Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

T-ReX = 383 RWHP, 361 RWTQ -- What's Wrong?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2004, 05:02 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default T-ReX = 383 RWHP, 361 RWTQ -- What's Wrong?

Hey Guys,

I really need some help on this one. I had my car dynoed today and only made 383 RWHP and 361 RWTQ with the T-ReX. I was hoping for (and expecting) at least 20 RWHP more.

My mods are listed in my sig. As you can see on the attached sheet, the AF ratio was darn near perfect and I was getting no KR with 30* of timing. The cam is lined up perfectly (obviously) and I've never had the heads off of the car, so it shouldn't be a rocker-related issue (unless the owner before me messed with them, but I doubt that's the case).

I installed a March UD pulley just before heading to the dyno, but I see no reason to believe that is to blame for the low numbers as the belt lines up just fine. I didn't have the AC belt on the car, but I doubt that would have any effect on the power.

My first two thoughts are that my clutch is slipping horribly and/or my Y-Pipe is crimped (I have dragged it on speedbumps several times, but there appears to be no damage looking underneath the car).

My friend dynoed before me and made 398 RWHP and 415 RWTQ with Patriot Stage III LS6 heads, a 230/236 cam, and all the bolt-ons through an A4 with 3.73s and a Yank SS4000.

Anyone have any ideas? I dynoed the car on a different dyno when it had only a lid, LM, and Hooker LTs and it made 320 RWHP and 330 RWTQ.

On the computer screen at the dyno, the graph was virtually flat at 6500, so I highly doubt I would've seen more than 400 RWHP at 7000. Ignore the first run, it's virtually pointless as I stopped at 5500 RPM at the request of the operator.

Thanks in advance,
Josh
Attached Thumbnails T-ReX = 383 RWHP, 361 RWTQ -- What's Wrong?-dynomay7.jpg  
Old 05-07-2004, 05:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
McRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Corona CA
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For one, you didn't rev it high enough on the dyno. It was still climbing.
Old 05-07-2004, 05:07 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
kumar75150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its still down on power but i would have revved that thing to 7k
Old 05-07-2004, 05:13 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It picked up maybe 10 RWHP from 5500 to 6000 RPM, so even if I had taken it to 7000, I doubt I would've seen 400 RWHP.

Josh
Old 05-07-2004, 05:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
AK's WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry but what are the specs on that cam again?? Is it possible that it is a little big for stock heads??
Old 05-07-2004, 05:26 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Keep your foot in it longer.
Old 05-07-2004, 05:29 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
WildBills Toyota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sugarland, TX
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ya, need some more rpm bro. That cam is made to go high like 6900-7000k
Old 05-07-2004, 05:29 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
jruss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

as shown here bigger isnt always better
Old 05-07-2004, 05:32 PM
  #9  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

A4??? get a little less from an auto....
stick probably would have been 400...which I think I have been seeing as the average.... but with heads you should see 420+ easy if you spin to 7k where the t-rex really makes power...its really not a stock internals cam...you gotta spin that boy high...

and I think really 440+ is attainable with good heads..
that cam is too big for stock heads...the stock heads will not support enough air to get real power out of it...
Old 05-07-2004, 05:50 PM
  #10  
FormerVendor
 
Pacific Muscle Cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Take the car to the track and see how it performs. I wouldn't get too caught up on peak #'s. Your torque curve is very strong, and very flat - which is shocking for a cam of that size. Your power doesn't appear nearly as "peaky" as other T-Rex dynos I've seen.

Do you have the dyno sheet for the other session you mentioned (lid, exhaust, LT's)? I am interested in seeing the curve, because those peak #'s also seem low. My '02 Z28 with the same mods (Hooker LT's, ORP, catback, lid) put down 350rwhp/360rwtq with a very flat torque curve.
Old 05-07-2004, 06:46 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the responses, guys.

As far as revving it higher, yeah, I probably would've picked up 5-10 more RWHP, but that's still way lower than I was expecting. Take a look at SMOKIN01TA's graph: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...=166035&page=1. The power really stops climbing at 6500 and holds steady. Jason's car peaked around 6500 RPM as well (http://www.thunderracing.com/dynogra...n=read&pgid=60). DanZ28's car didn't do much after 6500 RPM either (https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/167792-trex-dyno-numbers.html).

I really don't think the cam is the problem, the T-ReX has proven it can make big numbers on stock heads. My mods are very similar to HO99SS's, and he made 439/375 through 4.10s (https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162142).

soundengineer: The car is an M6.

I've attached the graph of my car with just a lid, Loudmouth and LTs.

Thanks Again,
Josh
Attached Thumbnails T-ReX = 383 RWHP, 361 RWTQ -- What's Wrong?-dyno_october03.jpg  
Old 05-07-2004, 06:57 PM
  #12  
Launching!
 
GPowrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Looking at that dyno graph I almost wonder if some how they mixed up the cam. It looks like you are making peak torque at 3300 rpm, which I would think is very low in the powerband for that cam. A lot smaller cam could make peak torque that low and would explain the low hp number.
Old 05-07-2004, 06:57 PM
  #13  
Motorboater
iTrader: (53)
 
SilverGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i say compare what you gained man.

if all you did was the cam and a pulley and you gained 63 rear wheel and have a good looking graph you should be happy. that's what its really about, what you gained before and after not comparing to other cars with similar mods. every car is different.

but take it to the track and see what the MPH is, then you'll know
Old 05-07-2004, 07:07 PM
  #14  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,697
Received 1,143 Likes on 743 Posts

Default

How was the cam degreed, describe it to us.
Old 05-07-2004, 07:14 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
How was the cam degreed, describe it to us.
Dot-to-dot using the stock chain and gears.

Originally Posted by GPowrie
Looking at that dyno graph I almost wonder if some how they mixed up the cam. It looks like you are making peak torque at 3300 rpm, which I would think is very low in the powerband for that cam. A lot smaller cam could make peak torque that low and would explain the low hp number.
LOL, one might think by looking at the graph, but I have the cam card with the appropriate specs. I agree, though, the torque curve is almost too flat for this cam.

Josh
Old 05-07-2004, 07:54 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
 
Mike K.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you take off your cats that could be another 10 hp maybe. Try some cutouts as well. Also did those other guys use a shortbelt? Do you have a ported TB? All of the little stuff adds up especially on the dyno. Also you said you have thunder pushrods are you sure your preload is right? There is more power left in that bad boy, you'll find it.
Old 05-07-2004, 08:03 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike K.
If you take off your cats that could be another 10 hp maybe. Try some cutouts as well. Also did those other guys use a shortbelt? Do you have a ported TB? All of the little stuff adds up especially on the dyno. Also you said you have thunder pushrods are you sure your preload is right? There is more power left in that bad boy, you'll find it.
No, no one ran with a short belt. If I were to gain 10 from removing the cats and another 10 from a ported TB, I'd still only be at 400 RWHP. Not bad for a cam only car, but with this particular cam, I would hope to be easily over 400.

No one thinks it could be a slipping clutch?

Josh
Old 05-07-2004, 08:10 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
 
jerflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

what lifters and springs did you use with theis cam?
Old 05-07-2004, 08:12 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Brian2001SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: western NC
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Josh, it could be the Dyno. Come down to Atlanta and run it at Dyno Lab and compare results. You could be supprised at the difference.
Old 05-07-2004, 08:15 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
ta12sec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: miami beach fl
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

go drve it put it in 3rd at about 30 and put it on the wood, does the tach jump up and the car not move? How many miles are on it, did you have the car tuned? what kid of gas were you running. how olds your fuel filter, plugs, wires air filter got a plastic bag in it?


Quick Reply: T-ReX = 383 RWHP, 361 RWTQ -- What's Wrong?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.