Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Very dissapointed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2008 | 09:00 AM
  #61  
DANOZ28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
From: MPLS MN
Default

a good way to compare is find a club that has a dyno day. then you'll see how you stack up. i have had dyno numbers well below what i thought my mods should run, but my car runs and drives great. so i should be happy.
Old 03-24-2008 | 09:10 AM
  #62  
bluebeast's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 578
Likes: 1
From: greenville sc
Default

yep the numbers dont mean anything if the car is running what it should.....if its running kinda crappy and your numbers are lower than start looking for problems!
Old 03-24-2008 | 09:53 AM
  #63  
landonew's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL.
Default

Wow, I would expect better #s than that as well. I love it when people say, "Don't worry about dyno #s". For the most part, this is fair because of variables. I mean there is not a reason to complain about 10-15 or evn 20 hp. But when your car is not even in the ballpark of what it oughta be putting down, as a customer I will be concerned (and rightfully so). I completely understand what you are saying.

For instance, we have a similar setup (except I have AFRs, a smaller cam, and the fast 90/90) and If my car had put down say 360, I would have been pissed. I know that 435 is a little lower than expected, but since it was in the ballpark I wasn't bothered by few hp, but again it WAS in the ballpark, and yours is not.

I would suggest that you take it to another tuner, with a different dyno and have them tune it. This will give you a better idea of if it's the parts (highly doubtful), the tune, or the dyno.

FWIW, patriot heads are not going to cause anyone to LOOSE hp. That is rediculous. Are they as good as aftermarket castings? No, AFR, TFS, & ETP aftermarket castings are superior to ported gm castings. This does not mean they aren't effective. The folks at patriot know what they are doing, and are not selling a junk product like suggested by bluebeast. They are a budget head no doubt, but that does not mean they are junk.
Old 03-24-2008 | 10:21 AM
  #64  
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 2
From: Austin, TX
Default

OP, definitely get it on a dynojet and get that converter locked. You should definitely see some more appropriate numbers for the setup. That said, get rid of those Patriots if you can. I've got them and they just plain suck. They're the first thing to go when I get the money to redo the combo.
Old 03-24-2008 | 10:25 AM
  #65  
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 2
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by ExceSSive
my car with PP stage 2 heads and TR224 cam made like 391/370 but improved over 1.1 seconds after a gain of 80hp.
No way!!! My car actually made MORE power than someone else with the same heads/cam? Granted my cam was actually a 224/228 with more lift on a 113, but it was through a 12-bolt, heavy driveshaft, and with 4.10s.

I'm just shocked. I was going for lowest h/c LS1 in the world with my 400/367 (you win on the torque side, though). Was yours an A4?
Old 03-24-2008 | 06:41 PM
  #66  
jessedale98's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Southern Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by landonew
Wow, I would expect better #s than that as well. I love it when people say, "Don't worry about dyno #s". For the most part, this is fair because of variables. I mean there is not a reason to complain about 10-15 or evn 20 hp. But when your car is not even in the ballpark of what it oughta be putting down, as a customer I will be concerned (and rightfully so). I completely understand what you are saying.

For instance, we have a similar setup (except I have AFRs, a smaller cam, and the fast 90/90) and If my car had put down say 360, I would have been pissed. I know that 435 is a little lower than expected, but since it was in the ballpark I wasn't bothered by few hp, but again it WAS in the ballpark, and yours is not.

I would suggest that you take it to another tuner, with a different dyno and have them tune it. This will give you a better idea of if it's the parts (highly doubtful), the tune, or the dyno.

FWIW, patriot heads are not going to cause anyone to LOOSE hp. That is rediculous. Are they as good as aftermarket castings? No, AFR, TFS, & ETP aftermarket castings are superior to ported gm castings. This does not mean they aren't effective. The folks at patriot know what they are doing, and are not selling a junk product like suggested by bluebeast. They are a budget head no doubt, but that does not mean they are junk.

Finally, someone that gets me!


Well, i cant very well go to another tuner, without getting it on a dynojet first to see if im where I think I am. This dyno I used that got me lower numbers reads REAL low. Like a 500rwhp cobra dyno'd 430rwhp on this particular style. So we'll see if its the dyno, but if it isnt, someone is giving my 400$ back or tuning it like it should be tuned.
Old 03-24-2008 | 06:45 PM
  #67  
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Default

thats crazy low, my car just LTs, 3" ORY. Hooker CB, and 80mm TB w/ whisper lid put down more =(
Old 03-24-2008 | 06:56 PM
  #68  
jessedale98's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Southern Oklahoma
Default

well there are a lot of variables the only thing that keeps me sane is this.

My unlocked coverter is losing 20rwhp, and this dyno is low by about 45-75rwhp. I cant base my numbers on this, but it gives me a bit of hope with a new dyno.

Bet your car cant run a 12.2@110 like mine did with 300rwhp 290rwtq
Old 03-25-2008 | 08:27 PM
  #69  
SlayerMaro's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 1
Default

If it makes you feel better, I only put down 360whp unlocked on a Mustang dyno with my setup.

But this thread makes me feel better. Check out the numbers people are putting down, and see what they run at the track. Especially the A4's. https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-tech/839667-guys-360-380hp-what-s-your-track-times.html
Old 03-25-2008 | 10:23 PM
  #70  
Johnnystock's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 38
From: Canada
Default

Blame the dyno, I'm sure you'll do a nice time on the track. My car did 390rwhp and I'm faster than a lot a lot of guys that are claiming high numbers...
Old 03-25-2008 | 11:53 PM
  #71  
04ctsvfl's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 1
Default

Check fuel pump, I dont like that Dip in the curve, looks like it has a hiccup, then begins to rebuild power.
Old 03-26-2008 | 03:01 AM
  #72  
01black's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: orange*county, ca.
Default

u'd be suprised what a freer flowin exh can p/u.....im runnin a T2 cam with edelbrock stepped headers to a TSP dual kit with magnaflows...i picked up 20hp and 18 ft lbs from the pacesetter/ory/borlamouth set up i previously had...that and my tuner is a perfectionisnt
Old 03-26-2008 | 03:23 AM
  #73  
jessedale98's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Southern Oklahoma
Default

Im just trying to get to the all mighty DynoJet so I can find out if I have to blow my car up.
Old 03-26-2008 | 07:49 AM
  #74  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by 1989GTA
It's a Dyno Dynamics dyno. You can not compare it to say a Dyno Jet. It reads a lot lower. Lower than even a Mustang dyno.

The numbers are probably real good.
No they dont, Ive had my car on both and it dynoed the same within 3 hp of each other.
Old 03-26-2008 | 09:03 AM
  #75  
jessedale98's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Southern Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
No they dont, Ive had my car on both and it dynoed the same within 3 hp of each other.
your the only one i've ever heard of doing that.
Old 03-26-2008 | 09:04 AM
  #76  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by jessedale98
your the only one i've ever heard of doing that.
Maybe dyno operator error??
Old 03-26-2008 | 09:23 AM
  #77  
jessedale98's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Southern Oklahoma
Default

dude it has to be.
Old 03-29-2008 | 02:12 AM
  #78  
nine-eight's Avatar
Launching!

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Default

take it to a more common unit like a dynojet and retry it. just like a flowbench that takes measurements off of an industry standard and can be manipulated, a dyno is still just a tuning tool and readings will vastly differ all depending on what system it uses and what the variables are set at......

good luck!

Last edited by nine-eight; 03-29-2008 at 02:26 AM.
Old 03-30-2008 | 03:05 AM
  #79  
Johnnystock's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 38
From: Canada
Default

every dyno/operator/car/weather is different and that changes numbers...even one mustang dyno can put down high numbers;its all left to the operator from what I read.Plus the torque is always higher on a dynojet,usually. Try a search on dynos,youll understand real fast that dyno is tool to tune, not the absolute truth out there.

The real way to mesure your hp;line up to another car rated from the factory
Old 03-30-2008 | 02:17 PM
  #80  
jessedale98's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Southern Oklahoma
Default

I agree, that why Im trying to get it to the track. aswell as a dynojet.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.