Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars
View Poll Results: Which correction factor would you want to be the standard here?
SAE
92.21%
STD
2.60%
Uncorrected
2.60%
Don't care
2.60%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Which dyno correction factors would you want to be the standard here?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2007, 11:21 AM
  #21  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
rmitchell242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sae is the only way that I run my dyno. I had a ricer tuner come in and rent my dyno for a few hours last week and he changed it to std and pissed me off. Of course his numbers were up about 20 from what they are sae so I guess that is what you do if you have a Neon.....
Old 06-17-2007, 12:18 PM
  #22  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The best thing would be that all the dyno's are calibrated the same too,but that would never happen
Old 06-17-2007, 06:21 PM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
98SS2836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dracut, MA
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
The best thing would be that all the dyno's are calibrated the same too,but that would never happen
And All at sea level
Old 06-18-2007, 01:07 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
ibanez7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas, from Crystal Lake IL
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SAE smoothing 5
Old 06-25-2007, 11:05 AM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ibanez7
SAE smoothing 5
Some cases, like mine, smoothing can give a false peak number (mine was 484) so in the case of false peaks at the end, I do not think full smoothing is best. If it is not there, I agree.
Old 06-27-2007, 09:28 AM
  #26  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Someone mentioned if we correct dyno numbers why not correct track numbers. Certainly makes sense here, why should you correct dyno numbers when you live in Denver where the air is thin and you don't make the power like the sea level states? I only know of a few people who use correct track numbers but honestly thats the only way you can get everything to line up.

For example A denver guy dyno's 400rwhp corrected but only runs 13.5 @ his local track due to altitude. So is he right to say his car dynos 400rwhp or that his car goes 13.5s? I'm tired of the dyno BS around here, who cares if your car makes xxxrwhp sure its good on paper but it ONLY makes that power when you car sees @ 77 degrees and 29.2 inches of pressure.

So what happens when you go to the track and run a 12.5 because your @ 4000' and its 90 degrees outside? Do you correct it to match your "corrected" dyno numbers or do you keep telling people you have a corrected 400rwhp car that runs uncorrected 12.5s?
Old 06-27-2007, 10:52 AM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
WeathermanShawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denver International Airport, Colorado USA
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, Phil it is an endless arguement. Dyno readings vs track times, corrected numbers vs uncorrected.

Same issues plague many sports from track & field to boxing divisions.

Racing/track times have many variables, from tire selection to the weight of the car.

The dyno is attempting to eliminate as many variables as possible. While the dyno reading may not be as important to the pure racer involved in competition, for the average enthusiast it may provide you with the only objective way to measure a performance gain.

Interestingly enough, the NHRA actually does has a correction factor for altitude, but that would probably not be a very practical solution.

I can understand your point. For the true racer, who cares about dyno readings. It's is who wins that counts. But for the average enthusiast, dyno readings carry a huge marketing advantage.

Everyone just wants them fair so you can make an educated decision.
Old 06-27-2007, 10:56 AM
  #28  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
badpewter-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: RI
Posts: 5,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

plus there is no math for the "driver" correction
unless everyone ran a perfect run everytime




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.