Uhh Ohhh, Vengeance doesnt break 500rwhp........
#21
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ron@Vengeance
Your comments in EVERY thread I post are not only not wanted, but do nothing for the content of the thread...
Why dont you bring your lil C5 over and see if it hits 530 on our dyno... I have a feeling it might hurt your feelings
Find a hobby
Why dont you bring your lil C5 over and see if it hits 530 on our dyno... I have a feeling it might hurt your feelings
Find a hobby
My dyno numbers were done on a factory-calibrated 248 Dynojet, not a flashed and reflashed and reflashed 224
I have nothing against you or anyone else on this site. You simply aren't going to make 383ci low-end torque with a 346 and a 240/244 cam. :shrug:
Kudos
#23
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brad8266
^^^ Funny because I made 385 lbs-ft @ 3500rpm's on my 346CI engine with a 232/236 cam, wasnt on a dynojet either.
385 lbs-ft with a 232/236 and a 346ci is normal.
#24
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kraest
How is that funny? Obviously you missed the point
385 lbs-ft with a 232/236 and a 346ci is normal.
385 lbs-ft with a 232/236 and a 346ci is normal.
#25
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brad8266
There are a number of big cams out there that are making big power down low. Many of these werent done at Vengeance too.
You're still missing the point. :shrug:
#26
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kraest
We're talking about 440-450 lbs-ft with a 346, not 385 lbs-ft.
You're still missing the point. :shrug:
You're still missing the point. :shrug:
#28
And this is a factory calibrated 224x that is 10 months old.. Good try though ..
Originally Posted by Kraest
It won't hit 530. It'll hit about 560.
My dyno numbers were done on a factory-calibrated 248 Dynojet, not a flashed and reflashed and reflashed 224
I have nothing against you or anyone else on this site. You simply aren't going to make 383ci low-end torque with a 346 and a 240/244 cam. :shrug:
Kudos
My dyno numbers were done on a factory-calibrated 248 Dynojet, not a flashed and reflashed and reflashed 224
I have nothing against you or anyone else on this site. You simply aren't going to make 383ci low-end torque with a 346 and a 240/244 cam. :shrug:
Kudos
#29
Thats the problem, you are spending so much time behind your keyboard you have gotten left behind the times... there are TONS of cars out there making 440rwtq with heads/cam....Dont worry though, you are still superior with your stroker motor
Originally Posted by Kraest
We're talking about 440-450 lbs-ft with a 346, not 385 lbs-ft.
You're still missing the point. :shrug:
You're still missing the point. :shrug:
#39
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont see Karest with that small of a cam making that much power out of a 408. Its all in the set-up but there are 408s with perfect combos making that power with much larger cams, and aftermarket heads.
Ron, you mentioned you couldnt go all out on this combo, what is different from this car to any of the others that hit or went over the 500 mark?
Ron, you mentioned you couldnt go all out on this combo, what is different from this car to any of the others that hit or went over the 500 mark?
#40
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ron@Vengeance
Thats the problem, you are spending so much time behind your keyboard you have gotten left behind the times... there are TONS of cars out there making 440rwtq with heads/cam....Dont worry though, you are still superior with your stroker motor
hrmm.... exactly what is wrong with a stroker motor???