Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Stock Cubes, NA and 500RWHP, Possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2006, 03:55 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
lilbuddy1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Friend here in AZ on a stock bottom end running TEA 2.5 ls6 heads, custom EDC cam built to the heads spec, FAST, full bolt ons minus EWP(Verbs old setup) through a 12 bolt and 3.73's ON A NITROUS TUNE put down 492/423
Old 06-26-2006, 04:30 PM
  #22  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
gillbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by theblur98ss
I sure hope anyone that spent the money for a 500hp car isn't running stock rod bolts.
Not everyone has bottomless pockets.

Besides, this wasn't a question of can the stock rod bolts hold 500, it was can you GET TO 500 with stock sized motor. The topic just kinda skewed off for a second.
Old 06-26-2006, 04:36 PM
  #23  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,650
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gillbot
It seems as though with the usual H/C and bolton packages start to fall off at 450RWHP. I was just wondering if anyone got there without going radical.
I'm sure 500rwhp is possible but it would depend on several factors.

I highly doubt that a 500rwhp setup is all that friendly to drive and maintance/reliability must suffer at that state of tune.

Plus you'd probably need a really high CR and high octane fuel to support it.

But mostly I bet it's down to dyno operation. Non-SAE corrected figrues could be noticable higher, also graph smoothing (or lack of) can easily show 20rwhp too high.

Also Dynojet Dyno'd tend to be inertia dyno's and read comaritively high compared to load bearing dyno's.

Example:

500rwhp Dynojet would be about the same as 468rwhp on a Mustang Dyno.
Old 07-02-2006, 08:56 PM
  #24  
On The Tree
 
Dave D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pahrump, NV
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey guys- not to jack the thread, but am considering getting a forged 383 package prebuilt for under $4000. Would a N/A 383 package be able to hit 500 rwhp without power adders?? Gillbot, from what i have found, you can easily get a forged 383 motor for $3500- $4000 without a core exchange! I am thinking that is even better than forging your motor or rebuilding it when the time has come. What do you guys think??
Old 07-03-2006, 02:19 AM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gillbot
I thought the 01-02's had weaker ones.

I'm only spinning to 6800.
Sorry to veer off topic. 98's have weak rod bolts, 99-00 are decent, and 01-02 are the stronger of the group, but still should see much higher than 6500 to be safe.
Old 07-03-2006, 03:07 AM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 11SECDWS6
You need a solid roller to get there.
That's BS. My 2 year old hydraulic heads/cam package is making 490rwhp on 10.9:1 compression through a 12 bolt, 18" wheels, and 4.10's. Bumped up to 11.3:1 in Texas w/ 93 octane which we don't have would give about 500rwhp. Cam is a 236/244 .630/.630 113LSA on TEA Stg. 2.5 LS6 heads
Old 07-03-2006, 04:41 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
lilbuddy1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by verbs
That's BS. My 2 year old hydraulic heads/cam package is making 490rwhp on 10.9:1 compression through a 12 bolt, 18" wheels, and 4.10's. Bumped up to 11.3:1 in Texas w/ 93 octane which we don't have would give about 500rwhp. Cam is a 236/244 .630/.630 113LSA on TEA Stg. 2.5 LS6 heads
Already posted above you my friend
Old 07-03-2006, 06:02 PM
  #28  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
gillbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dave D
Hey guys- not to jack the thread, but am considering getting a forged 383 package prebuilt for under $4000. Would a N/A 383 package be able to hit 500 rwhp without power adders?? Gillbot, from what i have found, you can easily get a forged 383 motor for $3500- $4000 without a core exchange! I am thinking that is even better than forging your motor or rebuilding it when the time has come. What do you guys think??
Why buy a 383 for $4000 when you can get a 402 or 408 for the same price?
Old 07-03-2006, 06:03 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
viewsonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a stock cube LS2 (364)

And I should be running 500+rwhp in a few days
Old 07-03-2006, 06:13 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
gillbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I should have specified LS1.

I thought there were already stock cubed LS2's there.
Old 07-03-2006, 07:24 PM
  #31  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Smartass6885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dave D
Hey guys- not to jack the thread, but am considering getting a forged 383 package prebuilt for under $4000. Would a N/A 383 package be able to hit 500 rwhp without power adders?? Gillbot, from what i have found, you can easily get a forged 383 motor for $3500- $4000 without a core exchange! I am thinking that is even better than forging your motor or rebuilding it when the time has come. What do you guys think??

Thats just for the short block. Plan on atleast another $2k for the H/C and other supporting mods.

-Blaze
Old 07-04-2006, 10:35 PM
  #32  
On The Tree
 
stik6shift93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Naperville
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldn't expect to make more peak horsepower with a stroker, more torque and area under curve though. Adding bore is what gives you more power. There are a few out there who have done 500rwhp, stock rear end, ewp, fast intake....all the little tricks are needed to get there. With all the new heads out there now i think it may be a little easier to get there. As far as the highest stock displacement, i believe futral put down 550rwhp with a high compression solid roller motor, that's the highest i've seen on stock displacement, with a 10 bolt 560-565 would probably have been possible.
Old 07-06-2006, 09:57 AM
  #33  
CARTEK Racing
iTrader: (13)
 
WS6TransAm01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sickss228
CARTEK 4x 507.9RWHP daily driver and the cam is smaller than T-REX! My setup made 472 on a fresh rebuild pulling 1 in vaccuum because I had stock bellows, getting an updated tune soon and I should be over 490RWHP

Thanks for the mention.

That is my car: 507.9RWHP and 433.6RWTQ with a hydrolic roller cam, stock LS1 bottom end with 63K on it and ported LS6 heads. This is through 4.56 gears in a 12-bolt as well.

Compretion is just slightly higher then stock due to the heads being decked to be strait.
Old 07-06-2006, 10:04 AM
  #34  
CARTEK Racing
iTrader: (13)
 
WS6TransAm01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton

I highly doubt that a 500rwhp setup is all that friendly to drive and maintance/reliability must suffer at that state of tune.
I drive it all the time, to school, to the shore, to dinner with the GF etc.

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
Plus you'd probably need a really high CR and high octane fuel to support it.
I run premium pump gas, 93 in NJ and have a slightly higher then stock CR. right around 11:1 - 11.25:1


Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
But mostly I bet it's down to dyno operation. Non-SAE corrected figrues could be noticable higher, also graph smoothing (or lack of) can easily show 20rwhp too high.
Graph smoothing was "5" and the 507.9RW was SAE corected



Im an not trying to be a dick, just saying that with the right parts, and the right tuner it can be done reliably, safely and effectivly.
Old 07-06-2006, 01:03 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
 
HAULNTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MPLS MN
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WS6TransAm01
...that with the right parts, and the right tuner it can be done reliably, safely and effectivly.
I agree.
Old 07-06-2006, 06:21 PM
  #36  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
gillbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I knew it COULD be done, I'm just curious what it takes to get there. From what i've read, you have to go pretty far to get there but 400-450 with a good H/C is rather easy.
Old 02-13-2007, 12:01 AM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (61)
 
00turboT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 20 Minutes North of ATL
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by matt346ls1
I think that the 500rwhp cars are on friendly dynos.

Matt
100% AGREE
Old 02-13-2007, 02:42 AM
  #38  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
mcamarols1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ive must of been on a mean one numbers in sig

but im happy and thats all that matters, i race on the street/track not on the dyno
Old 02-13-2007, 03:20 AM
  #39  
TECH Apprentice
 
NOS USER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

gillbot : I think with TFS heads + Ven.. Custom Cam + 90/90 ported intake & all bolt- ons get ya in 495-510rwhp range ...try to search man .

Thanks.

Last edited by NOS USER; 02-13-2007 at 04:14 AM.
Old 02-13-2007, 07:11 AM
  #40  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
miami993c297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Power number in my sig, plus a respectable amount of torque for a 346ci...

And Yes it's a DD!!!!

Christian



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.