MTI 2008 C6 After Kooks Headers and X
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 1
From: Western Burbs of Detroit
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
We've tested LG's against Kooks 1 7/8 many times. Back/back Kooks made same/more power everytime across the rev range.Sorry, but it is the truth on Ls1's, Ls6's ect. If you want to compare then buy the headers and do back/back testing.If you don't it's not worth fighting about it 
It's nice to see the new motor's putting out all the power in stock form
It's nice to see the new motor's putting out all the power in stock form
Slowhawk you are the man and I am not qualified to argue with you but I am going to make this comment: They (lgm) tested and showed that the Kooks only made 1 or 2 hp more peak and were way off compared to LG's Pro longtubes in the midrange area ( power under the curve ) where it counts most. Just asking. I looked at the graph myself. You can too on their website.
Originally Posted by 01FormulaTA
LG's car did 418rwhp 413rwtq with just LG Headers no cats, so they are pretty close in comparison
Is the LS2 still made for any other cars in the GM line-up? Wouldn't make a lot of sense for the new Camaro to carry something different requiring a different production setup, so the LS3 "may" be what it gets in the end (or I hope it does). I am in need of a car and have been waiting and saving. My DD just passed two year inspection so now I am good until it comes out.
