Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

"The Mongoose" - 1 3/4" Headers To 1 7/8" Headers (447 rwhp and 431 rwtq)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2016, 07:11 AM
  #201  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I understand if you want to stay with the MAF, but if your tuner is good, you can't tell a difference. I've had my car tuned with both the MAF and SD, and I seriously cannot tell the difference.
Old 06-01-2016, 02:08 PM
  #202  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,796
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

^Agree...my car runs solid with no maf.
Old 11-02-2016, 12:15 PM
  #203  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Update: I've pretty much left the car be because I wanted to enjoy it while the weather has been nice. Now that winter is coming, I've decided to replace the cam. I reached out to Advanced Induction, and they suggested a 234/240 113 LSA cam. I also reached out to Cam Motion and they suggested a 232/238 111.5 LSA cam. I'm going with Cam Motion because I get half off because they used a bunch of the names I suggested for "shelf cams". I also reached out to Martin through PM and a FB message, but I never got anything back. Below is what Cam Motion had to say about the current cam and the reason the cam fell off so hard at 5,800 RPM's: I'm looking forward to seeing how much better the new cam performs. I will also be adding a FAST intake/TB, but I want to start with the cam change to see how much more I get out of it with a cam that's properly spec'd to the heads/setup.


In looking at your current camshaft, it is pretty obvious why the power does not carry well in the upper RPM. Your current camshaft closes the intake valve at 38.5 degrees after bottom dead center. This is really early for a performance camshaft in an LS1 like yours and is about the same as a stock cam LS1 camshaft.

If you would like similar driving characteristics and better RPM capability, I would recommend a 232/238 111.5+3.5 with .621"/.595" lift. This camshaft will also work good on a cylinder head with a strong exhaust port. This camshaft will have slightly better intake piston to valve and slightly less exhaust valve clearance than what you have now. Plenty safe.
Old 11-02-2016, 12:23 PM
  #204  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
soloman369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: League city, Tx
Posts: 544
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Did you ever take it to the track ?
Old 11-02-2016, 12:25 PM
  #205  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soloman369
Did you ever take it to the track ?
No, only pulls/runs on the street.
Old 11-02-2016, 12:43 PM
  #206  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,746 Likes on 1,304 Posts

Default

Interesting read on the new cam choice. BE sure to post up new numbers.
Old 11-02-2016, 12:46 PM
  #207  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Interesting read on the new cam choice. BE sure to post up new numbers.
I was surprised that Advanced Induction and Cam Motion were pretty much on the same page regarding the proper cam for the application. The at .50 specs were pretty similar.

Yes, new numbers will be posted. Pulls will be made on the same dyno too, so it will be a real comparison.
Old 11-04-2016, 10:28 AM
  #208  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

New cam is on the way, and decided to get it ground on the 8620 core. As soon as it gets here, car will go under the knife and I'll have new numbers. This cam should have no problem carrying power to 7,000 rpm's.
Old 11-04-2016, 04:56 PM
  #209  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,796
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Edit* I see it was a tick cam.

I like cam motions specs...good choice.

Last edited by kinglt-1; 11-04-2016 at 07:41 PM.
Old 11-05-2016, 10:32 AM
  #210  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
In looking at your current camshaft, it is pretty obvious why the power does not carry well in the upper RPM. Your current camshaft closes the intake valve at 38.5 degrees after bottom dead center. This is really early for a performance camshaft in an LS1 like yours and is about the same as a stock cam LS1 camshaft.
I agree, I'm usually not one to say "I told you so", but that's what I was saying since page 1. If the intake valve is closing too soon, you will not be able to take advatntage of the "inertia supercharging" effect at higher RPM/airspeeds. If you were to retard the cam a few degrees and it picks up power, that would confirm it.
Old 11-05-2016, 06:17 PM
  #211  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
I agree, I'm usually not one to say "I told you so", but that's what I was saying since page 1. If the intake valve is closing too soon, you will not be able to take advatntage of the "inertia supercharging" effect at higher RPM/airspeeds. If you were to retard the cam a few degrees and it picks up power, that would confirm it.
Yeah, you were right. Cam Motion feels the exact same way. KCS, what do you think of the new cam specs? I'm curious how much It's going to pick up at 5,800 to 7,000?
Old 11-05-2016, 06:19 PM
  #212  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
Edit* I see it was a tick cam.

I like cam motions specs...good choice.
Cam in the car now is a Tick cam. I had AI and Cam Motion spec cams out and ended up going with Cam Motion.
Old 11-05-2016, 09:53 PM
  #213  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
Yeah, you were right. Cam Motion feels the exact same way. KCS, what do you think of the new cam specs? I'm curious how much It's going to pick up at 5,800 to 7,000?
I like the new specs; they might be a little bigger than what I would like in a 5.7L street car. but it should run like hell. I wouldn't be surprised if you picked up 40-60whp.
Old 11-06-2016, 12:54 AM
  #214  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Interesting. I haven't visited the dyno section in quite a while. Nice read.

That cam and heads combo was never great. Adding the 1-7/8" just made it worse. You need a later IVC... and I'll say this the I/E ratio doesn't really matter.

I went from a 234/242 111+3 to a 227/244 115+5. My IVC dropped and my exhaust events are even later. And I have pretty much the same exhaust as you.

I didn't lose a damn thing. I picked up everywhere. Even up top. I don't have back-to-back dynos to prove it. Just a VE table that required 20% more fuel down low and 5-7% up top. And a car that gets sideways even easier.

Why? Who knows. Tooley said I'd be faster with this cam with the TEA heads. It's now good for the D1 I'm adding too...
Old 11-06-2016, 09:46 AM
  #215  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
I like the new specs; they might be a little bigger than what I would like in a 5.7L street car. but it should run like hell. I wouldn't be surprised if you picked up 40-60whp.
I'd be very happy with those gains. After the cam change, we'll get the car on the dyno and touch up the tune and get some new numbers. Over the winter I will also add a FAST intake. I'm hoping Vengeance Racing offers their Black Friday sale where they offer the porting of their FAST intakes for free. I know they've done this in years past.
Old 11-08-2016, 02:08 PM
  #216  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ds98formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joliet Illinois
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

interesting read will be waiting for results
Old 11-08-2016, 07:49 PM
  #217  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
whatsa347's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: clear lake, Texas
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'm excited to see what those heads make for power, you're the only one I know that runs them.
Old 11-09-2016, 07:53 AM
  #218  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by whatsa347
I'm excited to see what those heads make for power, you're the only one I know that runs them.
Yeah, as far as I know, I'm it on this site that runs them. With this new cam, we will see their full potential.
Old 11-12-2016, 11:25 AM
  #219  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

New cam arrived. The valve events are quite different than the current cam.
Attached Thumbnails "The Mongoose" - 1 3/4" Headers To 1 7/8" Headers (447 rwhp and 431 rwtq)-forumrunner_20161112_112318.png  

Last edited by Rise of the Phoenix; 11-14-2016 at 07:54 AM.
Old 11-17-2016, 07:52 AM
  #220  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The car was dyno'd last night with the current cam/setup. It put down 431 rwhp and 421 rwtq with the cooler weather. The old cam is coming out and the new one is going in. I'll have dyno numbers Friday evening with the new cam. I'll make sure to get the graph posted.


Quick Reply: "The Mongoose" - 1 3/4" Headers To 1 7/8" Headers (447 rwhp and 431 rwtq)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.