Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Anyone looked into using the LQ9/LQ4 6.0L heads for supercharging?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2003 | 04:42 PM
  #21  
MYTURBOT/A's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: orlando, florida
Default

So do the stock 6.0 heads flow better then the stock ls1, or is the only advantage the comp. drop?
Old 11-18-2003 | 06:00 PM
  #22  
Tiger Shark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
There is no physical difference in the LQ9 / LQ4 head. I have an LQ9 motor in my Silverado SS, and it has heads with casting number 317. The 317 heads also come on Escalades, Denali, HD trucks, etc... All the newer (01+) 6 liter heads have 71 cc chambers and the D shaped exhaust ports similar to the LS6 head.



The difference in compression on these motors comes from the piston, not the head: flat top hypereutectic on the LQ9 VS cast dished on the LQ4. Several months back, Chris Endres wrote an article for GMHTP (also in his book, but the article came out first) saying the 035 head was preferred over the 317 6 liter head in the FI community due to its 9.4:1 CR. He didn't take into account the CR was different due to the piston, not the head, so the article was misleading at best.

Dont pay a premium for the 035 head, its the same as the 317 head.
I didn't know that. Thanks for the info!!!
Old 11-18-2003 | 09:15 PM
  #23  
Robzilla's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: Friendswood, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by MYTURBOT/A
So do the stock 6.0 heads flow better then the stock ls1, or is the only advantage the comp. drop?
I'm pretty sure they flow close to the ls6 heads, just do a search in the internal engine section, there was a post awhile back that had flow charts of all the different kinds of stock heads.
Old 11-19-2003 | 07:20 AM
  #24  
smokinHawk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, ohio
Default

Originally Posted by MYTURBOT/A
So do the stock 6.0 heads flow better then the stock ls1, or is the only advantage the comp. drop?
yes the flow very well compared to the ls1 heads.
comparable to the ls6 heads.
im pushing past 58lbs/min of air at 10lbs of boost, with just the exhasut sides midley ported.
Old 11-19-2003 | 02:10 PM
  #25  
SS00Blue's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
There is no physical difference in the LQ9 / LQ4 head. I have an LQ9 motor in my Silverado SS, and it has heads with casting number 317. The 317 heads also come on Escalades, Denali, HD trucks, etc... All the newer (01+) 6 liter heads have 71 cc chambers and the D shaped exhaust ports similar to the LS6 head.
Yeah, that's what I thought, too. Apparently Valvegod (Shaun Carter) who sources cores to many big CNC head porting outfits, thought this, too.

So the point is that this is not correct... maybe ( ). Please refer to post #6 in th following thread:

http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread...hreadid=376535

I purchased the 317 casting from Shaun, and I would truly like to think they are the same as the 035s, as I had previously thought. But in the big three, a part number change NEVER, NEVER happens without a engineering change notification and that means a different part. What else can I say?

SC-
Old 11-19-2003 | 03:51 PM
  #26  
OOsilverado's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

I have an LQ9 motor and it has 317 heads on it, just like every other LQ9 motor out there.

Same with all the LQ4 trucks.
Old 11-19-2003 | 04:07 PM
  #27  
MYTURBOT/A's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: orlando, florida
Default

From what i`ve heard. The only vehicle the lq9 heads (casting #035) come on are the cadillac escilade EXT. Caddy always gets the cool stuff
Old 11-19-2003 | 04:17 PM
  #28  
OOsilverado's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Why would GM have to different versions of the same LQ9 motor?? That doesnt make sense, there is some bad info floating around talking about those heads being on the LQ9s and it isnt true.

Also I think it was Big Tex, He worked on an EXT and it had 317 heads on it as well
Old 11-19-2003 | 04:30 PM
  #29  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?

iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
From: East of Dallas
Default

I took out a LQ9 from a 2003 Escalade EXT this year and replaced it with an ARE stroker. The take out LQ9 had 317 heads.

SS00Blue - I think that #6 post is wrong.
Old 11-19-2003 | 04:37 PM
  #30  
MYTURBOT/A's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: orlando, florida
Default

I think the lq4 and lq9 heads are exactly the same. there is no evidence other then the part numbers that says other wise. The port volumes are the same, combustion chamber CCs are the same, same D shaped exhaust ports. Can`t find any flow charts that show both lq4 and lq9. I think that the pre 01 lq4 iron heads were differant then the lq9 so people just assumed that when they went aluminum they were still differant, when in reality all they did was take the lq9 heads and slap a new part # on them and called them the new and improved aluminum version lq4 head.
Old 11-19-2003 | 05:50 PM
  #31  
smokinHawk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, ohio
Default

[QUOTE=Pro Stock John]I have the older 6.0 heads that were 70/71 cc's stock.

Mine are around 69cc's now. I did the 6.0's for two reasons:
-higher cc
-better flowing heads at higher lift than ls1/5.3's

[QUOTE]

what year were your heads John?
the older 2000 and older were iron, i hope your heads arnt iron.

i got the 6.0 heads off a 2001 truck, they cc'ed to 69cc's (both heads)
did you have your heads cc'd?
wonder if theres that much difference in tolerance for gm for one head to have 69cc's and another 71cc's


i also think the lq4 and lq9 heads are the same.
Old 11-19-2003 | 06:06 PM
  #32  
phenyxTA's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Default

I should have my AS stage II LQ4's on before long. I'll post some dyno results asap.
Old 11-20-2003 | 06:42 AM
  #33  
SS00Blue's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MYTURBOT/A
... when in reality all they did was take the lq9 heads and slap a new part # on them and called them the new and improved aluminum version lq4 head.
GM Purchasing, which basically runs GM, frowns HEAVILY on creating additional part numbers for nothing. Many reasons for this. There is no way that occurred. Something HAS to change for a new PN to be created. Bottom line. It could be as small as an additional accessory drive hole drilled and tapped, but something needs to change for the number to be created.

Big Tex: I hope that post is wrong, too. (It IS LS1.com, after all), but I still see no real conclusive proof that it is, in fact, wrong. I would be convinced if someone could identify the change that created the new number (though it still could be that there were more than one change that happened simultaneously). Or... Bone stock flow numbers on the two part numbers, at the same time, on the same flow bench. Now THAT would do it!

SC-
Old 10-24-2010 | 03:33 AM
  #34  
bobs2500hd's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Here's a chart for engine block and head casting numbers. The LQ4 and 9 had the same heads.
http://chevythunder.com/LS1%20components.htm
Old 10-27-2010 | 05:52 AM
  #35  
yessir's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

read the dates of the posts in the thread
Old 10-27-2010 | 06:27 AM
  #36  
dschmittie1's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 2
From: York, PA
Default

holy old thread!! 7 years haha
Old 10-27-2010 | 05:19 PM
  #37  
MillsMotorvation's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 2
From: South of Augusta,GA
Default

Originally Posted by bobs2500hd
Here's a chart for engine block and head casting numbers. The LQ4 and 9 had the same heads.
http://chevythunder.com/LS1%20components.htm
Great info Here!!
Old 10-27-2010 | 06:31 PM
  #38  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,889
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

dam. i remember this thread



Quick Reply: Anyone looked into using the LQ9/LQ4 6.0L heads for supercharging?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.