This might be a bad Idea, but.......
03-25-2010, 05:22 PM
#482
03-25-2010, 06:19 PM
#487
I must have missed the memo on the cast headers part. I never read anywhere that he planned to go that route. I always thought he was going with a tube/log header. Thats what I didn't get.
03-25-2010, 08:32 PM
#489
03-26-2010, 02:13 AM
#491
Can't wait to see a finished product!! Also, glad to see two similar small businesses getting along instead of chewing each others asses!
BTW - ^ This guy is awesome, I've done some business with him recently and he has by far, the best customer appreciation out of all the places I have dealt with recently!!
BTW - ^ This guy is awesome, I've done some business with him recently and he has by far, the best customer appreciation out of all the places I have dealt with recently!!
03-29-2010, 10:37 AM
#500
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ATX©
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A word of advice from someone who has first hand experience...
I would ditch the V-Bands underneath the car. FLP header owners learned the hard way, Multiple turbo companies have as well. V-Bands are effective, simple, and quick, however, anywhere they can get hit or damaged cause serious issues.
Go 3 Bolt, or move the v-bands higher than the transmission. I know 3 bolt is "ghetto fabulous," but the v-bands are nothing but a headache under the car.
-Wade
I would ditch the V-Bands underneath the car. FLP header owners learned the hard way, Multiple turbo companies have as well. V-Bands are effective, simple, and quick, however, anywhere they can get hit or damaged cause serious issues.
Go 3 Bolt, or move the v-bands higher than the transmission. I know 3 bolt is "ghetto fabulous," but the v-bands are nothing but a headache under the car.
-Wade