Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Low numbers.....need help!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2007, 06:32 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Low numbers.....need help!

Just got my car dynoed after the cam install and was disappointed with the numbers it put down. Sorry, I don't have any numbers before the cam install. It was tuned on a Dynojet with 26*degrees total timing and 12.7:1 A/F. It's a cam-only '99 M6 Camaro LS1 with most all the bolt-ons:

-I still have the LS1 intake
-LT headers, 3" true duals with Xpipe w/ sweet thunders, no cats
-MTI lid with K&N, smooth bellows, Granatelli mass air
-LS7 clutch, ported LS6 oil pump, LS2 timing chain
-hardened Comp 7.450” pushrods/ stock rockers/lifters
-Patriot Dual springs kit

Cam Specs
Comp Cams XFI/XE-R lobes
Dur @.050 231.5/230.8
Lift .617"/.593"
LSA 110.7


The motor runs really strong...no missing, no smoking.....just don't understand why the numbers were so low what are your thoughts?
Attached Thumbnails Low numbers.....need help!-nate-99-camaro-dyno.jpg  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:24 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
waSStock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Fl
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

99 heads, LS-1 intake, still a little fat on the tune, mine liked 28 degrees...
Old 09-25-2007, 07:51 PM
  #3  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

What was your dyno # before the Cam?
Old 09-25-2007, 09:21 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

waSStock-
The guy who tuned it mentioned that he normally sets the total timing to 28* on most of the LS1's he tunes, but he said for some reason mine didn't like it at 28, he said it was knocking during mid-range and lost power so he had to back it off to 26 degrees total timing, he didn't seem to know why....

Slowhawk-
Sorry, I don't have a dyno# before the cam
Old 09-25-2007, 09:46 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
waSStock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Fl
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What plugs are you running? Are you still runnung the stock PCV system?
Old 09-26-2007, 08:11 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by waSStock
What plugs are you running? Are you still runnung the stock PCV system?
I just intalled new NGK-TR55 Iridiums gapped to .055" the day before the tune. Yes the PVC system is stock, is that bad?
Old 09-26-2007, 09:02 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Jefro6996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Macomb, MI
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

swap the intake for a used ls6 intake. you should be able to find one used on the forum for under $350. Still a little low though.
Old 09-26-2007, 09:59 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jefro6996
swap the intake for a used ls6 intake. you should be able to find one used on the forum for under $350. Still a little low though.
Yea, but the LS6 intake is only good for what? maybe 10-15 more, if that even? There still has to be another issue...
Old 09-26-2007, 11:16 AM
  #9  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nate, do a leakdown on the engine to see if it is healthy and go from there. I suspect some oil consumption due to the decrease in timing I was able to run.

BTW, I tuned nates car. Numbers are below average for what he has.
Old 09-26-2007, 11:27 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mikey
Nate, do a leakdown on the engine to see if it is healthy and go from there. I suspect some oil consumption due to the decrease in timing I was able to run.

BTW, I tuned nates car. Numbers are below average for what he has.
Will do mike, I'll let u know
Old 09-26-2007, 04:06 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
John02Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rogers, Ark.
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Have you cleaned your maf or air filter lately? Have you replaced your fuel filter before?
Old 09-26-2007, 05:07 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by John02Hawk
Have you cleaned your maf or air filter lately? Have you replaced your fuel filter before?
Yes, it's a K&N air filter and I just cleaned it a couple weeks ago. I have a Granatelli MAF which doesn't have a screen, would it still need cleaned? No, I never replaced the fuel filter since I've had the car.
Old 09-26-2007, 05:34 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
waSStock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Fl
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mikey
Nate, do a leakdown on the engine to see if it is healthy and go from there. I suspect some oil consumption due to the decrease in timing I was able to run.

BTW, I tuned nates car. Numbers are below average for what he has.
+1 on the oil issue. The stock PCV system is known for allowing oil to enter the intake tract. This will typically show up as detonation for a number of reasons. Eliminate any oil entering the intake, clean the top end, perform the leak down and then pay your tuner another visit.
Old 09-26-2007, 07:47 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by waSStock
+1 on the oil issue. The stock PCV system is known for allowing oil to enter the intake tract. This will typically show up as detonation for a number of reasons. Eliminate any oil entering the intake, clean the top end, perform the leak down and then pay your tuner another visit.
OK thanks, will also check PVC system. I will do some research on here about a better PVC setup. Is there a good PVC setup that you recommend?
Old 09-26-2007, 11:13 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mikey
Nate, do a leakdown on the engine to see if it is healthy and go from there. I suspect some oil consumption due to the decrease in timing I was able to run.

BTW, I tuned nates car. Numbers are below average for what he has.
Mike, have you experienced any oil consumption issues with the '99 PVC setup?
Old 09-27-2007, 02:46 AM
  #16  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
dirtbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah something definately isn't right. I put down 363 with similar mods (ls1 intake) and my motor isn't even broken in yet. I also have a 224 cam and cats...

I would do a leakdown my bet is your engine is losing compression.
Old 09-27-2007, 07:47 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
waSStock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Fl
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

www.hovis.cc/Firebird_HTML/pcv_mod.htm

I've been running this set up for years. Works great. There are other options using seperator cans and what not, but this has been flawless for me.
Old 09-27-2007, 08:47 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Jefro6996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Macomb, MI
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i would delete the pcv and just run a breather and connect the two valve covers in the rear. i agree the ls6 is only worth 10-15 to the wheels, but with that added it would have some closer to average numbers. So it could put him at 375-380rwhp which isnt that bad for a cam only car and if he fixes the issues with timing could be 385-390rwhp.
Old 09-27-2007, 03:40 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
 
EarlSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Burkesville,Kentucky
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jefro6996
i would delete the pcv and just run a breather and connect the two valve covers in the rear. i agree the ls6 is only worth 10-15 to the wheels, but with that added it would have some closer to average numbers. So it could put him at 375-380rwhp which isnt that bad for a cam only car and if he fixes the issues with timing could be 385-390rwhp.
I agree... with an ls6 intake he'd be alot closer to the average. An ud pulley and a ported throttle body combined the ls6 should put him right with all the other cam only cars. Plus we gotta remember all dynos read a little different.
Old 09-28-2007, 10:24 AM
  #20  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nseldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EarlSS
I agree... with an ls6 intake he'd be alot closer to the average. An ud pulley and a ported throttle body combined the ls6 should put him right with all the other cam only cars. Plus we gotta remember all dynos read a little different.
I agree....I would get more with a ported TB, LS6 intake, and UD pulley but I think my numbers are still low for this cam with my current setup. I'm going check out my PVC system for oil intake issues and also do the leak-down test to make sure everythings OK. Thanks everybody for the help



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.