Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

HELP! turbo setup sucks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2008 | 09:19 PM
  #61  
cablebandit's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

no offense meant but you seem a little impatient. Something is definitely wrong with your setup. The headers and crossover pipe should be fine to get you to the 9s....even the 3" dp will get you 9s. That combo might not support 8s but definitely should do 9s. The gear is FOR SURE wrong....3.08 - 3.55 is where you should be.
Old 12-22-2008 | 09:43 PM
  #62  
HUNTER02SS's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 1
From: Kennesaw, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by z28boysteve
Yes well we all know a 76GTS or a PT88 car can go 8s... but a 408... Is too big to use the full potential of the turbo it can work... but a motor like a 370 would have less backpressure than a larger 408, therefore the pressure ratio is more on the turbos efficiency range, instead of its choke point, less heat is introduced into the charge air, and the turbo just functions better...

unfortunately my 3" dp goes all the way to the turbine outlet... clamped directly to it... its probably killing me about 100 hp... and to boot, my water pump on my intercooler had taken a ****, so my intake temps were probably about 200F when I hit 175 F on the dyno I ended up with only 4 degrees of advance and lost 75 horse just because we were hot pulling it and the water got too hot, so yeah I know I can fix my intercooler, remount the heat exchanger away from the radiator, get a bigger downpipe, turn up the boost, use race gas, use my methanol injection blah blah blah.. would probably make 900 rwhp at 20 psi on a dyno.....BUT to me and how much I spent, and the parts I got that were fucked up from pro turbo kits that made me HAVE to downsize turbos etc etc I think that would stilll even suck..

I want to make the most of the motor I have... not bandaid what can be bandaided I've spent 70,000 on parts and im slower than when I was cam only with a 100 shot... I've been wanting to be the world's fastest 6 speed f body, and im so far off its not even funny the PT88 will not get me there no matter what with a 6 speed, once I can take that record, ill go ahead and put a powerglide in the thing.



As you can see I've got ALOT of room for a monster turbo..... why not use it?

I think Im going to settle on an S91 and 1 3/4 headers, with 3" collectors and crossover, a t6 flange and about 14" of 5" downpipe/dumptube. that should do me right. but would those be the right sized headers? and what do I need for charge pipe to make the most of it. Im building the kit myself this time, and if it kicks as, Ill make copies of it for sale.
You seem like to me you are talking yourself out of the setup.
If you truly spent $70,000 on your setup to be the "worlds fastest" 6 speed, then you should of went ahead and spent another 5grand and got a LSX 6bolt block and a set of 6 bolt heads. Your not going to make more than a 1000rwhp before pushing water and my friend that is not going to get you no world record! By looking at your last pic, you have alot of room in the engine bay.Upgrade your charge pipe to a 3or 4in. as well. If you would just listen to the people in this thread, you will get all your problems solved, and be running and making alot of power. There are people here that are running your turbo and making alot of power. The 408 is not to big. Your 3in. down pipe is killing you, and if you truly are running a 4.30 gear on a turbo car, you need to get that changed out to a 3.0-3.50 like others have said.The taller gear will put a load on the car! This isn't a mustang setup!You asked for our help, and if you will just listen you will get it fixed and running properly. WHen you get it running look me up! I will gladly run you 6 speed for 6 speed! Sorry to rant, but you seem like you could careless that everybody is trying to help you. The majority that are helping you have been thru your problems!You asked for our help, we are trying to help, if you will just listen!
Old 12-22-2008 | 10:32 PM
  #63  
frcefed98's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 6
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Amen
Old 12-22-2008 | 10:54 PM
  #64  
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 1
Default

Problem experienced is people are giving good advice, though most of the time it is not taken.

A 408 and PT88 with a 4" DP will make the power neaded to go 5's in the 8th and easy 9's in the 1/4.

If he wants to scrap is current setup its his choice. I dont see the need but I wont try to talk him out of it. Its his $$$$$$.

Not to be a dick, but I bet we will see a future thread about why a 370 with a Large frame PT91 wont runa number or make XXX rwhp. Its what makes LS1Tech fun.
Old 12-23-2008 | 12:20 AM
  #65  
z28boysteve's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

I would take peoples advice....... if my ultimate goal was a pedestrian 900 rwhp 9 second car
but that was NEVER my goal.
Ive been running a 3.42 gear...btw the car did make 557 rwhp @ 10 psi on a mustang dyno, I could do a bunch of things to make 900 rwhp at 20 psi, but to me that's nothing impressive. not to say people arent giving good advice, but I wanted the kit I have been describing the entire thread in the first place. Thats what PTK had promised me, and instead they took my money, sent me 1/2 of their regular base pile of crap "Race" kit for a 76GTS and basically ripped me off before going out of buisness. What I did put together, was something that would just get me running in the mean time I know it sucks, and I know there is Tons of improvement left in it.. just not enough to make me happy.

YES I REALIZE A PT88 will work ok on a 408, but is it the OPTIMAL turbo to have? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
in my opinion I would be "throwing away money" to spend all my time getting the car all scienced out and running 9.xs with it to still want to grow and move on to a bigger kit anyway

What I was basically asking in the first place is my kit sucks, I dont even want to waste my time to make it right.
I want to build a new kit, with a turbo that would be the Optimal turbo for my car and I was wondering what would be the best header dimensions crossover dimensions etc etc thats all

Last edited by z28boysteve; 12-23-2008 at 12:57 AM.
Old 12-23-2008 | 01:13 AM
  #66  
z28boysteve's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Steve, you’re right on track. An 88 mm turbo will only provide 55 to 60 pounds of air per minute. If you want more power, turn up the boost. The T4 flange may bite you in the *** with the exhaust back pressure. Once the back pressure exceeds the boost you’re going to loose 11 hp for every psi above manifold pressure. You’re going to need a T6 turbine housing, 3”hot side pipes and 4 to 4 ½ cold sit pipes. The downpipe will need to be 3 ½ to 4” Sent me pictures, George
Old 12-23-2008 | 02:25 AM
  #67  
Louis's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 2
From: Frisco/Wylie
Default

Originally Posted by z28boysteve
Steve, you’re right on track. An 88 mm turbo will only provide 55 to 60 pounds of air per minute. If you want more power, turn up the boost. The T4 flange may bite you in the *** with the exhaust back pressure. Once the back pressure exceeds the boost you’re going to loose 11 hp for every psi above manifold pressure. You’re going to need a T6 turbine housing, 3”hot side pipes and 4 to 4 ½ cold sit pipes. The downpipe will need to be 3 ½ to 4” Sent me pictures, George
Hunh?
Old 12-23-2008 | 02:33 AM
  #68  
Louis's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 2
From: Frisco/Wylie
Default

unfortunately my 3" dp goes all the way to the turbine outlet... clamped directly to it... its probably killing me about 100 hp...
More than that....

and to boot, my water pump on my intercooler had taken a ****, so my intake temps were probably about 200F when I hit 175 F on the dyno I ended up with only 4 degrees of advance and lost 75 horse just because we were hot pulling it and the water got too hot
You hit 175 IAT on the DYNO?! Thats dumb!! Its well over 250-275 on the street. Your car is barely making 400-450, as observed by your track times.





I think Im going to settle on an S91 and 1 3/4 headers, with 3" collectors and crossover, a t6 flange and about 14" of 5" downpipe/dumptube. that should do me right. but would those be the right sized headers? and what do I need for charge pipe to make the most of it.
Yes, but 3" is too big for the collectors. 2.5" is fine.

Im building the kit myself this time, and if it kicks as, Ill make copies of it for sale.
Old 12-23-2008 | 07:12 AM
  #69  
engineermike's Avatar
TECH Addict

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by z28boysteve
... An 88 mm turbo will only provide 55 to 60 pounds of air per minute. ...
I want to be the first to point out that an 88 mm turbo will flow 120++ lb/min of air.
Old 12-23-2008 | 07:19 AM
  #70  
engineermike's Avatar
TECH Addict

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by z28boysteve
I need some help. ... I dont know what my problem is!
...
Should I go ahead with this? or stick to what I have, make a 4" DP, and 4" charge pipes and hope for the best?
Originally Posted by z28boysteve
What I was basically asking in the first place is my kit sucks, I dont even want to waste my time to make it right.
I want to build a new kit, with a turbo that would be the Optimal turbo for my car and I was wondering what would be the best header dimensions crossover dimensions etc etc thats all


BTW, the PT88 is good for solid 8's, not "just" 9's.
Old 12-23-2008 | 08:02 AM
  #71  
z28boysteve's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I want to be the first to point out that an 88 mm turbo will flow 120++ lb/min of air.

exactly! AN 88 mm turbo... which are you refering to because precisiom, the people who make the damn PT88 dont claim it can flow 120 lb min!
Old 12-23-2008 | 08:09 AM
  #72  
engineermike's Avatar
TECH Addict

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by z28boysteve
...precisiom, the people who make the damn PT88 dont claim it can flow 120 lb min!
You must have misunderstood them, or vice versa. The 76 flows 100 lb/min or so and the 88 mm has 35% more eye area. The 55-60 lb/min number you cited would be about a 58 mm turbo.
Old 12-23-2008 | 08:53 AM
  #73  
z28boysteve's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

all Ive been saying is if an 88 is good for 900 rear wheel, an M6 car wont run 8s... or at least I don't forsee it happening at 3800 lbs its probably possible, but I can do so much better with a new kit, so why dont i just make it happen?
Old 12-23-2008 | 09:11 AM
  #74  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 3
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

Truck manifolds, 4" down pipe, 4" cold side, 55-91 or 55-94 a2w and there you have it 1200-1300whp. Now you can run easy 8's on a 6 speed with the best of the best suspension tuning and parts.
Old 12-23-2008 | 09:27 AM
  #75  
ggk's Avatar
ggk
Launching!

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Solon, Ohio
Default

to me it seems like all he has to do is tops fab up new collector sides and def make a bigger down pipe and then make a new cold side if there is a problem with its small size.

seems like a weekend to me(assuming he has the piping).
Old 12-23-2008 | 09:36 AM
  #76  
Louis's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 2
From: Frisco/Wylie
Default

You need to get your priorities right. First of all, get it running, tuned right, and maxing out the 88. Then you need to put the car on a diet. "Fastest M6" and 3800#s is an oxymoron.
Old 12-23-2008 | 10:01 AM
  #77  
HUNTER02SS's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 1
From: Kennesaw, Georgia
Default

So now you say a "PEDESTRIAN 900RWHP"!! WTF! You havn't even made that yet. You may have a goal of being the worlds fastest 6 speed, but that is all you have! You will never make your goal with your 408 motor you have!
You will be limited by pushing water. You obviusly havn't thought this out, or did research on any of this. Its alway's easier to work with what you have and get it fixed ,then go from there. But I still say your biggest hold up will be the motor. You WILL push water. And to be the fastest, you will need
12-1300rwhp with a 6 speed, and you will not get that without pushing water!
Old 12-23-2008 | 10:08 AM
  #78  
Shearer's Avatar
Launching!

 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Northern Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Louis
My exact thought on this entire thread.
Old 12-23-2008 | 10:08 AM
  #79  
HUNTER02SS's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 1
From: Kennesaw, Georgia
Default

To give you an idea on a setup! Here is my new setup.
427LSX Motor with ETP 265cc 6 Bolt Heads. EZ94mm Billet Turbo,
Tick Performance 6 Speed. I am looking for 12-1300RWHP.
I will have appx. $25,000 invested in the Whole project!!
I am not going for any records, but you would need something similar in size to get your world record 6 speed!
Old 12-23-2008 | 10:09 AM
  #80  
ls1290's Avatar
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,284
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Louis
You need to get your priorities right. First of all, get it running, tuned right, and maxing out the 88.
Bingo. I have put countless dollars into my car because I did not have a well defined goal. Nothing like buying 4 difference version of the same part


Quick Reply: HELP! turbo setup sucks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.