Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Correct Dyno Graph for G5X3!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2004, 03:06 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Correct Dyno Graph for G5X3!

Here's the right one, what do you think?? I ordered new 28.8lb injectors today, $60 couldn't beat that. My stock '99's are at the max, so I want some cushion. Thanks for all the positive feedback so far! It still has more in it, we just stopped after the 3rd pull, too many other cars in line

Old 06-07-2004, 03:11 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hate to break it to you bro, but that dyno graph is using STD correction factors which no one here uses. You need to have that converted to SAE correction so that you can compare to everyone else's numbers.

STD shows about 3-4% higher dyno #'s than SAE, so in reality your car is probably making about 391rwhp/363rwtq going by the correction factor we all use.


...and btw, 3rd pull is usually the best one so I doubt the 4th would have been much better IMO....unless you were making changes after every pull.
Old 06-07-2004, 03:13 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was messing around with the software and checked that SAE, since I had no idea what Intense was using, and noticed that STD. The numbers were 402 and 369. What do people use for smoothing, it's at 5, if I change that the numbers get bigger/larger, so I left it all alone when I posted numbers. So not that much different. And we did make changes after every pull, so I know it would have changed.
Old 06-07-2004, 03:15 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Orange Peel
I was messing around with the software and checked that SAE, since I had no idea what Intense was using, and noticed that STD. The numbers were 402 and 369. So not that much different. And we did make changes after every pull, so I know it would have changed.
Hm, that's wierd that you only show about a 1.5% difference between STD and SAE...mine all jump about 4% between the two.....still great #'s nonetheless
Old 06-07-2004, 03:17 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks, yeah I thought that too, that's why I didn't know what to use, just left it at what they were diong at Intense It's A LOT better than the old cam
Old 06-07-2004, 03:21 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
WhiteDiamond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Scott,

Very nice numbers! Are you running worked heads with this or stock heads?

Take care,
Todd
Old 06-07-2004, 03:22 PM
  #7  
Launching!
 
Crowley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: McKinney Texas
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Orange Peel
Here's the right one, what do you think?? I ordered new 28.8lb injectors today, $60 couldn't beat that. My stock '99's are at the max, so I want some cushion. Thanks for all the positive feedback so far! It still has more in it, we just stopped after the 3rd pull, too many other cars in line
You have the absolute speed heads right? .. did you check the preload on your compRs?


Sorry about that .. just read the origional post .. stock heads right?
thanks,
Crowley
Old 06-07-2004, 03:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yep stock '99 LS1 heads
Old 06-07-2004, 05:27 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
JDPZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Scott, what are your mods?
Old 06-07-2004, 05:30 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's my sig full of my mods from LS1.com, sorry for the layout, don't want to retype them

'99 SS #2049, Hugger Orange, M6, LG G5X3 114 Cam, Comp 921 dual springs, Titanium retainers, TR Pushrods, LS6 Intake, Borla, Pacesetter Long Tube Headers, 3" y-pipe w/ no cats & cutout, ASP Crank Pulley, FRA, McLeod Street Twin, B&M Ripper, Moser 12 bolt, 4.11's, LS1edit, KBDDSFC's, 1LE 21mm rear sway bar, GW Adj. Panhard Rod, Eibach Pro-Kit Springs, BMR STB, BMR LCA relocation brackets, Whisper Lid, Braided SS brake lines, K&N, Power Antenna, 18x9.5 & 18x10.5 Chrome Z06 wheels, !CAGS, !EGR, !AIR, 178' thermo., all SLP options.
Old 06-07-2004, 05:53 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
JDPZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks. not bad #'s considering your running through a 12 bolt and pushing those heavy 18's!
Old 06-07-2004, 06:34 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
Orange Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks dude, I am pretty happy with them Need more now
Old 06-08-2004, 07:06 AM
  #13  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

nice numbers.

Last edited by jrp; 06-08-2004 at 07:17 AM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.