dyno with new setup..f13 112
11-19-2005, 06:37 PM
#1
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dyno with new setup..f13 112 with a quick street tune, the car pulling 4 degress of timing and through the paper airfilter, cats and the stock muffler, i put down 394/366. still got alot of tuning to do 
thanks to everyone on here thats helped me out!!!
Nino ill try to scan my graph in a bit and post it.
**EDIT:**
thanks to everyone on here thats helped me out!!!Nino ill try to scan my graph in a bit and post it.
**EDIT:**
Last edited by ninobrn99; 11-19-2005 at 06:46 PM.
11-20-2005, 12:35 PM
#6
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+4 of advance. I got the stock muffler because my duals had to go because of the new torque arm a while back. The muffler was $25 and i needed something quick! thats why. I was tired of cleaning the oil off my maf and tb because of the k&n filter. im gonna look for spongy type filter 
11-20-2005, 11:30 PM
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ninobrn99
+4 of advance. I got the stock muffler because my duals had to go because of the new torque arm a while back. The muffler was $25 and i needed something quick! thats why. I was tired of cleaning the oil off my maf and tb because of the k&n filter. im gonna look for spongy type filter
Trending Topics
11-21-2005, 08:36 AM
#9
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rollinna65
Say goodbye to traction 
. How do you like that RAM clutch?
. How do you like that RAM clutch?
11-22-2005, 09:02 AM
#12
Originally Posted by Flawless02SS
A new k&n will never blow oil on the MAF!!!
11-22-2005, 07:21 PM
#14
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats correct. my previous setup was 378/372 with the f10 tuned. this was untuned and with ls6 heads (stock). so far ive gained 16hp and lost 11 lb ft 
11-23-2005, 07:20 AM
#15
Nice HP gains, interesting TQ #'s. What was the LSA and advance of your F10 and where did it peak compared to the F13?
Sorry for all the questions. I've been going back and forth with my decision on these two cams and your answers will help me decide. Still leaning towards the F13 112+2 though.
Sorry for all the questions. I've been going back and forth with my decision on these two cams and your answers will help me decide. Still leaning towards the F13 112+2 though.
11-23-2005, 12:30 PM
#16
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
f10 114..ill have to look at the graph. the f10 pulled hard also. very driveable and easy to tune. This one is giving me big issues with bucking right now. It is how ever a great cam! The numbers are really untuned. Theres so much more left in it. ill post up new numbers when i get them. either cam is a great choice.
12-06-2005, 07:22 PM
#20
11 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those are nice #s Nino. I put down similar numbers w/basically same set up(same cam and heads) + all bolt ons. 392/384 before tuning and 417/397 after tuning.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...&highlight=f13
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...&highlight=f13