Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

odd dyno results from stock ss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2007, 12:22 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Camaro Ryder KV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default odd dyno results from stock ss

I just mustang dyno'd my 01 ss. its completly stock, 308 rwhp and 321 rwt STOCK thats 354.2 hp and 369.2 torque at the crank, 1320 is 13.44 @104 mph......what the hell is up with that??!?!? its STOCK, stock to the air filter.......factory freak???
Old 07-23-2007, 12:59 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Mr.MartyStone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Screwston, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Where are you getting these random numbers from? Unless you put motor on an engine dyno you don't know what it is making. It trapped 104 mph, seems like every other stock ls1 f-body ever, what is so factory freak?

Marty
Old 07-23-2007, 01:15 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Camaro Ryder KV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

numbers from the factory are rated at the motor, mine were at the wheels, add 15% to make up for drivetrain loss
Old 07-23-2007, 01:18 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
LS1Tuner_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bentonville,AR
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hey man, our Fbody club dyno'd yesterday. my friends SOM complete stock 01 z28 put down 326 to the wheels, while my stock z28 put down 307 hp to the wheels. some are just stronger than others....
Old 07-23-2007, 01:44 AM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
N01SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

MIND BOGGLING NUMBERS!

"2001 Camaro SS 5.7L V8 354.2 hp 369.4 Torque (STOCK) Dyno Proven"

Seriously dude, everyone goes by whp...
I trapped 109 stock, so yours is no freak
Old 07-23-2007, 02:32 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
BayAreaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not a freak and just aveage numbers
Old 07-23-2007, 03:48 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Mr.MartyStone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Screwston, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by N01SS
MIND BOGGLING NUMBERS!

"2001 Camaro SS 5.7L V8 354.2 hp 369.4 Torque (STOCK) Dyno Proven"

Seriously dude, everyone goes by whp...
I trapped 109 stock, so yours is no freak

Exactly my point. Your ENGINE hp numbers AREN'T dyno proven. There is no magical exact percentage that all cars lose through the drivetrain, and is a guesstimation at best. Take those silly *** numbers out of your signature, thanks for playing.

Marty
Old 07-23-2007, 08:41 AM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
edcmat-l1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Not to mention they were from a mustang dyno, which you can actually make read HIGHER than a DJ.
Old 07-23-2007, 08:43 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
mattraypharbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: palmharbor/Clearwater,FL
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i put down 315 rwhp stock completly though a a4....i went 13.3 at 110.
Old 07-23-2007, 09:02 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Camaro Ryder KV
thats 354.2 hp and 369.2 torque at the crank,
That's a contrived number but if it makes you feel better to tell your friends you make 354.2 HP more power to you. Just don't bet against a car that the owner tells you makes 350 HP. He - like everyone else - will be talking rear wheel.
Old 07-23-2007, 09:15 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
1SPRY99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ERIE, PA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I Did 307 Rwhp And 106 Mph Trap Speed W/109k Stock. 99 Z28
Old 07-23-2007, 01:36 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Camaro Ryder KV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn guys, sorry, i thought it wasn't ordinary for those numbers. i did mention 308 and 321 to the wheels, its not like im hiding that, i know those are the "true" numbers
Old 07-23-2007, 03:16 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
blu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

sounds like the norm for an ls1 M6 f-body, all the car needs now is the driver mod looking at your times posted.
Old 07-23-2007, 03:25 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Camaro Ryder KV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its an a4
Old 07-23-2007, 05:04 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
matt3383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dyno numbers are just that and should be taken as that. Every dyno is different and will read different. Prove the numbers att he track thats the only way.
Old 07-23-2007, 05:30 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
02 Camaro SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rockland County, NY
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No one talks about engine hp estimates.
Old 07-23-2007, 05:40 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
~RedLineLs1~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pueblo, Colorado
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Camaro Ryder KV
numbers from the factory are rated at the motor, mine were at the wheels, add 15% to make up for drivetrain loss
F-bodies were underrated from the factory FWIW.

Regardless, those are good #s for an A4.
Old 07-23-2007, 06:03 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
Vandy16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

don't tell anyone, but ls1's are underrated from the factory. pretty sure nobody else knows about this, so keep it on the DL.





just kidding man,the numbers are good, sounds like a fun car.

rob
Old 07-24-2007, 05:05 PM
  #19  
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
ThaBirdMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ar-kan-saw
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Those are good numbers for a stock car. Be proud
Old 07-24-2007, 11:07 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Asmodeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The car is a strong runner. If you want to know about what you'd make on a dynojet.. add 10% You'd be around 335rwhp on a dynojet since those read high.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.