Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Very Dissapointed with dyno results today...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2006, 06:22 PM
  #81  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
joshp14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Dragon
Losing close to 20 on your set-up from the cats alone.

Gaining some back from the bump in compression.

Wait a minute . . . do you have cats or not??? O2'S deleted in the back??
They are the jethot cats (junk)...just there to help muffle the rasp and dont do **** for emissions...a month after I had them in it was throwing codes so I just had them rear o2s tuned out.
Old 05-08-2006, 06:26 PM
  #82  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
The Dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Then they are giving you a LOT of restriction for no reason other than noise.

Something is definitely mechanically wrong; you aren't even above 350 tq except for 4700 to 5500 rpm's

Stick your head in the engine bay with the car idling; what does it sound like? Stand on each side of the engine.
Old 05-08-2006, 06:31 PM
  #83  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
The Dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Call up your boy and ask him what were ALL the codes he deleted.

Is the car missing? At what microseconds did he set your detections?
Old 05-08-2006, 06:41 PM
  #84  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
joshp14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Dragon
Then they are giving you a LOT of restriction for no reason other than noise.

Something is definitely mechanically wrong; you aren't even above 350 tq except for 4700 to 5500 rpm's

Stick your head in the engine bay with the car idling; what does it sound like? Stand on each side of the engine.
I cant see them giving too much restriction...they are pretty hollow...oh well its prolly not much HP. I have done a few inspections of the motor since the install...even under the car on a lift at work. No leaks around head gaskets, car sounds like a LS1...normal valvetrain noise...sewing machine sound....I cant hear anything that wasnt there before the heads install.

The car isnt missing, runs great, sounds good, no abnormal sounds. The only code that was in the PCM when it was sent off was a heater performance code for the front O2's.

I dont know a lot of the details on the tune...but I do have the EFIlive file.
Old 05-08-2006, 07:07 PM
  #85  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
The Dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have edit and efilive but I normally tune with Edit. I could look at your file but I gotta figure out how to open it with the efi :o

What fuel pump do you have? I used Racetronix with excellent results.
Old 05-08-2006, 07:41 PM
  #86  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
joshp14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The entire fuel system is still stock.
Old 05-08-2006, 07:58 PM
  #87  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

The next step is the leakdown and compression test. Im betting you find something awry with those....
Old 05-08-2006, 08:11 PM
  #88  
FormerVendor
 
HTMtrSprt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mpls., MN
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Josh,
The first thing I would look at is a data log from EFI live, etc. during a dyno run..... it should show approx 300 g/sec airflow @ 6000 RPM (about 9600 - 10000Hz maf freq.). If it doesn't, then you are not getting any air to move through the engine.... it's an engine/induction/exhaust problem. If it is that high, you likely have a parasitic power loss problem somewhere in the drivetrain..... diff/brakes/driveshaft/trans/etc.

Oh.... btw, I had a car here that dynoed w/ OK a/f but was out of inj.... when we put larger ones in, it picked up 10 HP. I know it's not the 60-80 we're looking for, but it's part of it.

Brian
HiTech Motorsport
Old 05-08-2006, 08:20 PM
  #89  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
HOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sewing machine sound? You need longer PR's
Old 05-08-2006, 08:29 PM
  #90  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
joshp14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HTMtrSprt
Josh,
The first thing I would look at is a data log from EFI live, etc. during a dyno run..... it should show approx 300 g/sec airflow @ 6000 RPM (about 9600 - 10000Hz maf freq.). If it doesn't, then you are not getting any air to move through the engine.... it's an engine/induction/exhaust problem. If it is that high, you likely have a parasitic power loss problem somewhere in the drivetrain..... diff/brakes/driveshaft/trans/etc.

Oh.... btw, I had a car here that dynoed w/ OK a/f but was out of inj.... when we put larger ones in, it picked up 10 HP. I know it's not the 60-80 we're looking for, but it's part of it.

Brian
HiTech Motorsport
Well im surely not going to get it on a dyno again until I have this figured out...I will have to do the logging on the street. Hopefully later this week I will have time to get some of this done with my buddy's EFI Live.

Ill have to try my buddies 7.400" pushrods and see how it changes anything if any.
Old 05-08-2006, 08:42 PM
  #91  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
RaNsOm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HOSS
What duty cycle are the running?
not sure, I'll have to consult my tuner and get back with you on that.
Old 05-08-2006, 09:25 PM
  #92  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by The Dragon
Your statements are misleading.

His car is down close to 80 rwhp . . . maybe more with a proper tune.

If it's a fueling problem . . . then it's a problem with the injectors, pump, etc. getting into the chamber; not duty cycle.

Again, you mislead in your post. We're not just looking for his car to make the "most power" possible . . . he's not down 10 or 20 ponies here dude . . . +80 horsepower is a mechanical problem that is HUGE. Far more than duty cycle.

And 10 degrees of timing ain't gonna find that power

I've been tuning for over 5 years and moderate on a tuning site. He's got a problem somewhere.
This is what I am saying though, if you find 10 hp here and 5 there, the loss may not be as significant as it seems right now. It could be a whole bunch of small things adding up
Old 05-08-2006, 09:27 PM
  #93  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by HOSS
Sewing machine sound? You need longer PR's
exactly, the "sewing machine" sound is not normal by any means. that is an improperly setup valve train. Ben (HOSS) is running teh TRak cam and his HR's are the right length and it makes zero noise. I left mine on the short side for when I mill the heads so I still have a slight noise but nothing really noticable
Old 05-08-2006, 10:00 PM
  #94  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
joshp14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well looks like I have a lot of checking to do...heres whats on the list:

-Replace TR55's with TR6's gapped to .045".
-Perform cylinder compression test (cranking)
-Perform cylinder leakdown test
-Try 7.400" pushrods
-Do some logging to watch Injector DC, knock, and other parameters
Old 05-09-2006, 12:28 PM
  #95  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DanZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cali/Bay Area
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you checked with a PR length checker, and your pre-load is correct, it's not the PR's. I would double check a couple of them for pre-load again though.

I doubt the plug change will do anything for your problem, but a good idea to run the TR6's.

Do the compression and leak down test to rule out those items and do some logging.

If your TB is hitting the bump stop, your getting full WOT.
Old 05-09-2006, 12:49 PM
  #96  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
TeEnAgE pHeNoM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Dragon
Losing close to 20 on your set-up from the cats alone.

Gaining some back from the bump in compression.

Wait a minute . . . do you have cats or not??? O2'S deleted in the back??
Cats are only worth 7-10 hp max. Numbers do seem a little off though. Because my car put down 403RWHP with ported stock heads and a 234/236 588 lift cam and bolt ons. Also my car has cats and no underdrive pulley thats 15-20 hp I am losing right there.

Last edited by TeEnAgE pHeNoM; 05-09-2006 at 12:55 PM.
Old 05-09-2006, 12:55 PM
  #97  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DanZ28
If you checked with a PR length checker, and your pre-load is correct, it's not the PR's. I would double check a couple of them for pre-load again though.
i would still try the 7.400" PR's just to rule them out if they are not the reason because 7.325" PR's seem to be too short.
Old 05-09-2006, 01:25 PM
  #98  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Abdullah
i would still try the 7.400" PR's just to rule them out if they are not the reason because 7.325" PR's seem to be too short.
He's running Morel lifters. The preload is .030" vs .100" of the stock lifters. It requires a much shorter pushrod to achieve .070" less preload.
Old 05-09-2006, 02:36 PM
  #99  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
He's running Morel lifters. The preload is .030" vs .100" of the stock lifters. It requires a much shorter pushrod to achieve .070" less preload.
do you know the plunger depth on those lifters?
Old 05-09-2006, 03:55 PM
  #100  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
joshp14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WDM, Iowa
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
do you know the plunger depth on those lifters?
Just got off the phone with Lunati and he said the plunger depth is same as stock and to set preload at .020-.030. I could have actually got a 7.300" pushrod to get a .025" preload...but I went with the .050" preload instead using a 7.325" pushrod.

I'm thinking the 7.400" pushrods wont do much for me....either way, I'll pull the valve covers off anyway and measure them again this weekend when I do the leakdown and compression testing.


Quick Reply: Very Dissapointed with dyno results today...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.