Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Went for a ride in a procharged vehicle today...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2009, 04:04 PM
  #21  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
josepy121380's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SilverSS
Is the car tuned? My Procharged car at 12psi made my 440rwhp H/C car feel like a Honda Civic.
Your procharged ls1 only made 440 on 12 lbs??
Old 05-12-2009, 04:09 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
 
Adam98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tomball, Tx
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No it made his 440rwhp h/c car feel like a civic
Old 05-12-2009, 04:14 PM
  #23  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
BlkBird2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wood River, IL
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by josepy121380
Your procharged ls1 only made 440 on 12 lbs??
lollll Read a little more carefully.
Old 05-12-2009, 04:18 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (35)
 
baylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: mesa,arizona
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
Here's a six speed ProCharger equipped V. http://vimeo.com/4192845 Bob
sick
Old 05-12-2009, 04:57 PM
  #25  
TECH Resident
 
Denali08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
Here's a six speed ProCharger equipped V. http://vimeo.com/4192845 Bob
Cadillac should build it this way.

For the OP, belt slip or rear gear is too high.

Check your boost gauge.

Last edited by Denali08; 05-12-2009 at 05:04 PM.
Old 05-12-2009, 05:51 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
 
ls 2 goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by josepy121380
Your procharged ls1 only made 440 on 12 lbs??
Comprehension > You
Old 05-12-2009, 06:12 PM
  #27  
Launching!
 
camarosam22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Something is obviously wrong, if that is what prochargers actually acted like no one would be buying them. And they wouldnt be able to keep up with simular power turbo cars. Heres a vid of my friends hpf m3 vs a s/c z06, close in power, near the middle of vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Zr7...e=channel_page
Old 05-12-2009, 06:13 PM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I agree with every one else that something is wrong. When I shift and the pedal goes to the floor the boost gauge snaps right back to 10#'s and then goes to the 12# mark by 6,500 rpms. This thing scares the **** out of me, by the time I let out in 4th at about a 140mph my hands are shaking.
Old 05-12-2009, 07:16 PM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Smearin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camarosam22
Something is obviously wrong, if that is what prochargers actually acted like no one would be buying them. And they wouldnt be able to keep up with simular power turbo cars. Heres a vid of my friends hpf m3 vs a s/c z06, close in power, near the middle of vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Zr7...e=channel_page
Yea those hpf turbo kits for the M start around 15k... LOL!!! ridicilious
Old 05-12-2009, 07:23 PM
  #30  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
josepy121380's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls 2 goat
Comprehension > You
yeah yeah **** off i see it.
Old 05-12-2009, 07:35 PM
  #31  
Launching!
 
camarosam22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Smearin
Yea those hpf turbo kits for the M start around 15k... LOL!!! ridicilious
Yeah their pretty exspensive, as is anything related to a bmw.
Old 05-12-2009, 08:34 PM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Smearin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They would def. be more attractable, but thats just a little too much $$.. I like the new e92 too.
Old 05-12-2009, 09:20 PM
  #33  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
99Ls1fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Eaton, Colorado
Posts: 1,822
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Smearin
Shouldve got a turbo!!!! LOL
Where are you from in Colorado, I live up by greeley.
Old 05-12-2009, 09:48 PM
  #34  
TECH Cry Baby BOSS APPROVED!
iTrader: (5)
 
Urban Legend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,799
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Smearin
I like the new e92 too.
I do too.
Old 05-13-2009, 02:48 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
sixonetwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

suprising, 2000 trans usually pull better than that
Old 05-13-2009, 03:12 PM
  #36  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
MY99TAWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kelowna,BC
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I have had rides on two ati cars. One was near stock lt1 and buddy ran it against my car which had headers and cam at the time, buddies car which was near stock ls1 and other buddies ls1 with heads,cam/headers bolt ons. He couldn't beat the heads/cam /header bolt on car so he went home and tightened up his belt and blew a ringland. His car was not that much faster than my headers cam bolt on car we were close to even.But again this was a six speed near stock think it had headers lt1.

Buddy bought an auto d1 ls1 and I got to drive and ride it. It was not that impressive either but was at only 8psi stock engine with maybe headers. It had stock stall and not sure gears but it was pretty doggy.

I am not saying though that a properly stalled up say 3.42 or 3.73 auto d1 car would be slow especially at 12psi.Sure it would rock out pretty nicely.
And ditto on a six speed it really should have 3.73 maybe even 4.10 gears to get that thing revving quick and up into higher boost faster.Tuning of course is still pretty important with timing being really important. Afr not quite as much but if there was knock retard happening that can really slow a car down.

I still like the way turbos hit,especially my twins and they already pull hard but its a built 408 and even at only 8psi or so likely have 650rwhp and 700 or so torque from looking at similar bulids. As you said you had ride in your buddies aps car.
The aps spool up pretty quick. Even quicker on my bigger engine. I need to get some logs to see just how quick.But think they are like full by 3000 in third gear on the m6 which is still in there.

Anyway I think prochargers are still pretty good and still want one for my 96z .
If you want even crazier with turbos or supers get some spray and hit it with even a small shot like 75 or 100 shot and see how quick turbos can spool and how quick bet that car would rev which would of course also help the supercharger get into higher boost.

Thats still where bit of misconception comes in .The procharger does not have the lag of a turbo technically but it still can't build full boost until it hits high in the rpm band. The turbo can take a second but it can hit full lower say 3000rpm. So the turbos normally have much better area under the curve and wider powerbands.Just compare any two similar charts of centrifugal and turbo. Course you need to compare similar units in terms of airflow.

All fun toys. But yeah car should still have screamed at 12psi if things were optimized.
Old 05-13-2009, 05:28 PM
  #37  
Launching!
 
camarosam22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Smearin
They would def. be more attractable, but thats just a little too much $$.. I like the new e92 too.
Yeah their really nice. Yeah before he went hpf he was looking into cams, 2 of them were 2 grand, like the same material that are 300 dollar ones are made of. With most of the stuff its just cause its made for a "bmw".
Old 05-13-2009, 10:35 PM
  #38  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Something is wrong big time HERE is 5psi 9:5 compression D1SC Cammed stock heads

PULLS ALL THE WAY TO 6900rpm with 6rip pulley

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT9Lnsqxkbo


.
Old 05-14-2009, 02:19 PM
  #39  
11Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Gauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dallas (Richardson), TX, USA
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My 650RWHP D1-SC setup is kind of new to me, and I have to admit that it seems a lot tamer than I thought it would. I mean, it's fun to drive, but it's just not the kick in the pants I thought it would be. I'm pretty sure this is primarily because the torque isn't that high. It's only 56xRWTQ vs. the 700RWTQ that would probably accompany a similar turbo setup. And, being a stick car, it does feel sluggish if you stab the gas at 3k RPMs with only 5psi of boost.

It's all relative, though. Two years ago my car would have scared me to death as it sits now. However, after a couple years racing dad's 9.5-second Nova, it's just... not the same, I guess.
Old 05-14-2009, 04:45 PM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (30)
 
SilverSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Pole
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Too many people over cam their Procharged street cars imo. I went from a fairly large cam to something almost as small as stock. I love the way it runs with a tiny cam. Power everywhere. Tons of tire roasting torque down low and I only lost about 5hp up top. 5psi @ 3000rpm will obliterate my 315's till redline.


Quick Reply: Went for a ride in a procharged vehicle today...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.