Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

my torquer2, PRC ls6 budget heads, FAST 90/90 dyno #s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2006, 12:00 PM
  #21  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLACKNREDSS
so does anybody have a guestamation of what the SAE #s would be?
The people that dynoed your car can give you that. STD will typically be higher than SAE. Also, with the barometric pressure reading around 29.40 on your dyno runs, you were probably given a bit of a slightly inflated reading (since actual baro was in the 29.90-30.0 range). Not to worry, your actual SAE readings with the proper barometer readings are probably still within 10-15 rwhp of what you posted. Nice combo!
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 07-19-2006, 01:28 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
99zman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

sae would be lower #'s and why is it so hard for some h/c cars to break 400tq
Old 07-19-2006, 02:19 PM
  #23  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
01SSRMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So I saw the name on your dyno sheet. John Butts. Used to have a friend with that name in NC that I've lost touch with. Didn't know if that was your name or a name of someone at the speed shop or a random one typed in.
Old 07-19-2006, 02:28 PM
  #24  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
RoastEmSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thats my name plz keep the jokes to a min. my dads name is also John but hes never been to NC
Old 07-19-2006, 03:01 PM
  #25  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
01SSRMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ah, ok. That's cool. I didn't think my friend had gone to MO. Last I heard he co-owned an engine shop in Ohio. We used to car pool to school in my Black SS and he was talking about getting one, thought maybe he finally did. Nice car and great numbers. That is one of the setups I've been looking at after I get through the wedding this fall.
Old 07-19-2006, 04:15 PM
  #26  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
ls2 bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in your closet
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

are u still running a 10 bolt? i didnt realize those numbers werent corrected. still nice numbers though.
Old 07-19-2006, 04:18 PM
  #27  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
RoastEmSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yep stock 10 bolt
Old 07-19-2006, 04:53 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

You would have had a lot better torque if you would have went with a .040 cometic head gasket
Old 07-19-2006, 05:27 PM
  #29  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
ls2 bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in your closet
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
You would have had a lot better torque if you would have went with a .040 cometic head gasket
but wouldnt u need valve reliefs with the .040 cometic.
Old 07-19-2006, 06:04 PM
  #30  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
1slowls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lancaster, MA
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
What type of dyno was this on? Was it corrected? And what level of graph smoothing was used?

All of these factors can easily make 20-40rwhp difference in final readings compared to other cars on other dyno's.
It was on a dynojet, sae corrected, and i believe the level of smoothing was zero
Old 07-19-2006, 08:26 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
HOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1slowls1
It was on a dynojet, sae corrected, and i believe the level of smoothing was zero

not sae
Old 07-19-2006, 09:12 PM
  #32  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
RoastEmSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i almost went with cometics but i didnt want to deal with them leaking, yea yea i know copper spray but i dont care, its not like 397rwtq is little
Old 07-19-2006, 10:05 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

no he wouldnt need valve reliefs with a cam that size and the stock size valves in those heads.

Their is no reason why the cometics would leak if everything is set up properly.

But hey...your car made good power anyway...I was just saying you could have made even more with some cometics.

Congrats...be careful with it...you dont want to end up in a tree like I did
Old 07-20-2006, 02:03 AM
  #34  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
BuBbABFP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Salinas, Ca
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLACKNREDSS
so does anybody have a guestamation of what the SAE #s would be?
Around 437whp+/- BTW siick!! numbers!
Old 07-20-2006, 01:42 PM
  #35  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
TNTramair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ne philly
Posts: 2,743
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

nice numbers....i have the same set up without the valve job and without the 90/90...it put down just as much torque (396.7) but less hp (424.3) un-tuned. hopefully when i put the 90/90 on there and tune it i see a little more.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.