Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

2000 Z28 A4 w/ bolt ons...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2005, 01:33 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
86 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default 2000 Z28 A4 w/ bolt ons...

2000 Z28 A4: 3.42's, SY3500 stall, Pacesetter LT's, TSP duals, LS6 intake, !EGR & !AIR, UD pulley, 160* stat, ported TB, NGK TR6's gapped at .037", GMPP plug wires, SLP lid, FTRA, K&N, NLP tune.

348.0 RWHP & 349.8 RWTQ

433.8 RWHP & 536.8 RWTQ w/ NX 100HP shot
Old 04-02-2005, 01:41 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
DOUBT IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central AL
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You have most of the same stuff that I will have shortly. Only difference is you have NGK TR-6's, FTRA, and 3.42's, and I'm getting the TCI SSF 3500.

I hope that I'll have near the same #'s once I make my car full bolt-on.

Good numbers with the stall, BTW. Was that locked or unlocked?
Old 04-02-2005, 01:47 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
86 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks, I'm satisfied w/ the #'s, just hoping it runs the # at the track tomorrow.

Those #'s are locked and SAE corrected.
Old 04-02-2005, 03:32 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Wicked_Hugger99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: enterprise, AL
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

real good N/A a4 numbers...would've figured a lil rwhp more outta that wet shot though, RW TQ was right on w/ the spray. Congrats
Old 04-02-2005, 05:42 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
86 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks, the bottle pressure was barely 900 psi, I usually shoot for at least 950 psi when I run the car. On the pass in my sig - the bottle pressure was 950+ and I picked up a full 10 MPH spraying from about 500 ft out in 2nd gear. Dunno that a little more bottle pressure would have made lots of difference... but I know the car picks up 10 MPH spraying 1/2 of 2nd and all of 3rd. ::shrugs::

On a side note... I must say my converter impressed me, on the baseline we did one pass unlocked, then a 2nd pass right away locked. My car only picked up 5.4 RWHP locking the converter. I've seen people posting that they lose 10-15 RW w/ their converter unlocked.
Old 04-05-2005, 10:10 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
86 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

A friend of mine was gracious enough to take some video footage of the car on the dyno. Another friend was nice enough to host it for me. Here it is: Dyno
Old 04-06-2005, 01:03 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice numbers. To tell ya the truth though, those locked numbers don't mean **** cause the 'verter isn't going to lock up when under WOT.
Old 04-06-2005, 11:26 AM
  #8  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
86 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BlueSix
Nice numbers. To tell ya the truth though, those locked numbers don't mean **** cause the 'verter isn't going to lock up when under WOT.
That's why I posted the results of locked vs. unlocked before tuning, my converter doesn't seem to eat up as much power.
Old 04-06-2005, 09:54 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
That's why I posted the results of locked vs. unlocked before tuning, my converter doesn't seem to eat up as much power.

Whoops! Sorry, I skipped over that part. That's one efficient converter you have there.
Old 04-06-2005, 09:59 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
86 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BlueSix
Whoops! Sorry, I skipped over that part. That's one efficient converter you have there.
NP, I see a chassis dyno as a tuning tool... the proof was the day after when I ran it at the track. I went 12.292 @ 112.54 N/A on a spinning 1.896 60'. Car is full weight save for the rear seats being removed.
Old 04-06-2005, 10:37 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
NP, I see a chassis dyno as a tuning tool... the proof was the day after when I ran it at the track. I went 12.292 @ 112.54 N/A on a spinning 1.896 60'. Car is full weight save for the rear seats being removed.
that's what i like to hear. low 12's with only 34x rwhp. nice work.
Old 04-17-2005, 09:24 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

those are really good #'s. you figure with a nice cam and heads youll definitely be over 400rwhp mark on an A4.
Old 04-17-2005, 09:30 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
86 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TXZ28LS1
those are really good #'s. you figure with a nice cam and heads youll definitely be over 400rwhp mark on an A4.
Thanks, a forged bottom end 347 is being built currently by EMS, and it will be topped off w/ AFR 205's and a FAST 90mm. Not sure on the cam yet... leaning towards a Futral grind. I'd really like to sort the car out some more and get it to leave harder, then maybe throw on an EWP as that would be my last true "bolt on." I honestly think I can push this thing into the high 11's with enough launch.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.