Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

5.3 with Summit 8718 Stg1 cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2022, 05:36 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
eff10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Montana
Posts: 39
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Default 5.3 with Summit 8718 Stg1 cam

Decided to do an AFM delete on a 2008 Chev 1500 4WD pickup. This is a non-VVT engine. I got the smallest towing stage 1 summit cam to keep maximum drivability and mileage.
Stage 1 SUM-8718R1 Pro LS Drop-in Truck Swap Cam, Maximum Torque for Towing and Efficiency, 205/217 112+2, .500 /.500
I did change the lifter springs to the Summit LS6 and bought the Summit AFM delete kit that comes with lifters, gaskets and valley cover.
I had it dynoed stock at 231.5 rwhp. Did the cam swap and two days later dyno tested again at the same shop. They used HPTuners for the AFM delete and some minor tuning tweaks.
New RWHP 265! That's 33 hp more with a tiny cam. Peak power remained at 5300 rpm and the Summit cam carried that horsepower all the way to our 6K cutoff. HP looked dead flat from 5200-6000 rpm.




The following 9 users liked this post by eff10mm:
68Formula (03-14-2022), 99 Black Bird T/A (03-14-2022), DualQuadDave (01-04-2024), G Atsma (03-14-2022), Jake Wade (01-27-2024), jmilz28 (10-17-2023), kinglt-1 (12-02-2023), Ls7colorado (09-07-2022), Summitracing (03-15-2022) and 4 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 03-14-2022, 06:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

Sounds like a nice gain for the small cam!
Old 03-14-2022, 07:04 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 686
Received 358 Likes on 245 Posts

Default

Congrats, nice gains for a small camshaft. Did they give you the graphs? It'd be nice to see the curve differences if they're available.
Old 03-15-2022, 09:15 AM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
eff10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Montana
Posts: 39
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Default


Sorry that it's just a crappy cell photo, but look at that sweet torque improvement.
The following 2 users liked this post by eff10mm:
Ls7colorado (06-02-2022), Summitracing (03-15-2022)
Old 03-15-2022, 10:57 AM
  #5  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,464
Received 3,512 Likes on 2,164 Posts

Default

Yes! Forget about the 33hp number…look at the under the curve improvement. I bet it feels like 100 more hp and torque around town. Good for you man!
The following 4 users liked this post by Che70velle:
68Formula (03-15-2022), G Atsma (10-20-2023), Jimbo1367 (10-17-2023), jmilz28 (05-15-2022)
Old 03-15-2022, 11:37 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,136
Received 3,113 Likes on 2,428 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
Yes! Forget about the 33hp number…look at the under the curve improvement. I bet it feels like 100 more hp and torque around town. Good for you man!
I agree! Great numbers for what some call a "baby cam", or less.
There are more and more of these hitting the market in the last few years, one reason being they are practically invisible to smog checkers. They sniff clean and don't lope to any real degree.
The following users liked this post:
Jimbo1367 (10-17-2023)
Old 03-15-2022, 02:47 PM
  #7  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,005
Received 1,190 Likes on 648 Posts

Default

Awesome! Thank you for your patronage and for sharing your results with the community! We bet with that improvement under the curve the SUM-8718R1 has put a smile on your face
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following 2 users liked this post by Summitracing:
DualQuadDave (01-04-2024), G Atsma (03-15-2022)
Old 03-17-2022, 08:25 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
eff10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Montana
Posts: 39
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I got the Dynojet file from the tuner.
Attached Files
The following 3 users liked this post by eff10mm:
68Formula (03-17-2022), Ls7colorado (06-02-2022), Summitracing (03-22-2022)
Old 05-15-2022, 02:30 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
customblackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,978
Received 82 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

I have the summit 8719 high lift in a 5.3 going in a 78 vette. I hope I get a bit more from it than this but those numbers will make this street car much more fun to drive. Nice job! You never see dyno graphs of the tiny cams
The following 3 users liked this post by customblackbird:
DualQuadDave (01-04-2024), G Atsma (05-15-2022), Ls7colorado (06-02-2022)
Old 05-16-2022, 12:53 PM
  #10  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,005
Received 1,190 Likes on 648 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by customblackbird
I have the summit 8719 high lift in a 5.3 going in a 78 vette. I hope I get a bit more from it than this but those numbers will make this street car much more fun to drive. Nice job! You never see dyno graphs of the tiny cams
You will The SUM-8719R1 has a tick more intake duration so you'll gain a bit there. More importantly, the .050" added lift will improve power and torque across the range! It should be a fun easy to get along with combo that will put a smile on your face!
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (05-16-2022)
Old 06-02-2022, 06:49 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
 
gagliano7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Monroe,NY
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

The torque curve is very nice.
Old 06-02-2022, 11:11 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ls7colorado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Henderson, TN
Posts: 1,856
Received 449 Likes on 344 Posts

Default

NIce, thanks for sharing this! Dont get to to see results of small cams.... ever... this is a perfect replacement cam it looks like for someone just wanting a little more than stock without getting into heavy tuning while retaining factory reliability.
Old 09-07-2022, 01:23 PM
  #13  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,005
Received 1,190 Likes on 648 Posts

Default

Looking at the results after these couple months. If you are now "in need of a little more", bumping that rev limiter to 6500 would add a lot to the average horsepower curve. The springs and cam will be happy there.
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following 2 users liked this post by Summitracing:
G Atsma (09-07-2022), Ls7colorado (09-07-2022)
Old 10-17-2023, 09:42 AM
  #14  
Teching In
 
gripex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

33hp gain for cam and tune isnt great.... was this tuned on 87? should gain the 33 from just the cam, and another 20'ish for the tune...
Old 10-20-2023, 04:23 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
jmilz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,692
Received 112 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gripex
33hp gain for cam and tune isnt great.... was this tuned on 87? should gain the 33 from just the cam, and another 20'ish for the tune...
You are making some assumptions there that you can't know for sure. He may have already had a CAI. He may have already had a tune or had a better tuned factory car. What is known is that increased area under the curve is significant for zero compromise in driveability or MPG, plus deleting the AFM/DoD will actually improve longevity. This is a real-world win with no compromises.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (10-20-2023)
Old 10-20-2023, 05:45 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 904
Received 135 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jmilz28
You are making some assumptions there that you can't know for sure. He may have already had a CAI. He may have already had a tune or had a better tuned factory car. What is known is that increased area under the curve is significant for zero compromise in driveability or MPG, plus deleting the AFM/DoD will actually improve longevity. This is a real-world win with no compromises.
Agreed, not sure why he thinks a tune is automatically 20 hp. I have tuned some that lost peak power on a safe tune. Lean is mean right up until the thing goes boom.
The following 5 users liked this post by Fast355:
68Formula (10-20-2023), blackdak318 (01-14-2024), G Atsma (10-20-2023), Jimbo1367 (10-21-2023), jmilz28 (10-21-2023)
Old 12-01-2023, 11:39 AM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
eff10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Montana
Posts: 39
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

This is run on 87 octane. It's a 5.3 truck engine, so I really don't believe in big gains from just a tune. This is the baby little cam, so I wouldn't expect big top end gains either. This was purely done on a budget with the main goal of reliability. This is truly a work truck. It's a parts runner for a business. I hand the keys to employees daily to run around town in and sometimes road trips to attend training seminars.
Old 12-01-2023, 12:19 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,136
Received 3,113 Likes on 2,428 Posts
Default

I wish the term "baby cam" would go away.
It's like something you use until you "grow" into a "grown-up" cam to keep the dick measuring contest alive.
We don't all need chop or lope. That's an intermittent miss that most don't miss.
We're not in high school anymore....
The following 2 users liked this post by G Atsma:
grubinski (12-10-2023), strutaeng (12-01-2023)
Old 12-01-2023, 04:48 PM
  #19  
Launching!
 
strutaeng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 280
Received 70 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
I wish the term "baby cam" would go away.
It's like something you use until you "grow" into a "grown-up" cam to keep the dick measuring contest alive.
We don't all need chop or lope. That's an intermittent miss that most don't miss.
We're not in high school anymore....
"Baby cam"? LoL

I've never really paid attention to folks call them that. Ya, that's childish in opinion as well.

If that's a baby cam, then the factory cams must be toddler cams with training wheels.

If anything, often it's the kids the ones that "need" the chop/lope. I'm generalizing, of course.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (12-01-2023)
Old 12-01-2023, 05:12 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 686
Received 358 Likes on 245 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by strutaeng
"Baby cam"? LoL
If that's a baby cam, then the factory cams must be toddler cams with training wheels.
Embryo cams.
The following 2 users liked this post by 68Formula:
G Atsma (12-01-2023), strutaeng (12-01-2023)


Quick Reply: 5.3 with Summit 8718 Stg1 cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.