Highest HP AFR 205 car to date...
11-17-2004, 07:57 AM
#22
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: REDFORD,MI
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lets see, 535hp 10.49 @140...on a 346...and lou thinks it can go 9's....on a 205cc runner..and people are still 
without a doubt, we have the official
rodney dangerfield part of the LSX world..
without a doubt, we have the official rodney dangerfield part of the LSX world..
11-17-2004, 09:15 AM
#23
7 Second Club
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: paducah, ky
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those kind of numbers from a 346 is what makes me go to work in the morning so i can buy my soon to be afr 225s! over 500 horsies from a 346 N/A makes me 
stuff
stuff 
11-17-2004, 02:28 PM
#25
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just pointing out that it wasn't just the heads making all the power like I gathered for the subject line and so people dont start screeming "So and so made HP with these but I didn't!" Hell I was about to put my AS stage 2.5's in the trash untill I saw the 12 to 1 and a few other things.
Last edited by YsoFast; 11-17-2004 at 02:34 PM.
11-17-2004, 03:30 PM
#26
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd bet the car would ET much better with a stronger rear but the trap speed would drop a bit. Seems like cars always trap higher when they spin and trap lower when they et better.
JMO.
140mph is impressive none the less. There are cars with strokers and nitrous that don't trap that.
JMO.
140mph is impressive none the less. There are cars with strokers and nitrous that don't trap that.
11-17-2004, 03:58 PM
#28
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Louis,
quick question
How much did you mill the heads for 12:1 comp and did you go with 4cc valve reliefs on the pistons?
I think that combo is amazing. I would what it would do in my 385
quick question
How much did you mill the heads for 12:1 comp and did you go with 4cc valve reliefs on the pistons?
I think that combo is amazing. I would what it would do in my 385
04-25-2006, 12:54 PM
#29
Originally Posted by YsoFast
I was just pointing out that it wasn't just the heads making all the power like I gathered for the subject line and so people dont start screeming "So and so made HP with these but I didn't!" Hell I was about to put my AS stage 2.5's in the trash untill I saw the 12 to 1 and a few other things.
What are the 'few other things you saw'?
Last edited by Spinmonster; 04-25-2006 at 01:02 PM.
04-25-2006, 04:50 PM
#30
Originally Posted by Spinmonster
As if the 7 hp going from 11.5: to 12:1 accounts for anything to write home about. I just don't get the reason people have an issue with static CR when the dynamic compression is what matters and the data logging never supports the 'cylinder pressure issues' theory many cite as the problem. It gets tuned and data logged and never shows knock retard up high in the rpm then accept that 12:1 on pump gas with the correct dcr is fine to run.
What are the 'few other things you saw'?
What are the 'few other things you saw'?
04-25-2006, 05:22 PM
#32
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The point of no return...
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SO is this the setup you'll be competing with now, Lou? I saw a little bit of your Long Beach race on Speed. I love seeing that car hit those straights and take those corners.
04-25-2006, 11:18 PM
#33
Originally Posted by SideStep
You resurrect a thread from a year and a half ago to bust some guys chops...
I had to read that twice to make sure I saw it right. 
04-26-2006, 02:09 PM
#38
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How the hell you get the rwtq's so hi? For a long time 400rwtq was a lot, then 410, then 420 and then 430's. But 480's out of a stock block 346. Tat has to be explained, cause it just breaks all the rules...
04-26-2006, 03:04 PM
#39
Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Holy dead thread, Batman!
Regarding the power and TQ they are actually right in line with a high flowing effficient headed combo (one with alot of airspeed). The numbers mimic my current 383 set-up which has less compression and a smaller camshaft, but make ups for that in displacement to a point. Also, Lou has an extremely optimized driveline with a light flywheel/clutch package which will allow more power to make it to the rear wheels. A standard clutch flywheel combo (say a SPEC III with an Fidenza aluminum wheel) would probably dyno 10-15 less TQ and HP.
Either way you slice it its a badass ride and stupid power from a hydraulic roller 346....that's for sure. And I almost fell over as well when this thread got resurected from the dead....LOL
Tony M.