520rwhp 418cid A4 PRC CNC L92 Results
04-12-2007, 10:12 PM
#21
TECH Regular
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by squealingtires
what's the SCR and DCR for that combination?
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
520rwhp in a a4 through cats seems pretty damn good to me. At 11:1 the car drives awesome & works really well with a tiny 2800 stall!
Still curious about the DCR for that camshaft? Thats a really nice looking torque curve.
04-12-2007, 10:21 PM
#22
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Burkesville,Kentucky
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KAOS
this is nearly a 550+ rwhp car through a 6 speed. i think this is an absoulty beautiful thing. i still dont see many cathedral port cars making that kind of power per dollar. so what king of price tag does this combo carry?
04-12-2007, 10:31 PM
#23
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
damn .... I cant wait to slap my HKE/Greg Good combo together! Personally I dont give a rats *** if it only does 500rwhp..... it better make 800 on the hose though!
Good numbers fellas!
Good numbers fellas!
04-12-2007, 11:42 PM
#24
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lake Jackson,TX
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Forteen3GT
damn .... I cant wait to slap my HKE/Greg Good combo together! Personally I dont give a rats *** if it only does 500rwhp..... it better make 800 on the hose though!
Good numbers fellas!
Good numbers fellas!
They are the best in the business!! I love my 408/ET245`s-greg good heads! 
04-13-2007, 09:22 AM
#26
very nice power! I am looking hard at this setup but may stay with my heads and fast 90 when I do my 408 to get started. I am looking for more down low tq than hp any ways. Not that I will make the tq the l92's made, just more then my 346 is giving me
04-13-2007, 09:38 AM
#27
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Granbury Texas
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very nice through an auto. I bet in a m-6 it would be a street beast.
On a side note TSP builds a great motor as well as anybody. I have had 3 builds from them and I tried to tear up the last one just to justify a big stroker build up. All 3 build-ups were impecable and made the power they told me to expect.
On a side note TSP builds a great motor as well as anybody. I have had 3 builds from them and I tried to tear up the last one just to justify a big stroker build up. All 3 build-ups were impecable and made the power they told me to expect.
04-13-2007, 10:47 AM
#28
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
lost cause, do you understand how a bigger stall converter never locking up going through a 4L60e can not in any way compare to your dyno queen drlveline?
surely your joking??? if not.... you must have been drunk.
i didnt realize a corvette IRS and a mcleod street twin clutch with steel flywheel was in any way shape or form a "dyno queen"
as far as budget and dollar per HP.. this is not exactly a "low cost" build... this a freaking 418 guys... a 418 with heads that flow more than most ported cathedral ports right out of the box untouched...
im not debating this car is not wicked, or that it doesnt make power or that its not a cheap and very effective build... i just dont understand why exatly these engines arent making more power than this..
if somebody would like to explain to me how 10 more cubes than me, and heads that flow wicked good, and an intake that flows wicked good.. is only netting about 20-30 more rwhp than my setup (my setup is budget to the highest extent of the word minus the shortblock) im all ears to hear the reasoning..
not saying it doesnt make good power.. just saying i would expect more... i am yet to see any of these monster ported cars hitting 580-590 RWHP... which is what id expect for those flow numbers and those cubes with all the supporting mods.
04-13-2007, 11:51 AM
#29
wow, a street twin disc. impressive. better run 10.50s or better with that dyno lost cause. do i need to make a post of how many times you have gone into posts that deal with L92 stuff and ridculed it? wait, thats a real lost cause. you have seriously got caught up in flow numbers and making sure everyone realizes your car spins the dyno rollers REALLY fast.
making over 500 rwhp with a 3500 stall automatic is a damn impressive setup. you obviously have no experience setting up or tuning an auto car to race.
making over 500 rwhp with a 3500 stall automatic is a damn impressive setup. you obviously have no experience setting up or tuning an auto car to race.
04-14-2007, 10:38 PM
#32
Originally Posted by LostCauseZ06
if somebody would like to explain to me how 10 more cubes than me, and heads that flow wicked good, and an intake that flows wicked good.. is only netting about 20-30 more rwhp than my setup (my setup is budget to the highest extent of the word minus the shortblock) im all ears to hear the reasoning..
not saying it doesnt make good power.. just saying i would expect more... i am yet to see any of these monster ported cars hitting 580-590 RWHP... which is what id expect for those flow numbers and those cubes with all the supporting mods.
Just think if we put a little more camshaft, 11.8 compression, ported l76 intake, electric water pump, and a ASP pulley on that thing. It's easy to see where 580 is doable, but sometimes max power isn't what the customer is after.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
04-14-2007, 10:49 PM
#33
Originally Posted by LostCauseZ06
surely your joking??? if not.... you must have been drunk.
i didnt realize a corvette IRS and a mcleod street twin clutch with steel flywheel was in any way shape or form a "dyno queen"
as far as budget and dollar per HP.. this is not exactly a "low cost" build... this a freaking 418 guys... a 418 with heads that flow more than most ported cathedral ports right out of the box untouched...
im not debating this car is not wicked, or that it doesnt make power or that its not a cheap and very effective build... i just dont understand why exatly these engines arent making more power than this..
if somebody would like to explain to me how 10 more cubes than me, and heads that flow wicked good, and an intake that flows wicked good.. is only netting about 20-30 more rwhp than my setup (my setup is budget to the highest extent of the word minus the shortblock) im all ears to hear the reasoning..
not saying it doesnt make good power.. just saying i would expect more... i am yet to see any of these monster ported cars hitting 580-590 RWHP... which is what id expect for those flow numbers and those cubes with all the supporting mods.
i didnt realize a corvette IRS and a mcleod street twin clutch with steel flywheel was in any way shape or form a "dyno queen"
as far as budget and dollar per HP.. this is not exactly a "low cost" build... this a freaking 418 guys... a 418 with heads that flow more than most ported cathedral ports right out of the box untouched...
im not debating this car is not wicked, or that it doesnt make power or that its not a cheap and very effective build... i just dont understand why exatly these engines arent making more power than this..
if somebody would like to explain to me how 10 more cubes than me, and heads that flow wicked good, and an intake that flows wicked good.. is only netting about 20-30 more rwhp than my setup (my setup is budget to the highest extent of the word minus the shortblock) im all ears to hear the reasoning..
not saying it doesnt make good power.. just saying i would expect more... i am yet to see any of these monster ported cars hitting 580-590 RWHP... which is what id expect for those flow numbers and those cubes with all the supporting mods.
sad
04-16-2007, 11:22 AM
#34
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
I think I can explain it to you. Your cam is larger & this car is 11:1 compression. Keep in mind I built this thing to run good behind a TINY converter. I have no doubt I could build a 580rwhp one if someone wants to be a little bit more radical & send me over the cash money to build one up the way I'd like to run one. I have many other camshaft designs sitting here that I haven't mentioned, but that worked pretty well on the engine dyno.
Just think if we put a little more camshaft, 11.8 compression, ported l76 intake, electric water pump, and a ASP pulley on that thing. It's easy to see where 580 is doable, but sometimes max power isn't what the customer is after.
Just think if we put a little more camshaft, 11.8 compression, ported l76 intake, electric water pump, and a ASP pulley on that thing. It's easy to see where 580 is doable, but sometimes max power isn't what the customer is after.
thanks for the reply
thats what i was looking for 
05-20-2008, 08:30 AM
#37
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You said that it was designed to work with a 2800 stall....did your customer change the stall because your original post states a 3500 stall? I think the numbers would look even better with the 3500 vs 2800 stall.
