Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Disappointing VR Ported FAST92 Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2013, 11:13 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by senicalj4579
You got exactly what I would expect. 10rwh across the board. I see no problem with that.
People just get their hopes up when some post gains of 30+ hp.
Old 07-08-2013, 11:18 PM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

10Rwhp over the entire graph.... Yes please!!!

I wouldn't be thinking 15Rw minimum with a 346 on just an intake swap... That is getting pretty high... 10-15Rw is what I would expect for a 102.
Old 07-08-2013, 11:21 PM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
455GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 355
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Ok thanks for your thoughts guys. I was just hoping for that magical 20whp number due to the intake being ported... But at the end of the day i have a damn strong ls1
Old 07-09-2013, 09:34 AM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

IIRC the porting they do is mostly just removing the bump in the runner and I'm not sure they take them apart. I could be wrong but it seems that was posted here with pics by someone who had it done.

If that's the case, it definitely seems on the lower side of right. If you had a setup that revved higher you would probably see higher gains but the ls6 should still be pretty efficient below 6500rpm.
Old 07-09-2013, 09:54 AM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
455GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 355
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
IIRC the porting they do is mostly just removing the bump in the runner and I'm not sure they take them apart. I could be wrong but it seems that was posted here with pics by someone who had it done.

If that's the case, it definitely seems on the lower side of right. If you had a setup that revved higher you would probably see higher gains but the ls6 should still be pretty efficient below 6500rpm.
Yes, that is indeed the case with not taking apart the manifold. Upon inspecting the port work, they go about 3-4" deep in each runner and appear to remove a "good" amount of material. As for the inlet, that appears to be heavily ported and goes almost halfway into the manifold itself...

Like I said, the work Vengeance did looks to be great, but I do think my "smallish" cam is holding back the potential of the heads/intake. Thinking about stepping up to the G5x3 on a 114lsa would really wake it up.
Old 07-09-2013, 10:22 AM
  #26  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Phil said that because there wasn't a whole lot to be gained. I doubt the way Vengeance ports it would hurt power.

Anyway, I was looking at your mod list again, and I think I know why it didn't hit a higher peak gain. A better exhaust and a cam with more overlap would probably show more gains.

Remember, the whole thing is just a giant airpump. Being able to evacuate the exhaust in the overlap phase is where the gains come in at 6k+. Having an exhaust that can't keep up or a cam that doesn't have a tremendously long overlap cycle will cut down on the peak numbers. I think the Y-Pipe and 1-3/4" headers are hurting you there. The TV2 has decent overlap though, so that should support the FAST making bigger gains uptop.
Old 07-09-2013, 10:48 AM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
455GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 355
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Phil said that because there wasn't a whole lot to be gained. I doubt the way Vengeance ports it would hurt power.

Anyway, I was looking at your mod list again, and I think I know why it didn't hit a higher peak gain. A better exhaust and a cam with more overlap would probably show more gains.

Remember, the whole thing is just a giant airpump. Being able to evacuate the exhaust in the overlap phase is where the gains come in at 6k+. Having an exhaust that can't keep up or a cam that doesn't have a tremendously long overlap cycle will cut down on the peak numbers. I think the Y-Pipe and 1-3/4" headers are hurting you there. The TV2 has decent overlap though, so that should support the FAST making bigger gains uptop.
You may be right, maybe some time down the road I will try the 1 7/8 headers with a cutout and see if it picks up any. But per my other thread, I'm really considering adding the meth injection to see what else can be had.
Old 07-10-2013, 11:52 AM
  #28  
Launching!
 
SteelCityYaga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Phil said that because there wasn't a whole lot to be gained.
Interesting because AI now offers porting of FAST Intakes.....
Old 07-10-2013, 11:56 AM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

There is definitely power to be had in the exhaust.
Old 07-11-2013, 05:37 PM
  #30  
On The Tree
 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Same results here...
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/perf...level-2-a.html

FWIW here's my results with swapping to 1.875" headers...
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/perf...s-results.html
Old 07-11-2013, 09:41 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PRE-Z06
Same results here...
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/perf...level-2-a.html

FWIW here's my results with swapping to 1.875" headers...
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/perf...s-results.html
The whole header argument makes me laugh. Every month people switch their opinion on which is better.



Quick Reply: Disappointing VR Ported FAST92 Results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.