No offense, but I just don't see how thats possible. 
New bolt-on Dyno Record????
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 9
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by SilverLS1
Car has:
ls6 manifold
mac headers and o/r y
cutout
B&B triflow
ported TB
ported MAF
Aluminum DS
3.73's
z06 clutch
ls6 valley cover
KNN FIPK
Tuned by John weeks (John02SS)
ls6 manifold
mac headers and o/r y
cutout
B&B triflow
ported TB
ported MAF
Aluminum DS
3.73's
z06 clutch
ls6 valley cover
KNN FIPK
Tuned by John weeks (John02SS)
not to mention a pulley...that is why there is something fishy because with full bolt-ons he could be making close to 400rwhp..headers..~5rwhp, fast intake 15rwhp, pulley 10rwhp....that's an extra 30 rwhp est. so that is 410 est rwhp...and that is more than most cammed cars...so i call 
on something...
on something... 
On The Tree
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 1
From: Idabel, OK
Originally Posted by SilverLS1
Car has:
ls6 manifold
mac headers and o/r y
cutout
B&B triflow
ported TB
ported MAF
Aluminum DS
3.73's
z06 clutch
ls6 valley cover
KNN FIPK
Tuned by John weeks (John02SS)
And thats it, typical bolt on car. Doesnt even have a pulley, and has MACs.....And the car PULLS STRONGGGG. Guess he just got a good one. Only bad part is, as we mod it more, it will probably level out with everyone.....yall know how that **** goes.
ls6 manifold
mac headers and o/r y
cutout
B&B triflow
ported TB
ported MAF
Aluminum DS
3.73's
z06 clutch
ls6 valley cover
KNN FIPK
Tuned by John weeks (John02SS)
And thats it, typical bolt on car. Doesnt even have a pulley, and has MACs.....And the car PULLS STRONGGGG. Guess he just got a good one. Only bad part is, as we mod it more, it will probably level out with everyone.....yall know how that **** goes.
no UD pulley? Maybe a short belt mod wouldnt hurt either for a few more dyno ponies?
Did you make a pass without the air filter to see if it made any difference? I'm curious about that one regardless of breaking any records.
What wheels where on it?? great #'s man!!!If these #s are correct some kooks stepped headers, short belt and ASP will put you over 400RWHP.....Ive seen a couple of factory freaks but damn!!!Post some honest track times, and then we will see what we will see...Good luck.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Staging Lane
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Gamefan008
damn, not nearly as bad as i thought 
8 rwhp is still big enough to feel though... hhmmmm
-
8 rwhp is still big enough to feel though... hhmmmm
-
BTW, those are some sick bolton numbers...congrats. I hate dynos, get her to the track.
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
The car pulled 318/334 with only a lid (MTI, paper filter) and muffler (Dynomouth) when I had it.
That was a single pull on a gawd-aweful hot/humid day.
MikeH:
The car had, when you got it:
170* thermostatic fan sensor
Ported MAF
Fernco
Free 160 stat mod
FRA mod
TB bypass
Throttle stop mod
EGR tube mod
PCV update
Fresh plugs
MTI lid
Dynomouth (First one EVER!)
Not much really...
The car was always very strong, I had a feeling that it was a 'freak' of sorts.
FWIW:
Honda ATF works best in the tranny.
The rear has Mobil 1 gear oil with GM posi additive.
The engine has always run synthetic. Syntec at first, but Mobil 1 0w40 for the most part.
Bosch platnums worked best.
Anything under 93 octane and it rattles.
I also always ran Teflon in the engine oil. (Greased Lightning brand... but only the small bottle of pure Teflon, not the big bottle that is mixed with 30w oil.)
I was told long ago, don't know if it's true or not... 98 production saw some shortages of Camaro spec engines and that Vette LS1 long blocks were used during those times. The only difference that might be there if that was the case would be slightly more compression and a slightly more aggressive cam.
Might be a bunch of bull, but the source was knowledgable.
Dave
That was a single pull on a gawd-aweful hot/humid day.
MikeH:
The car had, when you got it:
170* thermostatic fan sensor
Ported MAF
Fernco
Free 160 stat mod
FRA mod
TB bypass
Throttle stop mod
EGR tube mod
PCV update
Fresh plugs
MTI lid
Dynomouth (First one EVER!)
Not much really...
The car was always very strong, I had a feeling that it was a 'freak' of sorts.
FWIW:
Honda ATF works best in the tranny.
The rear has Mobil 1 gear oil with GM posi additive.
The engine has always run synthetic. Syntec at first, but Mobil 1 0w40 for the most part.
Bosch platnums worked best.
Anything under 93 octane and it rattles.
I also always ran Teflon in the engine oil. (Greased Lightning brand... but only the small bottle of pure Teflon, not the big bottle that is mixed with 30w oil.)
I was told long ago, don't know if it's true or not... 98 production saw some shortages of Camaro spec engines and that Vette LS1 long blocks were used during those times. The only difference that might be there if that was the case would be slightly more compression and a slightly more aggressive cam.
Might be a bunch of bull, but the source was knowledgable.
Dave
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
Originally Posted by MikeH Z28
im sure that if i would have done some dyno tricks i could have got a couple more out of it, but like silverls1 said i wanted to see what it dyno'd under normal conditions..i had no intentions of going up there and putting down that kind of numbers. i wanted to know what it made everyday, i could have cared less how much i could have got out of it that ONE time. and for the record, i didnt pull the ac belt off, it locked up on me the other day and slung the belt..trust me, i was pissed. i would trade the few extra horses any day to be able to go somewhere with my windows up!!
Are you sure it locked up?
I threw them left and right just by accellerating aggressively... but the AC always worked when I put the belt back on.
On the post about the car possibly having parts he doesn't know about:
No way.
The car was bone stock, just turned in by a longtime police officer after completing his lease. The car had the original tires on it when I got it. That was in Early 2000. He got the car in late 97 or early 98... don't recall anymore.
Originally Posted by MikeH Z28
well ill try to have the dyno graph up as soon as possbile...its defentely the real thing..i havent ran it at the track yet, i hope to do that friday..hopin to go close to 90mph in the 1/8th
Kyle
With that much timing and that lean a mixture I am sure the dyno numbers are legit.
Sorry dude, but I have beena round quite some time and that much timing and that lean a ARF, I can not see this car running well at the track. I am no tuner that is for sure, but I have seen enough cars tuned to know that that just does not look right.
But I could be wrong. Winter is comming, take it to the track and see what she does. Should be an 11 second car easy.