F13 cam-only dyno sheet
06-28-2004, 09:34 PM
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F13 cam-only dyno sheet Finally got it scanned. I've been talking to Allan and others and we're thinking that with a TB, pulley, a better exhaust setup (my current Y is pretty restrictive), and a dyno that isn't known for low readouts, I should be where I want to be.
All the pulls were right in this region. It made 377/363 as a best, I believe, but that was leaned out a tiny bit more. This is the "safe" result:
All the pulls were right in this region. It made 377/363 as a best, I believe, but that was leaned out a tiny bit more. This is the "safe" result:
06-28-2004, 09:40 PM
#2
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A pulley and ported TB would be worth an easy 10hp over the stock pieces. Depending on how restrictive your current y-pipe is, there should be a few hp left there as well.
The #s are actually pretty decent for your mods! You are definitely heading the right direction.
Jason
The #s are actually pretty decent for your mods! You are definitely heading the right direction.
Jason
06-28-2004, 09:42 PM
#3
Nice looking graph. I went from 389 rwhp 382 rwtq with a 10bolt stock t/b , stock pulley and shortbelt to 400/388 with a 12 bolt and same gears as 10 bolt(4.10's) but had a ported throttle body and asp pulley but no short belt.
SO even with the 12 bolt it still put out more from the tb and pulley then before the 12 bolt.
SO even with the 12 bolt it still put out more from the tb and pulley then before the 12 bolt.
Trending Topics
06-29-2004, 10:12 AM
#8
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mods are: Futral F13 (230/232 .595/.585 112+2 - gomer's old cam that made 470/420 with heads), LS6 intake, Grot LT's, MTI lid, dumped Dynomax race bullet, free mods. Stock rear and gears.
Untuned, pre-cam/LS6 intake #'s were 333/342.
Untuned, pre-cam/LS6 intake #'s were 333/342.
06-29-2004, 11:34 PM
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Most the cars ive read about with FMS cams seem to be closer to the 400 range or more. Not ragging or anything, just seems weird to me thats all, that is also the cam i am planning on purchasing. am i missing something here 
06-30-2004, 06:37 AM
#10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kbronSS
Most the cars ive read about with FMS cams seem to be closer to the 400 range or more. Not ragging or anything, just seems weird to me thats all, that is also the cam i am planning on purchasing. am i missing something here
06-30-2004, 11:12 AM
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Originally Posted by gomer
You are missing that he doesn't have a ported TB, ASP pulley, and has a shitty Y-pipe.. he's leaving 20 to 30rwhp on the table, add that to his numbers he's making now and he'd be damn close to, if not over, 400rwhp.
So how much rwhp would u have if u replaced your heads with the stocks ones? Very nice numbers and set up by the way! Thats what i want to see.
07-08-2004, 08:29 AM
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gomer
You are missing that he doesn't have a ported TB, ASP pulley, and has a shitty Y-pipe.. he's leaving 20 to 30rwhp on the table, add that to his numbers he's making now and he'd be damn close to, if not over, 400rwhp.
hehehe... told you so!! Now get that super shitty Y-pipe taken care of and you'll get close to that 400 mark.
)
