Torquer dyno'd
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Torquer dyno'd sorry for the crappy quality, what do yall think? from what the people at Rev Xtreme here in tampa told me the dyno is pretty stingy, and we were having some crappy weather (rained all day) but otherwise it looks good, base dyno was 360ish, so i had a great improvment. final numbers where 387hp/367tq
Originally Posted by LS1_PNYTAMR
with a pulley and maybe a lil something else u could be at 395+/372+ easily... pretty decent tq curve compared to some of the 233/239's ive seen lately.. 300tq at 3000 rpms is pretty decent.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Checkmate
Seems a little weak on the torque where this cam was suppose shine, HP # looks go though.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
those are pretty similiar to my 233/239
but i have no pully, tb or intake.
edit:
we have some damn similiar mods.
pacesetter, tsp duals, lid..........no tb but take a look where we compare.
but i have no pully, tb or intake.
edit:
we have some damn similiar mods.
pacesetter, tsp duals, lid..........no tb but take a look where we compare.
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, FL
i dunno, after i get my pully i'm sure it will make similar power to that claimed by tsp.
yeah we do! Jeremy at Rev xtreme did a damn good job on my tune, i figured tsp would have been able to squeeze more power out of it, but i guess not! our graphs are very similar, we even have the same little torque dip from 4000-4500 rpms.. i wonder if thats a problem ground into the cam? anyway, keep me updated on your progress, and i'll do the same. it looks like we're headin in the same direction
edit: just to let you guys know, i topped out around 390, but i was getting a little knock on the dyno and jeremy said it would be alot worse on the street, so he toned it down a bit.
edit:
we have some damn similiar mods.
pacesetter, tsp duals, lid..........no tb but take a look where we compare
we have some damn similiar mods.
pacesetter, tsp duals, lid..........no tb but take a look where we compare
edit: just to let you guys know, i topped out around 390, but i was getting a little knock on the dyno and jeremy said it would be alot worse on the street, so he toned it down a bit.
Originally Posted by LSONE
i dunno, after i get my pully i'm sure it will make similar power to that claimed by tsp.
TECH Regular
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Golds Gym
My B1 cam 221/221 558/558 on a 114+4 Lunati/MTI grind made 386hp and 380ish torque. All bolt ons, and the stock 241 heads. I dont know what all the craze is lately with these my dick is bigger than yours cams. Sure, other grinds will get you 10-15 more hp, but at what expense? I hope it works out for you though. Peace, Vic
!LS1 11 Second Club
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 2
From: Miami
We dyno lower down here than the rest of you guys, plus the humid season is starting up.
Get that pulley and you'll be in the 390's for hp.
Without a doubt, the Futral grinds are kicking the crap out of the TSP grinds in the tq department.
Get that pulley and you'll be in the 390's for hp.
Without a doubt, the Futral grinds are kicking the crap out of the TSP grinds in the tq department.
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, FL
^ i agree, and at this point i'm kinda wishing i had gone the f14 route. you know as well as i do that jeremy is a great tuner, so we know he isnt the problem 
anyway, by base run i meant i had the cam but wasnt tuned, so a tune got me over 20 rwhp, with the cam already in. after i get a pully i'll probably be around 400 rwhp, a little less perhaps, but i wont be NEAR 400 rwtq. we'll see what happens, i'm just glad i'm tuned for now
edit: actually the futural RJ cam looks pretty good, i wonder if their gonna offer it on a wider lsa, 111 is kinda low, i would rather have the 114 f14 over the ron jeremy at this point
anyway, by base run i meant i had the cam but wasnt tuned, so a tune got me over 20 rwhp, with the cam already in. after i get a pully i'll probably be around 400 rwhp, a little less perhaps, but i wont be NEAR 400 rwtq. we'll see what happens, i'm just glad i'm tuned for now
edit: actually the futural RJ cam looks pretty good, i wonder if their gonna offer it on a wider lsa, 111 is kinda low, i would rather have the 114 f14 over the ron jeremy at this point
Originally Posted by LSONE
i dunno, after i get my pully i'm sure it will make similar power to that claimed by tsp.
yeah we do! Jeremy at Rev xtreme did a damn good job on my tune, i figured tsp would have been able to squeeze more power out of it, but i guess not! our graphs are very similar, we even have the same little torque dip from 4000-4500 rpms.. i wonder if thats a problem ground into the cam? anyway, keep me updated on your progress, and i'll do the same. it looks like we're headin in the same direction
edit: just to let you guys know, i topped out around 390, but i was getting a little knock on the dyno and jeremy said it would be alot worse on the street, so he toned it down a bit.
yeah we do! Jeremy at Rev xtreme did a damn good job on my tune, i figured tsp would have been able to squeeze more power out of it, but i guess not! our graphs are very similar, we even have the same little torque dip from 4000-4500 rpms.. i wonder if thats a problem ground into the cam? anyway, keep me updated on your progress, and i'll do the same. it looks like we're headin in the same direction
edit: just to let you guys know, i topped out around 390, but i was getting a little knock on the dyno and jeremy said it would be alot worse on the street, so he toned it down a bit.
ya that dip is wierd. not like u feel it though.
i will keep u posted.
Originally Posted by Red99TA
I doubt a pulley is going to get you anywhere near 400 torque like TSP produced.
TB, intake and pulley.
i will hit 400hp after those.
Originally Posted by hugger1975
ya that dip is wierd. not like u feel it though.
i will keep u posted.
i am missing the:
TB, intake and pulley.
i will hit 400hp after those.
i will keep u posted.
i am missing the:
TB, intake and pulley.
i will hit 400hp after those.
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Originally Posted by Red99TA
I'm sure you will hit 400 RWHP after adding those. I was talking about LSONE going from 367 RWTQ to 400 w/ a pulley...not gonna happen.
on another note, do you think its just weak cam performance thats causing low torque, or something else? ie. somethings wrong with my engine