2008 C6 Z06 graph, small boltons

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 10, 2008 | 11:52 PM

#21

thatboyvic

Launching!

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 242

Likes: 0

wow very nice numbers

Jul 19, 2008 | 10:06 AM

#22

Jimmyz

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 1,574

Likes: 1

From: Marietta, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frost

Not too bad, spent an evening digging through a file before the first one I did. At first glance the HO table looks a bit funny through WOT until you see the accompanying PE/COT adder. I like the Maf arrangement. This car was in the mid 10s AFR overall and touched down into 9something:1 for a brief instant.

Thanks for the nice words, wish I had one too!

Isn't that just FAT AS HELL 10's and 9's for A/R ratio?? Was that stock when it read that? My LS3 was 11.2:1 stock. Very fat from the factory indeed.

Jim

Jul 23, 2008 | 01:51 PM

#23

camaro98z28

11 Second Club

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 710

Likes: 0

From: Peoria, AZ

I thought 2006+ Z06 vettes put down 470+ RWHP stock. Was this a Mustang Dyno? either way, I wish my Z would have put down those numbers with a tad work.

Jul 23, 2008 | 02:17 PM

#24

Jimmyz

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 1,574

Likes: 1

From: Marietta, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by camaro98z28

I thought 2006+ Z06 vettes put down 470+ RWHP stock. Was this a Mustang Dyno? either way, I wish my Z would have put down those numbers with a tad work.

470+ whp that'd be a negative. I've seen a few do 455+ but never 470 @ the tire. Anyway, dyno #'s don't me squat anyway. Those Z06's are monsters on the track!

Jul 23, 2008 | 02:34 PM

#25

camaro98z28

11 Second Club

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 710

Likes: 0

From: Peoria, AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmyz

470+ whp that'd be a negative. I've seen a few do 455+ but never 470 @ the tire. Anyway, dyno #'s don't me squat anyway. Those Z06's are monsters on the track!

For sure and tru dat. Wish I had one