Mustang Verses Other Dynos
anyone else going on "personal campaigns."
anyone else going on "personal campaigns."
LS1tech.com stating that certain dynos can or cannot be manipulated and no one else challenges such misinformation, I will continue to correct it.
anyone else going on "personal campaigns."
"The truth of it is you can not fudge a Dynojet, the software does not let you."
"You can make a Mustang Dyno or Superflow read anything you want, to name a few dial-a-hp dynos."
"Mustang dyno's can be altered to give high or low results."
"A Dynojet is the industry standard when it comes to dyno numbers. They cannot be altered to change the output."
I think that we have others with "personal campaigns", at least I admit it.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Dynos are only good for measuring improvements on the same engine on the same dyno.
Not sure I'd buy the inflated numbers don't sell because a huge market is based around "improper horsepower gains", after all ricer math has sold for decades

I have a Dynojet 248 and have been told it reads low compared to other Dynos locally.
It's a tuning tool, leave it at that
Last edited by zzracer; Dec 28, 2021 at 08:11 AM.
Valuable tuning tools both Mustang & DynoJet.
The idea of SAE numbers at rear wheels is laughable because SAE is a FLYWHEEL standard as specified. That's typical internet speak. STD is the rear wheel standard. However, none of that silly hair splitting really matters because any given dyno is only as good as its operator, how well its been maintained and calibrated.
Between different well maintained, correctly calibrated and operated DynoJet's that are 700 miles apart in different climates - I've seen less than 1 % of difference.
If one is really serious about hp accuracy on a chassis dyno, pull the rear brake pads as they can rub and cost 10 whp, get the car fully up to operating temperature then do 10 dyno runs in the same configuration and average the results. That gives a more accurate picture 📸
DynoJet's can be VERY consistent and that’s often very important to race teams and a big factor in how DJ's became wide spread and popular.
Ultimately, how fast it runs at the track is what matters. Both Mustang's and DynoJet's excellent tools.
One also has to use a bit of common sense looking at dyno results too. Say we have a car in Arizona or somewhere that's very hot, dyno'd on a day the air temp is 110F degrees. Car has a trusty Racetronix 255 w/hot wire fuel system that can support up to 600 whp.
With a Correction Factor CF of 1.25, the Forced Induction car makes 725 whp according to the dyno. Fuel system maxed out during dyno run.
The 725 whp Dyno results look nice on paper.
We should all realize in COLDER 🥶 air that's a disappointment maybe disaster waiting to happen. The fuel system can't actually support 725 whp.
That's just a correction factor illusion. No one should surprised the car won't run like 725whp car should.
Accuracy is debatable between the 2.
Inertia dynos are often more repeatable as long as there are no traction issues.
Dual roller brake dynos can have their number vary quite a bit based on allowed acceleration rates, etc.
Example: Using a Dyno Dynamics (The Hearbreaker) in both N/A 4-cylinder mode and boosted V8 modes will give greatly different results.
Can you manipulate a MD dyno? I've read you can but I haven't. There's so much **** in that program I'd have no idea where to start.
I will say with a 100% certainty that changing the vehicles weight does not effect power numbers. Multiple times over the years, I've either selected the wrong vehicle, customer or customers vehicle, ran it, realized my mistake and changed it to the correct vehicle and the numbers didn't change.
There's actually a lot of really good info in this thread that there is no reason to repeat.
There are two things people say when comparing MD and DJ.
"The DJ shows better numbers than a MD" and "Well you can manipulate a MD." That's their entire argument when defending a DJ.
Look in every dyno thread on the internet and I promise those statements will be there.
It's tool and that's it. What it's used for most of the time is so people can brag how much their car puts out but never go out and actually prove it.
When Don came and helped set up our dyno years ago. I told him all that thing is, is a big dick measurer.
Can you manipulate a MD dyno? I've read you can but I haven't. There's so much **** in that program I'd have no idea where to start.
I will say with a 100% certainty that changing the vehicles weight does not effect power numbers. Multiple times over the years, I've either selected the wrong vehicle, customer or customers vehicle, ran it, realized my mistake and changed it to the correct vehicle and the numbers didn't change.
There's actually a lot of really good info in this thread that there is no reason to repeat.
There are two things people say when comparing MD and DJ.
"The DJ shows better numbers than a MD" and "Well you can manipulate a MD." That's their entire argument when defending a DJ.
Look in every dyno thread on the internet and I promise those statements will be there.
It's tool and that's it. What it's used for most of the time is so people can brag how much their car puts out but never go out and actually prove it.
When Don came and helped set up our dyno years ago. I told him all that thing is, is a big dick measurer.

(Local shops term... ) LOLI've used a Super Flow , both engine and drive on, When the motor moved from the engine unit to the drive on, the calculated crank was always close enough. But fully equipped, and factory set up they require a bucket of blood to purchase, and they have pretty rigorous cal and setup.
To many people get caught up in high dyno numbers then get walked by a car supposedly making less hp. Increasing correction factors and blowing on weather stations may blow up a customer’s ego however their track results will surely hurt them internally.
If rolling the dice, I’d take a XXX rwhp mustang tuned car over a XXX rwhp dynojet car any day.












