1998 Bolt On Results step by step
10-23-2004, 09:33 AM
#41
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hell, I have a 98 with auto, I dont understand what the big deal is. The numbers seem right to me, plus not all cars dyno the same anyway. My 98 makes a little more power than posted 4 all you bs callers 
10-23-2004, 09:58 AM
#42
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
chrdij
do you realize the main thing here was that it was a mustang dyno? i have a feeling you didn't read the thread and your numbers were not on a mustang dyno.
do you realize the main thing here was that it was a mustang dyno? i have a feeling you didn't read the thread and your numbers were not on a mustang dyno.
10-23-2004, 06:37 PM
#43
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
chrdij
do you realize the main thing here was that it was a mustang dyno? i have a feeling you didn't read the thread and your numbers were not on a mustang dyno.
do you realize the main thing here was that it was a mustang dyno? i have a feeling you didn't read the thread and your numbers were not on a mustang dyno.
10-23-2004, 06:46 PM
#44
Originally Posted by chrdij
No **** sherlock, the numbers are not that far fetched to be unreasonable. And yes we are talking about a MUSTANG DYNO. Dont be mad if his 98 put down more than your 99. It's ok...this kind of thing happens once in a while.
Calm it down you to. The stock numbers are probably I little high. Hell, one of my runs said 345 RWHP stock, sometimes the dyno does read it wrong which is why you do it more than once.
98-99 are the same btw.
-Todd
10-23-2004, 06:52 PM
#45
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No **** sherlock, the numbers are not that far fetched to be unreasonable. And yes we are talking about a MUSTANG DYNO. Dont be mad if his 98 put down more than your 99. It's ok...this kind of thing happens once in a while.
10-23-2004, 09:10 PM
#46
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
Yes it does matter otherwise numbers have no meaning at all. In fact, I notice you have them in your sig...why?? Because if "it does not matter one freaking bit" if they are even accurate or not, than whats the point on even listing them??
Track times will prove it, thats what matters anyway.
10-25-2004, 12:35 PM
#48
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the record I'd like to say thanks to Katfishracing for posting those results.
Sorry about the BS calling, but the initial stock numbers just seemd to be too high from what I thought I knew about mustang dyno's. Apparently there was more to the story.
Anyhow, the most important part of the post was the gains anyhow, and that was very helpful and interesting, especially to me since I am about to add an LS6 intake and Pacesetter LT's w/orp. So thanks for taking the time to post the step by step results!
PS-chrd, no problem man, lol.
Sorry about the BS calling, but the initial stock numbers just seemd to be too high from what I thought I knew about mustang dyno's. Apparently there was more to the story.
Anyhow, the most important part of the post was the gains anyhow, and that was very helpful and interesting, especially to me since I am about to add an LS6 intake and Pacesetter LT's w/orp. So thanks for taking the time to post the step by step results!
PS-chrd, no problem man, lol.
10-26-2004, 09:04 PM
#49
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pevely, MO
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i know mike and lambeth personally, i have known them for probably six months and was at the track the night that it ran 10.98 and i have seen this car and its mods. if they say it made those numbers on a mustang dyno then i believe them, neither one of them have any reason to lie about the numbers. my 98 with no tune and just lid, pulley and catback, made 322 and 332 with 108000 miles on it. mike's car is simply amazing to watch.
jmac-
jmac-
i dunno if thats lagit unless ur other one was very dirty. those are very impressive numbers tho
10-26-2004, 09:18 PM
#51
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to throw out here that it all depends on the dyno and you really can't make a comparison unless it's your car back o back. I did 385 on the mustnag dyno. Then did nothing to the car all week and ran on the dyno jet the following week and got 389. Had to take the ac belt off to get to 393. It just depends. No matter what it's a baseline and as long as you make your comparisons on the same dyno that's great. I noticed the improvements looked about right for each mod. Great car. Bet it's a blast to drive now. Thanks for posting up. It's always great to see some reality for all those manufacturers claims.
10-26-2004, 09:30 PM
#52
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Palos Hills, IL
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KatfishRacing
We are currently working on a 1998 A4 Z28. The owner wanted to track the results from each modification. I thought this information might help other people to estimate the gains from the mods. All of this was done on a Mustang dyno and the numbers are corrected for weather. Our altitude it 513 feet.
Modification................ Horsepower...........Torque..........avg AFR
Stock...........................299.8............. ......297.0...........12.2
K&N Filter......................304.3................. ..299.2...........12.1
TSP Lid.........................309.2................. ..301.4...........12.5
LS6 Intake.....................317.5.................. .307.1...........12.5
Pacesetter LT headers
& TSP orp......................335.2...................3 22.0...........12.7
Exhaust Cutout...............350.9...................336.1 ...........12.8
The car is on a stock tune with EGR and A.I.R removed. The car weighs 3560 with 1/2 tank of gas and no driver.
Modification................ Horsepower...........Torque..........avg AFR
Stock...........................299.8............. ......297.0...........12.2
K&N Filter......................304.3................. ..299.2...........12.1
TSP Lid.........................309.2................. ..301.4...........12.5
LS6 Intake.....................317.5.................. .307.1...........12.5
Pacesetter LT headers
& TSP orp......................335.2...................3 22.0...........12.7
Exhaust Cutout...............350.9...................336.1 ...........12.8
The car is on a stock tune with EGR and A.I.R removed. The car weighs 3560 with 1/2 tank of gas and no driver.
10-27-2004, 06:29 AM
#53
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jmac_98ls1
i know mike and lambeth personally, i have known them for probably six months and was at the track the night that it ran 10.98 and i have seen this car and its mods. if they say it made those numbers on a mustang dyno then i believe them, neither one of them have any reason to lie about the numbers. my 98 with no tune and just lid, pulley and catback, made 322 and 332 with 108000 miles on it. mike's car is simply amazing to watch.
jmac-
jmac-
Originally Posted by 02WS6Bird
a lil off topic but how does Stock muffler and LT's sounds?
The stock cat back with the long tubes was still very quiet, even at WOT it was not a huge difference from stock. With the cutout open... thats a different story. We put an electric cutout on it, great sleeper mod.
10-28-2004, 09:42 PM
#55
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
There was no cutout in any of the dyno tests right? You should do a dyno now with the cutout...I'd bet that would really open her up
02WS6,
The long tubes/off road Y and stock catback is very very doscile. I had the bassani put on and I almost regret it. I still have the factory catback and as soon as I make 50 posts, and am able to put a for sale add on this board, I am gonna sell the bassani and put back the stock catback.
Anyone want a highly prices bassani???
400 and its yours!!!
Will trade for a set of draglites!!!
01-03-2005, 11:03 PM
#56
Originally Posted by KatfishRacing
The last car we had on the dyno with similar mods did about the same. Everyone doubted the numbers until he went to the track and ran a 12.3.
even the owner of that car didn't think it was real
i'm another local and can tell you they don't lie about numbers or try to "play" with the numbers.... they have crushed many dreams and made some (like me) keep there car when they thought about selling it....
sucks don had to go and get rid of the thing
Last edited by ramairstyle00; 01-03-2005 at 11:12 PM.
01-27-2005, 07:11 PM
#57
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good Info
Originally Posted by Don98Z
the 350.9 was with the cutout open. The original post says that as well.
02WS6,
The long tubes/off road Y and stock catback is very very doscile. I had the bassani put on and I almost regret it. I still have the factory catback and as soon as I make 50 posts, and am able to put a for sale add on this board, I am gonna sell the bassani and put back the stock catback.
Anyone want a highly prices bassani???
400 and its yours!!!
Will trade for a set of draglites!!!
02WS6,
The long tubes/off road Y and stock catback is very very doscile. I had the bassani put on and I almost regret it. I still have the factory catback and as soon as I make 50 posts, and am able to put a for sale add on this board, I am gonna sell the bassani and put back the stock catback.
Anyone want a highly prices bassani???
400 and its yours!!!
Will trade for a set of draglites!!!
