Brand new 383, thoughts on my numbers please
#21
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As I look at your combo, I see your heads and cam holding back your low RPM HP and TQ.
Stock displacement LS3's have pushed more power through the entire curve with less cam.
Also....hard to say not knowing your header specs, but if it's not what you have, 1 7/8" primaries would be the way to go.
Just my quick thoughts....for what they may (or may not) be worth.
KW
Stock displacement LS3's have pushed more power through the entire curve with less cam.
Also....hard to say not knowing your header specs, but if it's not what you have, 1 7/8" primaries would be the way to go.
Just my quick thoughts....for what they may (or may not) be worth.
KW
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (06-13-2020)
#22
On The Tree
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As I look at your combo, I see your heads and cam holding back your low RPM HP and TQ.
Stock displacement LS3's have pushed more power through the entire curve with less cam.
Also....hard to say not knowing your header specs, but if it's not what you have, 1 7/8" primaries would be the way to go.
Just my quick thoughts....for what they may (or may not) be worth.
KW
Stock displacement LS3's have pushed more power through the entire curve with less cam.
Also....hard to say not knowing your header specs, but if it's not what you have, 1 7/8" primaries would be the way to go.
Just my quick thoughts....for what they may (or may not) be worth.
KW
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The cam in my opinion is not holding the combo back.
@cdubbzz 395ci build comes to mind and that motor performed well with a small 231/239 camshaft.
@cdubbzz 395ci build comes to mind and that motor performed well with a small 231/239 camshaft.