Im doubting the LS3 dynos....
Originally Posted by RC45
Who posted anything about stock LS3's dynoing over 400 to the wheel?
There were posts about tuned/header/intake cars making 400, but nothing abotu stock cars from what I recall.
So, I hear that the new Viper will only be making 600bhp... wow and its still gonna weigh like 2 tonnes - I can't wait to meet one on the streets
There were posts about tuned/header/intake cars making 400, but nothing abotu stock cars from what I recall.
So, I hear that the new Viper will only be making 600bhp... wow and its still gonna weigh like 2 tonnes - I can't wait to meet one on the streets
-Geoff
If I drove a Viper I would feel like a fool too. How do you even get off talking about stock horsepower levels. I know guys like you who are afraid to mod there cars and have to depend on the factory and lots of money. My sons have used camaros that have 400 rwhp, big deal. I bet you wear designer jeans when you go out to punk lesser cars in your big bad Viper.
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Ha ha ha ha..
7 year Army infantry solder here...You go be an Infantry solder for even a 7 day field problem and then you'll realize how lame the desgner pants thing is...
Rich wife????
ha ha ha ha...
Rich to me is 500 grand plus a year..Im no wear neat that..Not even half that...Just an upper middle class if anything..
Me and my "rich wife" have been running a buisness together for the past few years...
As far as calling my wife a bitch..Whats the use of me saying anything. We both no what any man would do to any man who referred to his wife as a bitch..But being as were probaly thousands of miles away from each other..It'd be a waste of my time...
Again thanks for the info guys and i apologize for my chosen " **** sucker" words..
On viper Alley this isnt a big deal..And for a second I forgot were I was..Again I apologize
7 year Army infantry solder here...You go be an Infantry solder for even a 7 day field problem and then you'll realize how lame the desgner pants thing is...
Rich wife????
ha ha ha ha...
Rich to me is 500 grand plus a year..Im no wear neat that..Not even half that...Just an upper middle class if anything..
Me and my "rich wife" have been running a buisness together for the past few years...
As far as calling my wife a bitch..Whats the use of me saying anything. We both no what any man would do to any man who referred to his wife as a bitch..But being as were probaly thousands of miles away from each other..It'd be a waste of my time...
Again thanks for the info guys and i apologize for my chosen " **** sucker" words..
On viper Alley this isnt a big deal..And for a second I forgot were I was..Again I apologize
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ChucksZ06
If I drove a Viper I would feel like a fool too. How do you even get off talking about stock horsepower levels. I know guys like you who are afraid to mod there cars and have to depend on the factory and lots of money. My sons have used camaros that have 400 rwhp, big deal. I bet you wear designer jeans when you go out to punk lesser cars in your big bad Viper.
Is my sig visable????
SRT10's dyno 435-465 rwhp SAE on dyno jets...They trapp 119-123 mph..400 rwhp..Yea you know plenty of guys that have that, good for you..
My 1999 Viper dynoed 410 rwhp bone stock..No biggie...The one i have now would even dyno higher stock..but it's not stock..
Again is my sig visable??? Everyone of my cars was modded
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 1
From: Western Burbs of Detroit
Thanks for posting the LG Motorsports graph bro. Shows exactly what you get in stock form vs the k&n, header, and tune version. BTW the x4 cam they put in got around 480 something. 
Sick power.
Sick power.
Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Easy Killemall !! You know that type of **** will get you a vacation. No need to be in the realm of 25 psi. You post a lot of good info. Albeit mostly straight from the recent M/T or C/D but still useful. Continue being an asset not an *******. Ok buddy, pep talks over. 
I have never posted ANYTHING from MT or CD. Go back to viperalley.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Thanks for posting the LG Motorsports graph bro. Shows exactly what you get in stock form vs the k&n, header, and tune version. BTW the x4 cam they put in got around 480 something. Sick power.
Sick power.With the cam and tune was 506/454 rwhp. Damn!!!
Killemall, I apologize for the bitch comment. You seem to be hell bent on starting trouble lately...why?
While we're on the subject, why would the 2008 Viper with an additional 90hp "only" trap 3mph higher than the previous model?
While we're on the subject, why would the 2008 Viper with an additional 90hp "only" trap 3mph higher than the previous model?
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 1
From: Western Burbs of Detroit
Originally Posted by WHPLASH
With the cam and tune was 506/454 rwhp. Damn!!!
Yeah Dennis you are correct. The 480 + rwhp was what the car made with the new cam and the factory tune. Amazing !! I was surprised it ran well enough with the factory tune to do a full pull. After tuning was complete they found themselves with another 20 or so rwhp.
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Killemall
And it could possibly be the air...In really bad conditions there were a few 1996-2002 Viper reviews that only trapped 117...
. I was trapping 115. My car has trapped 110 also on a very humid summer night. Driver can also make a difference here as always. 
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 02ZOh6
I was at the track with a 99 RT 10 (personalized plate) and it was only trapping 110 . I was trapping 115. My car has trapped 110 also on a very humid summer night. Driver can also make a difference here as always.
. I was trapping 115. My car has trapped 110 also on a very humid summer night. Driver can also make a difference here as always.Sure it wasnt a 1992-1995 rt10???
Those trapp 110-114 mph
Lowest trapp I ever saw a mag get was 116.8...Highest was 121.1 for the 1996-2002 Vipers...
As for the LGmotorsport numbers..I dont beleave them for a second..
No offense the LGM..But with my c5 I remember there BONE STOCK graphs always seeming pretty high in order to make there after market performance numbers even higher...
Maybey that is or isnt the case hear.. Time will tell when we see real dynos..
Im not gonna go find threads from all the internet..But there is a lot of hype about 400 rwhp and 11's bone stock..
I was doubting it due to what the LS2's dynoed and the LS3's trapp speeds.
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Killemall
Sure it wasnt a 1992-1995 rt10???
Those trapp 110-114 mph
Lowest trapp I ever saw a mag get was 116.8...Highest was 121.1 for the 1996-2002 Vipers...
Those trapp 110-114 mph
Lowest trapp I ever saw a mag get was 116.8...Highest was 121.1 for the 1996-2002 Vipers...
Originally Posted by Killemall
Im not gonna go find threads from all the internet..But there is a lot of hype about 400 rwhp and 11's bone stock..
-Geoff
Quote Killemall: Im not gonna go find threads from all the internet..But there is a lot of hype about 400 rwhp and 11's bone stock..
Please find some for us or even one, because no one on the board has heard or seen this.
Lock this thread!!! If you don't have proof, this thread is useless.
Please find some for us or even one, because no one on the board has heard or seen this.
Lock this thread!!! If you don't have proof, this thread is useless.
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 1
From: Western Burbs of Detroit
Originally Posted by Killemall
As for the LGmotorsport numbers..I dont beleave them for a second..
No offense the LGM..But with my c5 I remember there BONE STOCK graphs always seeming pretty high in order to make there after market performance numbers even higher...
Maybey that is or isnt the case hear.. Time will tell when we see real dynos..
No offense the LGM..But with my c5 I remember there BONE STOCK graphs always seeming pretty high in order to make there after market performance numbers even higher...
Maybey that is or isnt the case hear.. Time will tell when we see real dynos..
As far as LG posting high stock dynos to make there mod numbers higher....That makes no sense. If anything they would want to release lower base numbers so that when modded it would show a larger gain over stock and create more marketing excitement. Get real killemall. You just busted on yourself so bad. Another point to make, if you don't trust LG's dyno numbers, then go look at MTI's, MTI released even higher bone stock numbers. Only way MTI could get higher numbers would be if they are tweaking them, or they got a test mule with more break in miles on the clock. Killemall you are a decent guy, at least I think so, but some of the **** you post is *** backwards. Take a chill for a minute.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Damn, sounds like theres alot of jealous F-body guys in here. Killemall never sounded like a nut swinger. He even make a point SEVERAL times that he created the thread with an open mind and wanted to see what the real story behind the LS3 is. He never deviated from that at all and only blew up after a bunch of little kids started flaming.