prc guys your wait is over
any sound clips? I wanna hear what she sounds like!!
just let me and gomer **** this mule we can handle it

In this thread Gomer said that it was locked. The lack of a torque spike also indicates it was locked.

i agree with your assessement of cam and 90/90 gains, that pretty much accounts for the peak to peak and past peak gains. whats the chamber volume of the new head? from my rough guestimations he lost .4 of a point of compression. where does the gain from the new heads come in if any? are the valves the same size as the old set; 2.04/1.585?
i agree with your assessement of cam and 90/90 gains, that pretty much accounts for the peak to peak and past peak gains. whats the chamber volume of the new head? from my rough guestimations he lost .4 of a point of compression. where does the gain from the new heads come in if any? are the valves the same size as the old set; 2.04/1.585?
none the less, just wish there were less changes in between to quantify, but I have never been to a cheap dyno yet... The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
i agree with your assessement of cam and 90/90 gains, that pretty much accounts for the peak to peak and past peak gains. whats the chamber volume of the new head? from my rough guestimations he lost .4 of a point of compression. where does the gain from the new heads come in if any? are the valves the same size as the old set; 2.04/1.585?
I didn't cc the chambers on these heads, but I'd guess they are slightly larger than stock 5.3 chambers because of material taken out when the chambers are CNC'd and also from the material when the valves are unshrouded. I don't think there was very much gain from the old to the new heads, they have the same 2.04 intake valve, but the exhaust is a Ferrea exhaust valve. These were unmilled because I didn't want to flycut Mark's pistons to run the larger cam and we sold his old heads for a good price. The car did 400rwhp before with the higher compression, more aggressive tune, and a smaller cam.. I was expecting around 420rwhp with the lower compression, larger cam, FAST 90 setup, and the rich tune with lower timing.. so it actually turned out a little better than I was expecting.
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
I don't have a way to get any sound clips and I've already delivered the car back to Mark, he lives about 3 hours away from my shop.
I don't have a way to get any sound clips and I've already delivered the car back to Mark, he lives about 3 hours away from my shop.
Which track will you all be going to?
John
John
I then had the car retuned and saw the same 10/10 but much better drivability.


