. I'm keeping the lid! It's the first one that Spectacle built. I got the opportunity to buy it because I helped out with their R&D, using my car as an independent dyno test subject.
I do not know what my car runs. It has a SPEC III clutch and PP, but stock DS and stock 10 bolt so it doesn't go to the track. It's also a garage queen with 13K original miles, so it's a total poser car. It has been "compared" to other cars, however, and hangs with mid-high 11 sec rides.
Per your PM, here's a shot with the larger couplers and ZO6 MAF installed:
I do not know what my car runs. It has a SPEC III clutch and PP, but stock DS and stock 10 bolt so it doesn't go to the track. It's also a garage queen with 13K original miles, so it's a total poser car.
It has been "compared" to other cars, however, and hangs with mid-high 11 sec rides.Per your PM, here's a shot with the larger couplers and ZO6 MAF installed:
01-15-2012, 10:19 AM
#17
That wouldnt be good, please explain. I have been monitoring it and have seen NO kr at all while driving on the interstate and doing WOT pulls from like 60-120 or so when traffic allows it. Im not saying it hasnt been there n gone and I just missed it though. BTW I dont condone street racing anywhere near other cars. Safety of innocent motorists first and foremost...
Last edited by JRENIGAR; 01-15-2012 at 10:24 AM.
01-15-2012, 10:31 AM
#18
I just picked up a good low mileage set of 799 heads off of an 08 silverado 5.3 engine for $150 yesterday. My plan was to do an ls6 cam as well but Im open to other low cost alternatives that wont kill dd mileage. BTW I cant run dr's or a stall because Its driven in the rain at 65-70 so Im looking for top end increases more than off the line traction till I retire it from dd duty. Im already breaking the tires loose @ 50 mph in 2nd gear with 3.23 gears and 315's in the back, done it twice this morning on the way to work...
01-15-2012, 04:58 PM
#19
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just picked up a good low mileage set of 799 heads off of an 08 silverado 5.3 engine for $150 yesterday. My plan was to do an ls6 cam as well but Im open to other low cost alternatives that wont kill dd mileage. BTW I cant run dr's or a stall because Its driven in the rain at 65-70 so Im looking for top end increases more than off the line traction till I retire it from dd duty. Im already breaking the tires loose @ 50 mph in 2nd gear with 3.23 gears and 315's in the back, done it twice this morning on the way to work...
01-15-2012, 05:27 PM
#20
They are the same as the 243 heads that I was told is a nice hp upgrade with a ls6 cam if I dont want to run a stall in the near future, but??? Should I sell the 799 heads and not use them? The reason I was going to use them is the fact that my blower is about out of steam so no need to lower cr, just increase efficiency to gain hp, or is this not the way to go???