mustang vs. dynojet
06-16-2006, 10:35 AM
#21
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I think the Mustang and many other non DJs are more realistic when you add together the proceedural losses, drive train and tire to roller losses. By proceedural losses I mean that chassis dynos normally use the "RPM sweep" method Vs the manufacturer's and most engine dyno's flywheel "RPM step" proceedure which can be 5-10% less of a reading by itself.
06-16-2006, 10:45 AM
#22
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oops, let me restate and hopefully clarify something from my last post, "By proceedural losses I mean that chassis dynos normally use the flywheel "RPM sweep" method Vs the manufacturer's and most engine dyno's "RPM step" proceedure which can cause the chassis dynos to read another 5-10% less by itself."
