LS1/AFR 205'S/228R results
06-23-2013, 09:33 PM
#21
01ZOH6, youre comparing STD numbers...could all be the air. Not saying it is, but with just STD you cannot say it isnt. So yes, its extremely easy to argue with the uncorrected results you keep posting. Just switch to SAE and repost.
OP, im running that cam on a 114. It gave me +5whp over a 227R on a 114. I really like the sound, and on a 113 it should sound even better and give you a bit more torque. . .but I wouldnt expect huge gains. Getting away from XER lobes is definitely worth it though.
My 100MAF works great, but lots of folks including my tuner say it can cost hp. Again, no issues here, I put down good numbers, runs awesome.
If you too could convert to SAE comparisons would be more meaningful.
OP, im running that cam on a 114. It gave me +5whp over a 227R on a 114. I really like the sound, and on a 113 it should sound even better and give you a bit more torque. . .but I wouldnt expect huge gains. Getting away from XER lobes is definitely worth it though.
My 100MAF works great, but lots of folks including my tuner say it can cost hp. Again, no issues here, I put down good numbers, runs awesome.
If you too could convert to SAE comparisons would be more meaningful.
