06 C6 AI 226's and G6X3 dyno 486/447
01-29-2013, 12:05 PM
#1
06 C6 AI 226's and G6X3 dyno 486/447 Thought you guys may like this- was looking for 500rwhp but a little short.
06 M6 C6
FAST 102
90 ported TB
Halltech 107
G6X3
AI 226 243's stock compression
GM gaskets
Manton 11/32 7.450 PR (too long?)
Dynatech C6Z LT's
GHL C6Z exhaust
UD Pulley
Stock clutch and heavy C6Z chrome replica's after a 2hr drive to Vengeance-
The overlay was my previous EPS 234/242 cam and the new number is the G6X3-
I guess the next step will be TFS 225's at 62cc.
06 M6 C6
FAST 102
90 ported TB
Halltech 107
G6X3
AI 226 243's stock compression
GM gaskets
Manton 11/32 7.450 PR (too long?)
Dynatech C6Z LT's
GHL C6Z exhaust
UD Pulley
Stock clutch and heavy C6Z chrome replica's after a 2hr drive to Vengeance-
The overlay was my previous EPS 234/242 cam and the new number is the G6X3-
I guess the next step will be TFS 225's at 62cc.
01-29-2013, 12:42 PM
#3
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you picked up power all over the curve from an off the shelf cam vs an EPS custom grind? That's pretty interesting, usually you see the trend going to opposite direction. Mike can sure make magic happen with his laptop though.
Pretty stout numbers for a stock bottom end LS2, especially with the stock compression.
Pretty stout numbers for a stock bottom end LS2, especially with the stock compression.
01-29-2013, 12:54 PM
#4
So you picked up power all over the curve from an off the shelf cam vs an EPS custom grind? That's pretty interesting, usually you see the trend going to opposite direction. Mike can sure make magic happen with his laptop though.
Pretty stout numbers for a stock bottom end LS2, especially with the stock compression.
Pretty stout numbers for a stock bottom end LS2, especially with the stock compression.
He could have leaned it out and broke 490 but this is my dd and it needs to be safe. I think my push rods are too long also. Not bad..
Trending Topics
01-29-2013, 10:31 PM
#9
Thought you guys may like this- was looking for 500rwhp but a little short.
06 M6 C6
FAST 102
90 ported TB
Halltech 107
G6X3
AI 226 243's stock compression
GM gaskets
Manton 11/32 7.450 PR (too long?)
Dynatech C6Z LT's
GHL C6Z exhaust
UD Pulley
Stock clutch and heavy C6Z chrome replica's after a 2hr drive to Vengeance-
The overlay was my previous EPS 234/242 cam and the new number is the G6X3-
I guess the next step will be TFS 225's at 62cc.
06 M6 C6
FAST 102
90 ported TB
Halltech 107
G6X3
AI 226 243's stock compression
GM gaskets
Manton 11/32 7.450 PR (too long?)
Dynatech C6Z LT's
GHL C6Z exhaust
UD Pulley
Stock clutch and heavy C6Z chrome replica's after a 2hr drive to Vengeance-
The overlay was my previous EPS 234/242 cam and the new number is the G6X3-
I guess the next step will be TFS 225's at 62cc.
What's the LSA and lift on the 234/242?
01-30-2013, 01:09 PM
#13
Actually the drivability is better. Little to no surge at all with the Vengeance tuning it and you can lug around in 5th and 6th at will. It even recovers quick when bogging and launches smooth. Not 1 single complaint at all.
Wonder which would make more power TFS 225's or AI TFS 230's......
What do you guys think?
Last edited by JayplaySS; 01-30-2013 at 01:53 PM.
01-30-2013, 02:52 PM
#14
Actually the drivability is better. Little to no surge at all with the Vengeance tuning it and you can lug around in 5th and 6th at will. It even recovers quick when bogging and launches smooth. Not 1 single complaint at all.
Wonder which would make more power TFS 225's or AI TFS 230's......
What do you guys think?
Wonder which would make more power TFS 225's or AI TFS 230's......
What do you guys think?
01-30-2013, 03:48 PM
#15
Wonder which would make more power TFS 225's or AI TFS 230's......
What do you guys think?[/QUOTE]
I dont know, But I would think those two set of heads would be within 5 or so rwhp of each other. I do know when the TFS 225s are paired up with the G6x3, they are a proven combo. The TFS 225s would be my choice.
What do you guys think?[/QUOTE]
I dont know, But I would think those two set of heads would be within 5 or so rwhp of each other. I do know when the TFS 225s are paired up with the G6x3, they are a proven combo. The TFS 225s would be my choice.
01-30-2013, 04:41 PM
#16
Actually the drivability is better. Little to no surge at all with the Vengeance tuning it and you can lug around in 5th and 6th at will. It even recovers quick when bogging and launches smooth. Not 1 single complaint at all.
Wonder which would make more power TFS 225's or AI TFS 230's......
What do you guys think?
Wonder which would make more power TFS 225's or AI TFS 230's......
What do you guys think?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ae-497std.html
01-31-2013, 06:59 AM
#17
Im a big fan of AI and Id love to see more results from those heads. This is an impressive example. Similiar numbers to you but a smaller cam it looks like.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ae-497std.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ae-497std.html
I'm sure TFS 225's would perform better, my guess anyway. He also had the 102TB (NWTB)
My current setup made 499.1 uncorrected-
01-31-2013, 11:04 AM
#19
Actually the drivability is better. Little to no surge at all with the Vengeance tuning it and you can lug around in 5th and 6th at will. It even recovers quick when bogging and launches smooth. Not 1 single complaint at all.
