mod path for 02 GT
03-18-2009, 05:43 PM
#21
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for what its worth if you put some boost to the 2 valves n get that tired bottom end out of the way they will make good power. buddy just put an f1a on his gt made 700 to the tire with pump gas and meth injection
03-18-2009, 06:49 PM
#23
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep.....2V's can be quick. freshen up the internals and boost her. They are naturally TQ'y too.
03-18-2009, 08:35 PM
#24
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: eastern shore, VA
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now....As for your comments about G35s and 350Z's...I have a VERY hard time believing you 'killed' New edges all day long assuming both were stock. Your avg. 350Z (slightly quicker than a G35) is upper 13 car...that is spot on with a new edge GT. Aside from the 07+'s which are mid 13s.
Also..for those bashing the guy on looks and taste...come on man......if everyone had the same taste it would be a boring world....aside from everyone driving a car that looks like it should be at the bottom of a lake or on a Disney/Pixar film.
but i'll pass along everything to my buddy, plus i told my brother-in-law this guy wanted to get into mustangs and he was all excited to tell him everything in the world about them.
03-18-2009, 08:36 PM
#25
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: eastern shore, VA
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now....As for your comments about G35s and 350Z's...I have a VERY hard time believing you 'killed' New edges all day long assuming both were stock. Your avg. 350Z (slightly quicker than a G35) is upper 13 car...that is spot on with a new edge GT. Aside from the 07+'s which are mid 13s.
:
but i'll pass along everything to my buddy, plus i told my brother-in-law this guy wanted to get into mustangs and he was all excited to tell him everything in the world about them.
03-18-2009, 11:45 PM
#26
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well you may have a hard time believing it but its true, when i had my G35 coupe i raced a few i have no idea if they were manual or auto or if they underestimated me and started in the wrong gear but i know i pulled right away, why is it so hard to believe when you look at the power my intake exhaust and flashed g35 although never dyno'd had to be making near 275+ to the wheels, in a 3500 pound car, a "new edge" mustang didnt make that to the CRANK how could i not whip that ***.
but i'll pass along everything to my buddy, plus i told my brother-in-law this guy wanted to get into mustangs and he was all excited to tell him everything in the world about them.
but i'll pass along everything to my buddy, plus i told my brother-in-law this guy wanted to get into mustangs and he was all excited to tell him everything in the world about them.
I can't decide between the "gaining all DL loss plus 15hp with intake, exhaust and box tune" or the mere fact that you are actually trying to claim power numbers with no dyno time or TS, for being the funniest to laugh at.
03-18-2009, 11:51 PM
#27
but i think building a motor and boosting it is out of this kids options. but it sure is nice to have a mustang with so many parts to choose from when building it and the parts are usually inexpensive which is nice. Last edited by 180ls1; 03-18-2009 at 11:58 PM.
03-19-2009, 10:30 AM
#28
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think they "feel" torquey because thay have no top end but i think building a motor and boosting it is out of this kids options. but it sure is nice to have a mustang with so many parts to choose from when building it and the parts are usually inexpensive which is nice.
but i think building a motor and boosting it is out of this kids options. but it sure is nice to have a mustang with so many parts to choose from when building it and the parts are usually inexpensive which is nice.Oh....and building a mod motor is hardly inexpensive. TRUST me.
03-19-2009, 01:09 PM
#32
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey we-todd, it was in response to this;
You're a waste of space and bandwidth 99 Z28
nope...take a look at their powerband on a sheet. They actually have nice TQ. I'm a 4V guy, but I give credit where it's due. Hell, IRUN11's TQ numbers weren't too far off from my OLD (that's for you Ben) DSG N/A mach. I think that 'feel' you are referrign to is what gets ignorant fools a false impression of having a chance against a quicker car though. LOL
Oh....and building a mod motor is hardly inexpensive. TRUST me.
Oh....and building a mod motor is hardly inexpensive. TRUST me.
03-19-2009, 01:50 PM
#33
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-19-2009, 01:51 PM
#34
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nope...take a look at their powerband on a sheet. They actually have nice TQ. I'm a 4V guy, but I give credit where it's due. Hell, IRUN11's TQ numbers weren't too far off from my OLD (that's for you Ben) DSG N/A mach. I think that 'feel' you are referrign to is what gets ignorant fools a false impression of having a chance against a quicker car though. LOL
Oh....and building a mod motor is hardly inexpensive. TRUST me.
Oh....and building a mod motor is hardly inexpensive. TRUST me.
and i was always pretty impressed with IRUN's TQ #'s when i read his sig. not too shabby for a little 4.6L if you ask me!
03-19-2009, 04:27 PM
#35
99_Z28, how old are you? By reading your posts I'd guess between 13 and 16.
Last edited by ScreaminRedZ; 03-19-2009 at 04:32 PM.
03-19-2009, 04:47 PM
#37
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My buddy's 2003 350Z made 245 rwhp with headers, high flow cats, a catback, and a CAI. He dynoed in 4th gear (5th is 1:1 in those cars), so he probably would have made 255ish. Either way, that motor is rated 287 as opposed to the 275 that the G35's were rated. I know the newer ones were made more hp. What year did you have?
03-19-2009, 05:07 PM
#39
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: eastern shore, VA
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My buddy's 2003 350Z made 245 rwhp with headers, high flow cats, a catback, and a CAI. He dynoed in 4th gear (5th is 1:1 in those cars), so he probably would have made 255ish. Either way, that motor is rated 287 as opposed to the 275 that the G35's were rated. I know the newer ones were made more hp. What year did you have?
99_Z28, how old are you? By reading your posts I'd guess between 13 and 16.
99_Z28, how old are you? By reading your posts I'd guess between 13 and 16.
and anyone who doubts my races can go **** themselves, i NEVER said i beat 10 stangs i said a few, like 2 or three. and i have no damn idea what type of tranny they had, or their mods, who the hell cares they lost to a v6.
03-19-2009, 05:14 PM
#40
yes that 03 was a non rev motor, mine was an 05 they were more powerful. mine was rated at 297hp crank.
and anyone who doubts my races can go **** themselves, i NEVER said i beat 10 stangs i said a few, like 2 or three. and i have no damn idea what type of tranny they had, or their mods, who the hell cares they lost to a v6.
and anyone who doubts my races can go **** themselves, i NEVER said i beat 10 stangs i said a few, like 2 or three. and i have no damn idea what type of tranny they had, or their mods, who the hell cares they lost to a v6.
. Not trying to knock you or anything, but last time I checked...a win is a win. Doesn't matter if its N/A, boost, spray, 4 banger, v12. So they lost to a 6..so what. There are plenty of v6s that will put a hurting on cars. I6s as well. Some boosted, some N/A.