odd dyno results from stock ss
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just mustang dyno'd my 01 ss. its completly stock, 308 rwhp and 321 rwt STOCK thats 354.2 hp and 369.2 torque at the crank, 1320 is 13.44 @104 mph......what the hell is up with that??!?!? its STOCK, stock to the air filter.......factory freak???
#4
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bentonville,AR
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
hey man, our Fbody club dyno'd yesterday. my friends SOM complete stock 01 z28 put down 326 to the wheels, while my stock z28 put down 307 hp to the wheels. some are just stronger than others....
#7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by N01SS
![EEK !!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_eek2.gif)
"2001 Camaro SS 5.7L V8 354.2 hp 369.4 Torque (STOCK) Dyno Proven"
Seriously dude, everyone goes by whp...
I trapped 109 stock, so yours is no freak
Exactly my point. Your ENGINE hp numbers AREN'T dyno proven. There is no magical exact percentage that all cars lose through the drivetrain, and is a guesstimation at best. Take those silly *** numbers out of your signature, thanks for playing.
Marty
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Camaro Ryder KV
thats 354.2 hp and 369.2 torque at the crank,
#12
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
damn guys, sorry, i thought it wasn't ordinary for those numbers. i did mention 308 and 321 to the wheels, its not like im hiding that, i know those are the "true" numbers
#17
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pueblo, Colorado
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Camaro Ryder KV
numbers from the factory are rated at the motor, mine were at the wheels, add 15% to make up for drivetrain loss
Regardless, those are good #s for an A4.
#18
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Secret](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/secret2.gif)
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
just kidding man,the numbers are good, sounds like a fun car.
rob