Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

A little disappointed...LS1+228R+PRC Stg 2.5 5.3s+FAST92 = 421/391

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2012, 12:20 AM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default A little disappointed...LS1+228R+PRC Stg 2.5 5.3s+FAST92 = 421/391

This is in my C5. Just got it tuned. Tuner spent a lot of time getting everything out of it he could. It liked being a little fat, he suspects his wideband was reading a little rich, going off the 02 voltage as a comparison. He tried pulling fuel out of it at high rpm but it lost a bunch of power, so he added it back in.

Stock shortblock has 78k miles on it. The head/cam setup is about 5 years old. I bought the car recently. It had an LS6 manifold and stock TB on it, plus a modded stock airbox with K&N filter and made 402/385 (with the tune that was in the car). The car does have longtubes and an offroad X pipe. I then added the FAST 92mm intake manifold, LS2 90mm TB, and an AFE cold air intake setup, and then had it tuned. I guess I expected maybe 35rwhp from adding this stuff. I was disappointed to only see a 19hp gain.

I guess my stock cube mild setup doesn't need a FAST manifold?

SAE numbers 421/391, STD numbers were 432/401.


Last edited by KrisR; 11-10-2012 at 12:51 AM.
Old 11-10-2012, 01:20 AM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What exhaust? why the pull stoped 6200rpm it was pulling maybe take it to 6500-6600rpm?
I really think with better A/F you can get a little more hp & tq.

I like the TQ curve and the numbers are not that far off with mild H/C I guess I expected 430-435rwhp
Old 11-10-2012, 06:34 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by venom ws7
What exhaust? why the pull stoped 6200rpm it was pulling maybe take it to 6500-6600rpm?
I really think with better A/F you can get a little more hp & tq.

I like the TQ curve and the numbers are not that far off with mild H/C I guess I expected 430-435rwhp
Pull #25 was taken to 6500. It leveled off there as you can see. Tried less fuel and it lost power so it was added back in. I don't know which catback is on it. A friend said it looks like a B&B? It's pretty quiet. A cutout might help.
Old 11-10-2012, 06:47 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I should add that my MAF was giving us some issues, and it ended up with a smoother curve (both air fuel and performance) with a speed density tune, which is what this is. The MAF is still in the intake tract though....might pick up a couple hp if I removed it?
Old 11-10-2012, 12:59 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

You can expect 35rwhp with a FAST/bigger TB/LID..on a happy dyno.

I picked up 14rwhp with a ported FAST 92/92TB tuned from a LS6/ported TB. Your results sound realistic. 19rwhp is pretty good for easy boltons.

But yeah, internet made me hoped my FAST setup would yield 35rwhp LOL
Old 11-10-2012, 06:46 PM
  #6  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

I think 15rwhp is about average gain for the FAST 92 over the LS6 even with heads/cam. Those heads aren't the greatest ever, but they are decent. 430rwhp sounds about right for that setup. To hit closer to 460, you'd need better heads, milled to hell, thinner gaskets, and all kinds of little tricks (EWP, roller rockers, etc). It adds up to a ton of cash for a few ponies.

I'm guessing the FAST had a better curve throughout (19 peak but perhaps more in the midrange?). Either way, it probably isn't super noticeable...
Old 11-10-2012, 07:42 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 55 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

small cam, small heads. I think you're right where you ought to be.
Old 11-11-2012, 12:42 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DietCoke
small cam, small heads. I think you're right where you ought to be.
Thanks, you are probably right. I see a lot of setups that make more but they usually have a bigger cam and 243-based heads.

Side note, I stayed ahead of a c6 Z06 twice last night from 50-130.... That was unexpected but fun.
Old 11-11-2012, 01:12 PM
  #9  
Teching In
 
AutoCruzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KrisR
Thanks, you are probably right. I see a lot of setups that make more but they usually have a bigger cam and 243-based heads.

Side note, I stayed ahead of a c6 Z06 twice last night from 50-130.... That was unexpected but fun.
I am no expert, but I couldn't help but to chime in.... At approximately 400+ rwhp you are averaging around $80-490 fwhp.... Now I understand that some people are never satisfied, but to have a streetable LS1 putting out that kind of juice you have done rather well.... You may also be pushing the limits of that engines endurance...

If you were able to even keep up with a late model Z06, let alone stay in front of him you have done very well and maybe should look into forced induction next. Please take it easy out there.... that's a serious machine you
are driving...!
Old 11-11-2012, 01:27 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

See this is why I NEVER trust a certain dyno number! OP your dyno said you made 420, but you stayed ahead of a ZO6 (I assume stock) which is every bit of 420 hp, and lighter. Now on "paper" you should lose, but in the real world you didn't...very interesting isn't it
Old 11-11-2012, 01:58 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
See this is why I NEVER trust a certain dyno number! OP your dyno said you made 420, but you stayed ahead of a ZO6 (I assume stock) which is every bit of 420 hp, and lighter. Now on "paper" you should lose, but in the real world you didn't...very interesting isn't it
C6 Z06 is lighter than my car? I have a 2000 FRC...I failed to mention that.
Old 11-11-2012, 02:01 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AutoCruzer
I am no expert, but I couldn't help but to chime in.... At approximately 400+ rwhp you are averaging around $80-490 fwhp.... Now I understand that some people are never satisfied, but to have a streetable LS1 putting out that kind of juice you have done rather well.... You may also be pushing the limits of that engines endurance...

If you were able to even keep up with a late model Z06, let alone stay in front of him you have done very well and maybe should look into forced induction next. Please take it easy out there.... that's a serious machine you
are driving...!
Thank you. My last car was a turbo '99 Mustang GT with just under 700whp so this isn't very fast to me. But I was pleasantly surprised last night.

And it is very driveable...I can lug it down in 6th gear at 55mph (1200rpm) uphill and it doesn't care, just grunts along.
Old 11-12-2012, 11:57 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
studderin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

number look fine. Most budget heads/cam setups make that, there alot of them out there.

The almost 20whp is good from the fast over LS6 in cuz your TB was unported.
35 is not gona happen, the bigger gains are when people do, 5-7 other little things you dont think about, or then dont tell you. That are 5 little 1-3hp changes done also with the "FAST XX and XX Tb " gains on a dyno..... airfilter, intake tube setup, maff, weather, cutouts, tires, clutch..ect changed too.
Old 11-16-2012, 10:29 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Uneverknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

KrisR.. I'm also from mn, who did you have tune the car? And I'm surprised you found a car to race this time of year. Anyways was it just a random car or is there some street scene stil happening, I've lost the street scene after porkys was closed.
Old 11-16-2012, 10:32 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
bestlude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i think you're right where you should be.. i made 430 with a torquer 2 and the same H/I combo with 4.10s ..
Old 11-16-2012, 10:44 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
anheuserbusch08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go with a g5x3 cam and port the heads and intake. 440+ easily
Old 11-17-2012, 09:19 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I also got 20rwhp from going from LS6 to FAST 92 with H/C.
Old 11-17-2012, 09:53 AM
  #18  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
reeperz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Car sounds like it runs strong. If you want more power sell the prc heads and get some aftermarket castings (afr, tfs, prc 215,) and a larger cam. The fast intake really shines after 6 grand. If you sold the heads and cam for 1200 and bouht a new combo you might be out a grand plus tuning. For mayby 25 more hp. Not worth it lol.. 100 shot with a tune 500+ rear wheel is a better option.
Old 11-18-2012, 06:59 PM
  #19  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Bo's 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those are some good numbers for a very mild cam.
Old 11-20-2012, 12:46 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Those numbers look pretty good to me. Your Tq looks better than mine. I only pulled 375rwtp but I was still using dual 2.5" ceramic cats and a 2.5" y to a 3" cat. Stock pulley and water pump. I have since replaced the y and cats but haven't been to the dyno since. Gears make a difference on the dyno too. I'm running a 4.10.


Quick Reply: A little disappointed...LS1+228R+PRC Stg 2.5 5.3s+FAST92 = 421/391



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.