guilty

professional courtesey is one thing...letting someone go on a DUI is breakin the law, no matter how you chalk it up. like someone allready stated, what if that cop went up the road and killed a family of 4??? who gets the blame?? cause ya know the cop being pulled over will be recorded on their log, so they will find out that he was pulled over only moments before. i dunno.
It aggrivates me as much as anyone else when I hear about cops getting away with weird stuff but I dont have a bleeding heart for the next guy who gets stopped breaking the law who has to pay the price and points the finger at someone else.
I spent thousands of dollars, lost my license twice and spent 8 months in court for something I did behind the wheel and it was because of our system sucks because a friends dog's owner's brother's wife's sister in law knows someone who got out of a ticket.
People need to worry more about themselves and how they obey the law rather than using the "how about them" line everytime they get into trouble.
PDD was going over the speed limit, was caught, went to courty expecting a favor because he didnt really want to pay, had to follow the rules and pay for violating the speed limit and the judical system sucks?
Gimme a break guys, you know your breaking the law and you know what is going to happen if your caught. You either break the law or you dont, whats up with this "well I only broke it a little" garbage?
The second argument is about whether there are 2 sets of rules, 1 for the general population and one for civil servants (cops, judges, etc...) and whether it's right or not. YES there are 2 sets of rules. If I were to ever get pulled over with an open alcoholic beverage in my car, do you know how quickly I'd get put away? Yep that's right, quicker than you could mutter "but officer" This cop/professor did it and was told to have a nice day and be careful.
These 2 arguments really don't intertwine unless the question about whether and officer would get a ticket for going 7mph over the limit. If that question comes up.....what do you think would happen?
There is right and there is wrong, 65.1 mph is wrong. When did we start coming up with our own personal limits of flexibility to the law. If I'm driving 66 in a 65 and I get stopped I know I'll prob get f*cked. I was wrong to go faster than allowed. Just because it was a "little faster" doesnt mean it was less than 65.
I should of used that in court when I was there ........ "judge, I broke the law but I didnt break it that much" hahah
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Hypocrites.
Hypocrites.
Am I worried about the cop that's breaking the damn law? Yes I am because if I could kill someone going .1 mph over the speed limit then so can he. Why is it OK for him to get away with it, while it's not for me?! Joe I went to college to become a cop, I knew many cops back then and SAW, yes SAW a lot of what went on. It's not hearsay, it's a matter of what I know. Come on man, this argument is futile. I am not disagreeing with the fact that wrong is wrong. I am arguing the fact that the politics behind our judicial system are VERY crooked!
I've been seeing a lot more people getting tickets these days. The fact is, the reason for a speed limit is for safety and the reason for ticketing is to ensure people follow it. Maybe cops are becoming a little more aggressive and giving out more ticket, because if you think about it, if you knew you'd get a ticket for going any mile over the speed limit, you most likely wouldn't go over it. The fact that a lot of people expect that they can go +/-10 mph without a ticket makes people do that speed. And so many people plead not guilty with "small" tickets because the tradition is that most likely the cop won't show up and the ticket will get thrown out. Maybe they are trying to do away with this tradition too..
Last edited by lilstephsls1; Jan 20, 2006 at 03:11 PM.
There is right and there is wrong, 65.1 mph is wrong.
Bad analogy there. 65 - 75 mph is not endangering anyone's life. 166 on the other hand...
Laws are made to keep us safe. 72 mph IMO is not unsafe (in a 65 mph zone). I think if the officer would have excercised a little patience, he could have pulled over someone who deserved it.
(e) Sun screening and other materials prohibited.--
1. No person shall drive any motor vehicle with any sun screening device or other material which does not permit a person to see or view the inside of the vehicle through the windshield, side wing or side window of the vehicle.
2. This subsection does not apply to:
1. A vehicle which is equipped with tinted windows of the type and specification that were installed by the manufacturer of the vehicle or to any hearse, ambulance, government vehicle or any other vehicle for which a currently valid certificate of exemption has been issued in accordance with regulations adopted by the department.
...
unless its an area wheres theres lots of accidents or agresssive drivers he shouldve never even gave you a second look.
Quit being a bunch of ******* cry babies, if your ******* stupid enough to break the law then take it like a man and pay your dues.
If you dont like it THEN DONT BREAK THE ******* LAW.
Common sense here, a ******* 3rd grade student gets the concept but half of this forum. Cut your dicks off cause your killing the general population.
I still think if the cop or judge were a HUMANITARIAN he would have given him a break. But... from the sound of your response I must have mistintepreted the definition of the word. In fact, he's lucky you weren't his judge. Otherwise he might be in jail for the rest of his life.


