Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

2013 GT500....609 RWHP Stock!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2012, 09:31 PM
  #61  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
CS2 Sasuke XD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Davenport
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Give Ford credit where it's due. The mustang is something Ford, Ford racing, (the gt500) Shelby, all made on their own. From the design, chassis and motor if I am not mistake, (I could be) But the new Camaro is a Holden Ute/Commodore platform with a new body, nothing original for the car that really makes it a Camaro but the body design. Even the Holdens had LSX power house. But Ford is doing amazing things in every catagory they can off of a clean slate with the Mustangs. Truely a nice car, the GT500. One thing I can say though. For the Price, I'd rather stick with my 3k firebird and build the motor for the fraction of that cost and just have fun in it.
Old 07-10-2012, 10:00 PM
  #62  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Higgs Boson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CS2 Sasuke XD
Give Ford credit where it's due. The mustang is something Ford, Ford racing, (the gt500) Shelby, all made on their own. From the design, chassis and motor if I am not mistake, (I could be) But the new Camaro is a Holden Ute/Commodore platform with a new body, nothing original for the car that really makes it a Camaro but the body design. Even the Holdens had LSX power house. But Ford is doing amazing things in every catagory they can off of a clean slate with the Mustangs. Truely a nice car, the GT500. One thing I can say though. For the Price, I'd rather stick with my 3k firebird and build the motor for the fraction of that cost and just have fun in it.
gm has owned Holden since the 1930s. the Holden commodore platform has been a gm platform all along.
Old 07-13-2012, 03:37 PM
  #63  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
TORK?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

We've been using the 15% driveline loss equation for years and years. Is there a possibility they are making the transmission, driveshaft, rearend more efficient?

The new GT500 has a carbon fiber driveshaft. That adds to the lack of drivetrain loss at least a little bit.
Old 07-13-2012, 06:42 PM
  #64  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Higgs Boson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TORK?
We've been using the 15% driveline loss equation for years and years. Is there a possibility they are making the transmission, driveshaft, rearend more efficient?

The new GT500 has a carbon fiber driveshaft. That adds to the lack of drivetrain loss at least a little bit.
only one way to tell. chassis dyno, pull the motor, engine dyno - all within a couple hours. then you will know for sure. it can be done with a competent team with specific roles.
Old 07-15-2012, 07:21 AM
  #65  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I like the look of the gt500 alot. 609hp is nice,but the car is so heavy. I'm about 60hp less n/a but much lighter by far. My boys dad has a new gt500 and we think it a matter of time before the old man mods her.
Old 08-09-2012, 09:45 AM
  #66  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,292
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

We're making some good progress on the pulley tune, heres a little teaser...

703 ft/lbs, at 2840 RPM.

Got torque?
Old 08-09-2012, 04:51 PM
  #67  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,292
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Car left today, making 680 rwhp/712 ft/lbs....and there is still a little more in it.

The stock TB has become a restriction, so thats next in an effort to get up past 700 rwhp
Old 08-09-2012, 09:14 PM
  #68  
TECH Regular
 
GMRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 450
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport
Car left today, making 680 rwhp/712 ft/lbs....and there is still a little more in it.

The stock TB has become a restriction, so thats next in an effort to get up past 700 rwhp
Those things are pushing 15 psi stock with the 2300 right?
How far do you think you can push it before it starts to loose efficiency?
Old 08-10-2012, 08:28 AM
  #69  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,292
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GMRL
Those things are pushing 15 psi stock with the 2300 right?
How far do you think you can push it before it starts to loose efficiency?
No....stock it makes about 10 psi
With just some tuning we saw a slight boost increase by keeping the bypass stuff shut down, which accounts for some of the massive gains we saw in the tune. With the pulley this car is at about 15-16 psi now.

Thanks
Old 08-10-2012, 04:51 PM
  #70  
TECH Regular
 
GMRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 450
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport
No....stock it makes about 10 psi
With just some tuning we saw a slight boost increase by keeping the bypass stuff shut down, which accounts for some of the massive gains we saw in the tune. With the pulley this car is at about 15-16 psi now.

Thanks
Really? I just read on like 10 different sites, and they all say 15?
Old 08-11-2012, 12:04 PM
  #71  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,292
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GMRL
Really? I just read on like 10 different sites, and they all say 15?
This was according to our tuner and based on what he saw in the logs

I looked and the internet told me 12, 13, and 15 psi....don't mater whats on the web though, all that really counts is how much pressure actually builds in the manifold.
Old 08-30-2012, 05:47 PM
  #72  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,474
Received 907 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

I rode in in one of these last week. These things are monsters. Couldn't imagine one with some tuning. My only complaint about the car was the ridiculous amount of road noise in the car. I don't know if its the tires or what. Sick car none the less. The wife wants one as do I but I can't swing the 60k price tag right now.
Old 08-30-2012, 07:22 PM
  #73  
FormerVendor
 
Robert@G-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The one we just finished made just under 15 psi stock.
Old 09-12-2012, 11:33 PM
  #74  
On The Tree
 
Stang2Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Georgetown, TX
Posts: 106
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

It's been trapping 128.xx mph bone-stock with a 3850# race weight, not including driver. Bitch about ET all you like...a $500 pair of 275 MT ET DRs or bias plies would fix that. Trapping 128 at that fat weight takes some power and engineering my friends...

600whp is right about there.

Check my sources if you like - Car & Driver, along with every other car mag (it seems) just did shootouts and comparos between the 2013 Shelb and the ZL1 Camaro. Results may surprise you, regardless of which American car flag you salute...
Old 09-13-2012, 12:16 AM
  #75  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
4U2BNVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BFE Nebraska
Posts: 212
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yea the zl1 was faster on a road course and the gt500 was quicker in the quarter. They need a wider tire on the gt500. Both cars are nice though.
Old 09-13-2012, 12:21 AM
  #76  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For those who haven't done homework on these, the problem with them getting down the track isn't just the tires, it's the gearing. You don't even get into 4th until about 135 mph. Running a car that heavy and not even being able to run out 3rd gear certainly isn't the way to go for performance. With bolt on's and a 4.10 gear (on the stock tire size that would put it at 6900rpm at 140mph) I expect 9's should be a common thing for them. Form GM to put the TVS1900 on the ZL1 is just plain stupid and they know it. There is a reason the ZR1 gets the correct blower size for the motor size. The ZL1 has independent rear suspension which has gotten it better press, but we all know that the boss is just plain faster. The ZL1 just needs to get the LS9 in a wet sump form and with a better baffled pan.

BTW, specs on the GT500

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2013_GT500_Specs.pdf



Quick Reply: 2013 GT500....609 RWHP Stock!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.