installed tr224....crappy dyno results
05-09-2006, 10:37 PM
#23
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (87)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
Doesn't matter, did you not read the thread ? Unlocked 3500 stall + dyno = poor numbers. At the track will be a different story.
Everyone knows that stalled A4's aren't dyno queens, but that doesn't always equal poor numbers, but thanks for trying to flame me. Mike
05-10-2006, 01:11 PM
#24
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zspot98
I'm pretty sure that it matters since a mustang dyno is usually about 20% less than a Dynojet. So if this dyno time was on a mustang I'd say it looks about right, but if it was on a dynojet I'd say it was low.
Everyone knows that stalled A4's aren't dyno queens, but that doesn't always equal poor numbers, but thanks for trying to flame me. Mike
Everyone knows that stalled A4's aren't dyno queens, but that doesn't always equal poor numbers, but thanks for trying to flame me. Mike
05-10-2006, 05:20 PM
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zspot98
I'm pretty sure that it matters since a mustang dyno is usually about 20% less than a Dynojet. So if this dyno time was on a mustang I'd say it looks about right, but if it was on a dynojet I'd say it was low.
Everyone knows that stalled A4's aren't dyno queens, but that doesn't always equal poor numbers, but thanks for trying to flame me. Mike
Everyone knows that stalled A4's aren't dyno queens, but that doesn't always equal poor numbers, but thanks for trying to flame me. Mike
05-10-2006, 10:18 PM
#27
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (87)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JDPZ28
I have also "personally" seen a stalled A4 TR224 dyno in the 340's. His #'s are on par, he just needs to take it to the track to give him peace of mind.
I do however that the majority of stalled A4's are s@@t on the dyno.
05-11-2006, 05:19 PM
#28
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zspot98
I personally drive a stalled A4 that recently put down 379 with a 224 cam. This is why I was saying that his "low" numbers might be due to the type of dyno he was on?
I do however that the majority of stalled A4's are s@@t on the dyno.
I do however that the majority of stalled A4's are s@@t on the dyno.
05-15-2006, 05:46 PM
#29
FWIW my previous car made 363 through the TCI SSF3500 on TEAs dyno when they were located in Bowling Green. Car was cam only. TSP 225 on 112, longtubes, ory, Hooker catback, lid, March UD pully, NO ported TB, NO cutout. Take that thing to the track!
05-15-2006, 08:17 PM
#30
Administrator
Originally Posted by BlueSix
Not relevant, comparing M6 dyno numbers to unlocked stalled A4 dyno numbers is like comparing apples to monkeys.
As I recall, monkeys dyno higher.
You're right on the money. Unlocked converter numbers will be skewed.
First, make sure it's tuned. Second, get it to the track then report back.
05-16-2006, 05:20 AM
#31
Tuned with nearly the exact identical mods you have, my A4 with 3600 stall and 3:73 gears made 360/370. That was through MAC's, ported throttle body, and ORY. I had a 220/220 cam on a 112 LSA. Yeah, if the tune was 'right' and the weather conditions were ideal, you should have made a little more power if it was dyno'd on a calibrated Dynojet.
05-16-2006, 11:17 AM
#32
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: From Ohio now in that state up north
Posts: 948
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueSix
Not relevant, comparing M6 dyno numbers to unlocked stalled A4 dyno numbers is like comparing apples to monkeys.
Also it does look like the tc was unlocked and what was air fuel is it tuned?
