LQ9, torquer V2,Hookers 1 7/8. FAST 92/102. UPDATED with TFS 215 Heads
#102
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to put this thread to rest i've changed several things and was surprised that i actually gained back the lost power on midrange RPM.
here's what i changed:
FAST 92mm TB
FTP 98mm
85mm MAF
now i gained back all the power i lost from ls6 intake, and gain after 5400 RPM, even though i changed my lid and MAF i think the part that mostly accountable for the gain is the TB. not saying 102mm TB is too big for every case but it did for my case.
/thread
here's what i changed:
FAST 92mm TB
FTP 98mm
85mm MAF
now i gained back all the power i lost from ls6 intake, and gain after 5400 RPM, even though i changed my lid and MAF i think the part that mostly accountable for the gain is the TB. not saying 102mm TB is too big for every case but it did for my case.
/thread
#107
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm kinda late on seeing this thread, figured i'd throw some numbers your way, but dynojet
I put a lq9 in a camaro with tv2 cam and ls6 intake with pacesetters(stock 317 heads). 6 speed car. Made 425rwhp, I cant remember tq numbers, it was high 300s. Made 602hp and 630 ftlb on some nitrous too. Loved the spray
I put a lq9 in a camaro with tv2 cam and ls6 intake with pacesetters(stock 317 heads). 6 speed car. Made 425rwhp, I cant remember tq numbers, it was high 300s. Made 602hp and 630 ftlb on some nitrous too. Loved the spray
#113
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
O well, what happened happen, live and learn I guess LOL. At least the results that I posted on this thread are backed up with dyno facts not some random physics..