Bolt-on dyno record
02-06-2007, 03:58 PM
#42
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2002/Black/SS
i made 330wheel with only a lid and no exhaust, im sure with headers and a tune with an elctric WP i could of made 380
my car was a freak, i beat my friends 02 SS with his intake exhaust and headers everytime with just my lid and xhaust
my car was a freak, i beat my friends 02 SS with his intake exhaust and headers everytime with just my lid and xhaust
My car ran 12.18 @ 113 with the mentioned mods plus pulley at 3500lbs in 1000ft DA. But 400rwhp was not going to happen.
02-06-2007, 06:58 PM
#43
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I had a friend that got a new 02 WS6 M6 in 03 it was one of the last new one out! But anyway's he was smoking people with bolt on and we didn't no why. So we took it to the dyno and bone stock it put done 333whp!!! Well it turned out it had ls6 heads from the factory!!!! Someone said that they ran out of ls1 head on the last of the production line so they used ls6 heads on them 
02-06-2007, 06:59 PM
#44
Originally Posted by DansRedz28
I had a friend that got a new 02 WS6 M6 in 03 it was one of the last new one out! But anyway's he was smoking people with bolt on and we didn't no why. So we took it to the dyno and bone stock it put done 333whp!!! Well it turned out it had ls6 heads from the factory!!!! Someone said that they ran out of ls1 head on the last of the production line so they used ls6 heads on them
You sure?
02-07-2007, 01:58 AM
#46
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kantucky
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PewterZ28
Man, that is so close to the claimed 50rwhp that his tuner can get. 
What the hell kind of username is molester anyway? Why not just make it child_molester or something.
What the hell kind of username is molester anyway? Why not just make it child_molester or something.
02-07-2007, 08:38 AM
#47
Molester,
There is a good chance that the Mustang Dyno you were on was calibrated to read like a Dynojet. The only way to know for sure is to go to a dynojet and run it there and compare numbers.
Have you run it down the track yet? If so what was your trap speed?
There is a good chance that the Mustang Dyno you were on was calibrated to read like a Dynojet. The only way to know for sure is to go to a dynojet and run it there and compare numbers.
Have you run it down the track yet? If so what was your trap speed?
02-07-2007, 12:38 PM
#49
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kantucky
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
Molester,
There is a good chance that the Mustang Dyno you were on was calibrated to read like a Dynojet. The only way to know for sure is to go to a dynojet and run it there and compare numbers.
Have you run it down the track yet? If so what was your trap speed?
There is a good chance that the Mustang Dyno you were on was calibrated to read like a Dynojet. The only way to know for sure is to go to a dynojet and run it there and compare numbers.
Have you run it down the track yet? If so what was your trap speed?
my highest trap was 107.15 and i dont know if it would make a diff but i dont power shift.
02-07-2007, 02:19 PM
#51
TECH Addict
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Owings, Md
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should be around 365-370 on a dynojet once the ls6 intake and ud pulley go on. 330 now on mustang dyno+ 15hp for those bolt ons times 7% for difference between mustang dyno and regular dyno =370, not too shabby. crossing my fingers
02-07-2007, 04:26 PM
#52
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MOLESTER
my highest trap was 107.15 and i dont know if it would make a diff but i dont power shift.
You sure you makin' 333rwhp on a Mustang or can you not drive? J/W
02-07-2007, 04:34 PM
#53
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
When i dynoed 340/350 with a clogged fuel filter! A/F was 14.9, stock tune 
I traped 110mph with a 13.5 pass with a 2.2 60ft with some tires i ran a 12.7 at 111.mph with a 1.8 60ft so with if your not getting traction you mph will be up. Put some tires on it i bet you mph will be lower! But your over all time will be faster! MY car had full tank of gas and everything in car with a 260lbs driver
I traped 110mph with a 13.5 pass with a 2.2 60ft with some tires i ran a 12.7 at 111.mph with a 1.8 60ft so with if your not getting traction you mph will be up. Put some tires on it i bet you mph will be lower! But your over all time will be faster! MY car had full tank of gas and everything in car with a 260lbs driver
02-07-2007, 04:39 PM
#54
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine ran 13.006@110mph and wasn't spinning, I left off-idle 'cause the 18s won't hook worth a **** if you leave any higher. And my tune isn't exactly from the best of tuners, either.
All I'm saying is a car that traps 107mph is NOT makin' 333rwhp on a Mustang dyno unless the driver absolutely sucks.
All I'm saying is a car that traps 107mph is NOT makin' 333rwhp on a Mustang dyno unless the driver absolutely sucks.
02-07-2007, 04:43 PM
#55
Originally Posted by TroubledWine3
Mine ran 13.006@110mph and wasn't spinning, I left off-idle 'cause the 18s won't hook worth a **** if you leave any higher. And my tune isn't exactly from the best of tuners, either.
All I'm saying is a car that traps 107mph is NOT makin' 333rwhp on a Mustang dyno unless the driver absolutely sucks.
All I'm saying is a car that traps 107mph is NOT makin' 333rwhp on a Mustang dyno unless the driver absolutely sucks.
02-07-2007, 08:27 PM
#56
TECH Regular
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: okc, oklahoma
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MOLESTER
all I have is a descreened maf sensor in my 02 SS and i made 333whp on a mustang dyno, are you all sure that 370-380 is all that you are capable of? The local ls1 tuner in my area told me he gets any where fro 30-50 added whp from a tune only. Add that with some headers, intake, throttle body and some exhaust and i think it would easily be over 400 on any dyno.
Im sure that it makes some differece you being on an island AT sea level. I got my car tuned in another state where the altitue was about 2000ft higher. I need to go get it dynoed here and see what kinda gain i make.
02-07-2007, 11:33 PM
#57
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i could see the 00 and earlier cars making a little more than the 01-02 cars because of the better cam.but 400 thats a little much.the guy that done my tune said it was worth 21hp on a stock car.but i didnt get the tune for a stock car.
02-07-2007, 11:56 PM
#58
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
i could see the 00 and earlier cars making a little more than the 01-02 cars because of the better cam.but 400 thats a little much.the guy that done my tune said it was worth 21hp on a stock car.but i didnt get the tune for a stock car.
02-08-2007, 12:01 AM
#59
Originally Posted by Justin00SS
What about the 1.8RRs?
Which I will never buy. I'd get a set of harland sharps or yella terra 1.7s to go with whichever cam I choose. lol
Which I will never buy. I'd get a set of harland sharps or yella terra 1.7s to go with whichever cam I choose. lol
Originally Posted by Justin00SS
Gaining hp from a tune is a by product.
The main aspect of a tune is not to gain hp but to make the car run more efficiently.
If fix a problem like running way to rich or way to lean. Make the car more streetable or all out race tune.
Sometimes this leads to gains in hp. But just because a car makes the most hp with one tune doesn't mean its the best tune for car/engine or that the engine is running at its best.
I'd say ~10-15rwhp MAX with a tune on a bolt-ons N/A car.
Max. If it were forced induction then yeah you can gain as much as 100hp. lol
The main aspect of a tune is not to gain hp but to make the car run more efficiently.
If fix a problem like running way to rich or way to lean. Make the car more streetable or all out race tune.
Sometimes this leads to gains in hp. But just because a car makes the most hp with one tune doesn't mean its the best tune for car/engine or that the engine is running at its best.
I'd say ~10-15rwhp MAX with a tune on a bolt-ons N/A car.
Max. If it were forced induction then yeah you can gain as much as 100hp. lol
02-08-2007, 12:37 AM
#60
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kantucky
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TroubledWine3
My **** made 333rwhp and 345rwtq on a dynojet and traps 110mph, and I don't speed shift it. And that's on some 18x9.5 Z06 wheels with Kumho Ecsta 712s that don't let me get any lower than a 2.1 60ft.
You sure you makin' 333rwhp on a Mustang or can you not drive? J/W
You sure you makin' 333rwhp on a Mustang or can you not drive? J/W