LQ9, torquer V2,Hookers 1 7/8. FAST 92/102. UPDATED with TFS 215 Heads
#41
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If its still at 78 mm maf opening then you are definitly choking the fast. What is also weird from friends experience that after there 102 install it went lean as hell. Open that intake tract and post up, def in for numbers.
#42
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that's exactly what i thought, the car should run leaner after the IM install, but no the AFR stay the same...i really don't know if it's in the combo or i did something wrong here...i have NEVER seen anyone in this board losing power anywhere across the board from changing to FAST 102
here's what me and Glen thinking: the IM has the capacity of stuffing more air into the heads, BUT with lower velocity since it's bigger. that's why when the intake got enough velocity AKA high RPM range, it really shines over the LS6 intake. Correct me if i'm wrong.
i'm open to suggestions of what i need to do next.
here's what me and Glen thinking: the IM has the capacity of stuffing more air into the heads, BUT with lower velocity since it's bigger. that's why when the intake got enough velocity AKA high RPM range, it really shines over the LS6 intake. Correct me if i'm wrong.
i'm open to suggestions of what i need to do next.
#43
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I beleive your correct. There is so much more volume to fill up the new intake with air hence low rpm but takes longer due to sucking through a straw rather than tsp maf Haha. The way I think of things totally elementary but it works.
#45
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
anybody else have comments on this? i'm really stumped..i'm thinking right now the only way to gain more power is with heads like AFR or TFS, i'm thinking swapping the cam, but if i do that might as well do the head. the fk up part is my wallet is $1400 thinner now
#47
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i may take it to the thunder valley tomorrow night. i'm still on denial that fast setup is actually lose power everywhere across the board compared to ls6, especially when everyone's been saying that they gain anywhere from 3000 rpm, the graph doesn't lie and the numbers are corrected, o well..
#52
If you can look at the WOT log, it will tell you alot. When you see the map pressure drop more than way 8 kpa from start to finish, or it tanks at one spot, then you know something is amiss. I would ask to look at that first before selling anything.
#53
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was kidding when i said i want to sell them, i'll keep them, i know they will help if i go bigger cube, disappointed with the result.
here's the pic of the MAF that's in the car, seems to me it's the 90mm one
here's the pic of lid
and here's beneath my air filter
here's the pic of the MAF that's in the car, seems to me it's the 90mm one
here's the pic of lid
and here's beneath my air filter
#54
Interesting. Seems that is not a bad maf. Looks like it could be the Z06 maf. Since there is no screen in it. But if you are going to the 4" then it will def flow more. Hard to say if you will need it, but they will have to do quite a bit to scale the maf table back.
More could be said if you could either look at the dyno pull logs or even be able to post them up.
More could be said if you could either look at the dyno pull logs or even be able to post them up.
#57
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
Weather on 3/9/12 for best pull with LS6 intake:
Temp 58, Humidity 23%, Baro 30.40, DA 921
Weather on 4/4/12 for best pull with FAST 102 intake:
Temp 63, Humidity 54%, Baro 29.77, DA 2052
Also Mustang Dynos don't have the same type of correction factors that Dynojets have.
Temp 58, Humidity 23%, Baro 30.40, DA 921
Weather on 4/4/12 for best pull with FAST 102 intake:
Temp 63, Humidity 54%, Baro 29.77, DA 2052
Also Mustang Dynos don't have the same type of correction factors that Dynojets have.